Collective and School-Based Mentor Education: Developing Professional Learning Communities of Mentors

Abstract

Studies have documented numerous positive effects of mentoring, but few studies have focused on mentor education and mentors’ professional development and learning. In Norway, the focus on mentoring and mentor education has been visible in political documents and teacher education for several years. However, the scale of mentor education has been small, despite official documents requiring mentor education for all teachers mentoring pre-service teachers and newly qualified teachers. This mixed methods study investigated four Norwegian schools in which all teachers and leaders took a university-based mentor education as part of a university–school project. The study aims to bring awareness to mentor education and what expectations teachers have of it, along with what experiences and benefits teachers express after completing mentor education collectively. The data were collected using a quantitative survey (N = 83) and qualitative focus group interviews (N = 9). The results show that, despite having few expectations when starting, mentor education was experienced as important and useful for teachers because the knowledge and skills acquired are relevant in all facets of the teaching profession. Moreover, the results provide an indication of the benefits of taking mentor education collectively and developing professional learning communities of mentors.

Keywords

• mentor education
• mentors
• school-based professional development
• teacher education
• mixed-methods design

References

1. Amdal, I. I., & Mastad, L. B. (2022). The understanding of the role of teacher educators among school-based teacher educators in Norway. Acta Didactica Norden, 16(1), 1–23. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.5617/adno.9154
2. Aspfors, J., & Fransson, G. (2015). Research on mentor education for mentors of newly qualified teachers: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 75–86. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.004
3. Bjerkholt, E. (2017). Profesjonsveiledning. Fra praktisk virksomhet til teoretisk felt. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
5. Brodie, K. (2021). Teacher agency in professional learning communities. Professional Development in Education, 47(4), 560–573. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1689523
6. Bullough, R. V., Jr. (2005). Being and becoming a mentor: School-based teacher educators and teacher educator identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 143–155. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.002
7. Castanheira, P. S. P. (2016). Mentoring for educators’ professional learning and development: A meta-synthesis of IJMCE volumes 1–4. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 5(4), 334–346. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-10-2015-0030
8. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clarke, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. USA: SAGE Publications.

9. Ertsås, T. I., & Irgens, E. J. (2021). Developing organizational knowledge in schools: The role of theory and theorizing in collective capacity building. Journal of Educational Change. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09433-3
10. Evertson, C. M., & Smithey, M. W. (2000). Mentoring effects on protégés’ classroom practice: An experimental field study. Journal of Educational Research, 93(5), 294–304. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/27542279
11. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2003). What new teachers need to learn. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 25–29.
12. Giebelhaus, C. R., & Bowman, C. L. (2002). Teaching mentors: Is it worth the effort? Journal of Educational Research, 95(4), 246–254. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080.00220670209596597
13. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. USA: Teachers College Press.
14. Haynes-Brown, T. K., & Fetters, M. D. (2021). Using joint display as an analytic process: An illustration using bar graph joint displays from a mixed methods study of how beliefs shape secondary school teachers’ use of technology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–14. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406921993286
15. Hobson, A. J., Ashby, P., Malderez, A., & Tomlinson, P. D. (2009). Mentoring beginning teachers: What we know and what we don’t. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 207–216. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.001
16. Huijboom F., Van Meeuwen, P., Rusman, E., & Vermeulen, M. (2020). How to enhance teachers’ professional learning by stimulating the development of professional learning communities: Operationalising a comprehensive PLC concept for assessing its development in everyday educational practice. Professional Development in Education, 46(5), 751–769. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1634630
17. Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(8), 201–233. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311403323
18. Kelchtermans, G. (2019). Early career teachers and their need for support: Thinking again. In A. Sullivan, B. Johnson, & M. Simons (Eds.), Attracting and keeping the best teachers. Issues and opportunities (pp. 83–98). Springer Singapore. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8621-3
19. Kemmis, S., Heikkinen, H. L. T., Fransson, G., Aspfors, J., & Edwards-Groves, C. (2014). Mentoring as a contested practice: Supervision, support and collaborative self-development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 154–164. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X14000778
20. Kutsyuruba, B., Walker, K. D., & Godden, L. (2019). Contextual factors in early career teaching: A systematic review of international research on teacher induction and mentoring programs. Journal of Global Education and Research, 3(2), 85–123. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5038/2577-509X.3.2.1057
21. Lejonberg, E., Dahl, A. K., & Brovold, S. P. (2021). Nye forventninger til veilederrollen: veiledere som ledere av utviklingsprosjekt i skolen. In K. Helstad & S. Mausethagen (Eds.), Nye lærer- og lederroller i skolen (pp. 107–125). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
22. Lillejord, S., & Børte, K. (2016). Partnership in teacher education – A research mapping. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(5), 550–563. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1252911
23. Long, T., Zhao, G., Yang, X., Zhao, R., & Chen, Q. (2021). Bridging the belief-action gap in a teachers’ professional learning community on teaching of thinking. Professional Development in Education, 47(5), 729–744. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1647872
24. Maloney, C., & Konza, D. (2011). A case study of teachers’ professional learning: Becoming a community of professional learning or not? Issues in Educational Research, 21(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.3316/aeipt.185988
25. Ministry of Education and Research. (2008) Kvalitet i skolen. [White Paper 31. (2007–2008)]. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/stmeld-nr-31-2007-2008-/id516853/?ch=1
26. Ministry of Education and Research. (2009) Kvalitet i barnehagen. [White Paper 41. (2008–2009)]. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/stmeld-nr-41-2008-2009-/id563868/?ch=1
27. Ministry of Education and Research. (2009) Læreren: Rollen og utdanningen. [White Paper 11. (2008–2009)]. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/stmeld-nr-11-2008-2009-/id544920
28. Ministry of Education and Research. (2010). Veilederutdanning av mentorer for nyutdannede lærere – forslag til rammer for utdanningen. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/kd/vedlegg/uh/gnist/veilederutdanning_arbeidsgrupperapport.pdf
29. Ministry of Education and Research. (2015). Kompetanse for kvalitet. Strategi for videreutdanning for lærere og skoleledere frem mot 2025. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/731323c71aa34a51a6febdeb8d41f2e0/kd_kompetanse-for-kvalitet_web.pdf
30. Ministry of Education and Research. (2017). Nasjonale strategi for kvalitet og samarbeid i lærerutdanningene. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/nasjonal-strategi-for-larerutdanningene/id2555622
31. Ministry of Education and Research. (2017) Lærelyst – tidlig innsats og kvalitet i skolen. [White Paper 21. (2016/2017)] Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-21-20162017/id2544344
32. Morgan, D. L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 362–376. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239800800307
33. Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2019). Rammer for veiledning I barnehage og skoler. Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/kvalitet-og-kompetanse/veiledning-av-nyutdannede/rammer-for-veiledning-i-barnehage-og-skoler/
34. Olsen, K.-R., Bjerkholt, E. M., & Heikkinen, H. L. T. (2020). Introduction: Mentoring and induction in the Nordic countries. In K.-R. Olsen, E. M. Bjerkholt, & H. L. T. Heikkinen (Eds.), New teachers in Nordic countries – ecologies of mentoring and induction (pp. 11–26). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.105cho
35. Orland-Barak, L. (2014). Mediation in mentoring: A synthesis of studies in teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 180–188. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.07.011
36. Pedagogstudentene. (2021). Praksis i lærerutdanningene: - Hva kjennetegner vellykket og mislykket praksis? Retrieved from https://www.pedagogstudentene.no/globalassets/_pedagogstudentene/dokumenter/undersokelser/praksis-i-larerutdanningene_2021.pdf
37. Postholm, M. B. (2016). Collaboration between teacher educators and schools to enhance development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 452–470. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1225717
38. Sandvik, L. V., Solhaug, T., Lejonberg, E., Elstad, E., & Christophersen, K.-A. (2020). School mentors’ perceived integration into teacher education programmes. Professional Development in Education, 46(3), 424–439. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1623286
39. Sandvik, L., & Fjørtoft, H. (2022). Skolebasert videreutdanning som modell i skoleutvikling. In L. Sandvik & H. Fjørtoft (Eds.), Skoleutvikling i videregående opplæring (pp. 31–47). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
40. Smith, K. (2016). Partnership in teacher education – Going beyond the rhetoric, with reference to the Norwegian context. CEPS Journal, 6(3), 17–36. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1128734.pdf
41. Stewart, D. W., Shamdasani, P. N., & Rook, D. W. (2009). Group depth interviews – Focus group research. In L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of applied social science research methods (pp. 589–616). USA: SAGE Publications.
42. Tang, S. Y. F., & Choi, P. L. (2005). Connecting theory and practice in mentor preparation: Mentoring for the improvement of teaching and learning. Mentoring & Tutoring, 13(3), 383–401. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260500206002
43. Thornton, K. (2014). Mentors as educational leaders and change agents. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 3(1), 18–31. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-07-2013-0038
44. Ulvik, M., & Sunde, E. (2013). The impact of mentor education: Does mentor education matter? Professional Development in Education, 39(5), 754–770. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.754783
45. Wang, J., Odell, S. J., & Schwille, S. A. (2008). Effects of teacher induction on beginning teachers’ teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 132–152. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487107314002 
46. Williams, A., Prestage, S., & Bedward, J. (2001). Individualism to collaboration: The significance of teacher culture to the induction of newly qualified teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 27(3), 253–267. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/02607470120091588