Research Article

Experiential Learning Provided to Preservice Teachers in Reading Assessment and Instruction

Volume: 15 Number: 1 April 30, 2026

Experiential Learning Provided to Preservice Teachers in Reading Assessment and Instruction

Abstract

Being literate in reading assessments is critical for teachers because it allows them to identify student needs, make data-based instructional decisions such as designing intervention and tailoring instruction based on need, and continuously monitor progress. Translated to educator preparation programs, it is extremely important that preservice teachers (PSTs) have ample opportunities to engage in this work through experiential learning, a process which can be achieved through strong university-school partnerships. A qualitative case study conducted from 2023-2024 explored 38 PSTs understanding of reading assessments. The data analysis consisted of open and pattern coding. The key themes highlighted the experience of the student being assessed, the process of assessment administration, the influence of the teacher administering the assessment, the value of the assessment for PSTs and for those in the field, and the increased development and content pedagogical knowledge. The main findings of this study indicate that school-university partnerships that provide PSTs with direct experience administering, scoring, and analysing reading assessments within educator preparation programs are instrumental in developing both assessment literacy and professional confidence. Implications of practice, limitations to the research study, and suggestions for future research are provided.

Keywords

References

  1. Binks-Cantrell, E., Washburn, E. K., Joshi, R. M., & Hougen, M. (2012). Peter Effect in the preparation of reading teachers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(6), 526–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.601434
  2. Bos, C., Mather, N., Dickson, S., Podhajski, B., & Chard, D. (2001). Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice educators about early reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 51(1), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-001-0007-0
  3. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.
  4. Brownell, M. T., Hirsch, E., & Seo, S. (2004). Meeting the demand for highly qualified special education teachers during severe shortages: What should policymakers consider? The Journal of Special Education, 38(1), 56-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669040380010501
  5. Burroughs, G., Lewis, A., Battey, D., & Curran, M., Hyland, N., & Ryan, S. (2019). From mediated fieldwork to co-constructed Partnerships: A framework for guiding and reflecting on p-12 school–university partnerships. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(1), 122-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119858992
  6. Burton, S.L. & Greher, G.R. (2007). School-university partnerships: What do we know and why do they matter? Arts Education Policy Review, 109(1), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.3200/AEPR.109.1.13-24
  7. Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (2022). CAEP standards for initial-level programs. http://caepnet.org/standards/2022-itp/introduction
  8. Council of Chief State School Officers. (2011). InTASC model core teaching standards: A resource for state dialogue. https://ccsso.org/sites/default/files/2017-12/2011_InTASC_Model_Core_Teaching_Standards_0.pdf

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Teacher Education and Professional Development of Educators

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Winn Crenshaw Wheeler This is me
0009-0000-0647-7481
United States

Publication Date

April 30, 2026

Submission Date

December 16, 2025

Acceptance Date

April 29, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 15 Number: 1

APA
Taylor, A., & Crenshaw Wheeler, W. (2026). Experiential Learning Provided to Preservice Teachers in Reading Assessment and Instruction. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 15(1), 27-49. https://izlik.org/JA29NB82TM