Evaluation of an ELT Practicum Programme from The Perspectives of Supervisors, Student Teachers and Graduates

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the English Language Teacher Education practicum offered at a state university in Turkey to discover (1) the strengths and weaknesses of the programme and (2) the needs and problems experienced by student teachers. Data were collected through an adapted version of the Survey of Teacher Education Programs (STEP) (Williams-Pettway, 2005) given to student teachers and graduates, focus group interviews with student teachers, and interviews with supervisors. The results indicate that diversity and technology components of the teacher education programme received lower ratings from both groups. Strengths associated with the practicum experience included having the chance to teach in classrooms, discussions and peer feedback, observing various grade levels, good relationship with cooperating teachers, and guidance by university supervisors. The reported needs pointed to a desire for more observation, seeing different school contexts, more cooperation with cooperating teachers, and improvement in the assessment procedures, and technology use

Keywords

• Pre-service teacher education, practicum, programme evaluation, English language teacher education

References

1. Akcan, S. (2010). Watching teacher candidates watch themselves: Reflections on a practicum program in Turkey. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Develop- ment, 12(1), 33-45.
2. Akcan, S., & Tatar, S. (2010). An investigation of the nature of feedback given to pre-service English teachers during their practice teaching experience. Teacher Development, 14(2), 153-172.
3. Akçay, B. (2013). ÖSYS sonuç analizörü (Student selection and placement system results analyzer). Retrieved from http://web.ee.hacettepe.edu.tr/osym/
4. Altınmakas, D. (2012). The influence of feedback on student teachers’ professional development. In Y. Bayyurt & Y. Bektaş-Çetinkaya (Eds.), Research perspectives on teaching and learning English in Turkey: Policies and practices (pp. 91-105). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
5. Alptekin, C., & Tatar, S. (2011). Research on foreign language teaching and learning in Turkey (2005-2009). Language Teaching, 44(3), 328−353.
6. Aydin, S. (2013). Teachers’ perceptions about the use of computers in EFL teaching and learning: The case of Turkey. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 214-233.
7. Bayyurt, Y. (2012). Proposing a model for English language education in the Turkish socio-cultural context. In Y. Bayyurt & Y. Bektaş-Çetinkaya (Eds.), Research per- spectives on teaching and learning English in Turkey: Policies and practices (pp. 301−312). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
8. Canh, L. V. (2014). Great expectations: The TESOL practicum as a professional learn- ing experience. TESOL Journal, 5(2), 199−224.

9. Celik, S. (2011). Characteristics and competencies for teacher educators: Addressing the need for improved professional standards in Turkey. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(4), 18-32.
10. Cohen, E., Hoz, R., & Kaplan, H. (2013). The practicum in preservice teacher educa- tion: A review of empirical studies. Teaching Education, 24(4), 345-380.
11. Coskun, A. & Daloglu, A. (2010). Evaluating an English language teacher education program through Peacock’s model. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(6), 24−42.
12. Council of Higher Education (COHE) (2014). Higher education system in Tur- key. Retrieved from http://www.yok.gov.tr/documents/10348274/10733291/ TR%27de+Y%C3%Bcks ek%C3%B6%C4%9Fretim+Sistemi2.pdf/9027552a- 962f-4b03-8450-3d1ff8d56ccc. 25.01.2017
13. Ekmekçi, F. Ö. (1992). Problems encountered in teacher training sessions for teacher training programs. In Tradition and innovation: ELT and teacher training in the 1990s, (Vol. 2). Ankara: Hacettepe University & the British Council.
14. Farrell, T. S. C. (2008). ‘Here’s the book, go teach the class’: ELT practicum support. RELC Journal, 39(2), 226−241.
15. Gan, Z. (2013). Learning to teach English language in the practicum: What challenges do non-native ESL student teachers face? Australian Journal of Teacher Educa- tion, 38(3), 92-108.
16. Genç, Z. S. (2016). More practice for pre-service teachers and more theory for in- service teachers of English language. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 677-683.
17. Grudnoff, L. (2011). Rethinking the practicum: Limitations and possibilities. Asia- Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3), 223-234.
18. Gurvitch, R., & Metzler, M. W. (2009). The effects of laboratory-based and field-based practicum experience on pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(3), 437-443.
19. Hubbard, P. (2008). CALL and the future of language teacher education. CALICO Journal, 25(2), 175-188.
20. Kirkgoz, Y. (2007). English language teaching in Turkey: Policy changes and their implementations. RELC Journal, 38(2), 216-228.
21. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2012). Language Teacher Education for A Global Society: A Modular Model For Knowing, Analyzing, Recognizing, Doing and Seeing. New York: Routledge.
22. Lange, D. L. (1990). A blueprint for a teacher development program. In J. C. Richards & D. Nunan (Eds.), Second language teacher education (pp. 245−268). Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Mattsson, M., Eilertsen, T. V., & Rorrison, D. (2011). What is practice in teacher edu- cation? In M. Mattsson, T. V. Eilertsen, & D. Rorrison (Eds.), A practicum Turn in Teacher Education (pp. 1−15). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
24. Mau, R. Y. (1997) Concerns of student teachers: Implications for improving the practi- cum. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 25(1), 53-65.
25. MEB (2016). Retrieved from http://www.personelmebhaber.net/mebbis-meb-gov- tr/mebbis-uygulama-ogrencisi-degerlendirme-modulu-acildi-h36297.html. 25.01.2017
26. Merç, A. (2010). Self-reported problems of pre-service EFL teachers throughout teach- ing practicum. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 199-226.
27. Merç, A. (2015). Assessing the performance in EFL teaching practicum: Student teach- ers’ views. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(2), 44-56.
28. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.). California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
29. Moore, R. (2003). Reexamining the field experiences of preservice teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 31-42.
30. Owen, J. M. (2007). Program Evaluation: Forms and Approaches (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
31. Peacock, M. (2009). The evaluation of foreign-language-teacher education pro- grammes. Language Teaching Research, 13(3), 259−278.
32. Richards, J. C. (1998). Beyond Training: Perspectives on Language Teacher Educa- tion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Seferoğlu, G. (2006). Teacher candidates’ reflections on some components of a pre- service English teacher education programme in Turkey. Journal of Education for Teaching: International research and pedagogy, 32(4), 369−378.
34. Sifakis, N. C., & Bayyurt, Y. (2015). Insights from ELF and WE in teacher training in Greece and Turkey. World Englishes, 34(3), 471-484.
35. Şallı-Çopur, D. (2008). Teacher effectiveness in initial years of service: A case study on the graduates of METU foreign language education program. (Doctoral dis- sertation, Middle East Technical University). Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist. psu.edu/ viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.634.514&rep=rep1&type=pdf
36. Williams-Pettway, M. L. (2005). Novice teachers’ assessment of their teacher educa- tion programs. (Doctoral dissertation, Auburn University). Retrieved from http:// citeseerx .ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1017.2456&rep=rep1&type =pdf
37. Yan, C., & He, C. (2010). Transforming the existing model of teaching practicum: A study of Chinese EFL student teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36(1), 57-73.
38. Yuan, R., & Lee, I. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ changing beliefs in the teaching practicum: Three cases in an EFL context. System, 44, 1-12.