University Students` Perception and Utilization of Technology for Learning: The Case of Haramaya University

Year 2017, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 139 - 156, 01.09.2017

Sisay Awgichew Wondemetegegn

Abstract

As technology has become more prevalent and accessible to students in their personal lives, learning experiences and interaction, it has encouraged students to engage and generate innovative and creative ideas and sharing learning experiences. This paper examines university students` perceptions and utilization of technology for learning at Haramaya University in Ethiopia. The researcher used survey research design with a questionnaire as principal data collection instrument. The participants (n=298) were sampled using purposive, heterogeneity and systematic random sampling techniques. The finding of the study revealed that there was no statistically significant mean difference between male and female students’ perceptions towards technology utilization for learning (t (296) = t -.102, p>0.05, p=0.919).This was the same for students who came from rural and urban areas (t (296) = t= -.126, p>0.05, p=0.900) and students have positive perception towards technology assisted learning

Keywords

Technology Utilization for Learning, Students` Perception

References

• Adedeji, O.A. (2010). The Development of Modern Information and Communications Technology in Ibadan: Creative Educational Publication Ltd.
• Austin, M. J. & Brown, L.D. (1999). Internet plagiarism: Developing strategies to curb student academic dishonesty. The internet and Higher Education, 2(1), 21-33.
• Azhar, M., Nasir, H. B. & Farah, N. (2011). Effects of use of ICT: students` perception at higher education level. Elixir Social Studies, 38(2011), 4118-4221.
• Belal, A.R. (2011) “students` perception of computer assisted learning: an empirical study”, International Journal Management in Education, 5(1), 63-78.
• Buabeng, A &Yidana, I.(2015). Innovation in education: Students` perception of imp- lementing ICT in learning in second-cycle institution in Ghana: 7th World Con- ferences on Educational Sciences, (WCES-2015), 05-07 February 2015, Novotel Athens Convention center, Athens, Greece. www. Sciencedirect.com. Retrieved from Elsevier, in 2017.
• Cavas, B. & Cavas, P. (2009). A study on sciences teachers` attitudes towards and communication technology in education: TOJET, 8(2), 20-32.
• Clegg, S., Hudson, A., &Steel, J. (2003). The emperor`s New Clothes: globalization and e-learning in higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(1), 39-53.
• Christina, K. & Lars, C. (2002). Students’ perception of e-learning in university educa- tion. Journal of Educational Media, 27(1), 2.
• Connel, S. L. (2006). Comparing blogs, wikis, and discussion boards as collaborative learning tools. In wiki, Hyderabad: India: ICFAI (the Institute of Financial Ana- lysts of India) University Press.
• Dorup, J. (2004). Experience and attitudes towards information technology among first year medical students in Denmark: Longitudinal questionnaire survey. Jour- nal of Medical Internet Research, 6(1), 10.
• Gay, L. R. & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational Research: Competencies’ for Analysis and Applications (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
• Gay, G. &Blades, R. (2005). Information Technology for CXC CSEC, Oxford Univer- sity Press, UK.
• GTP-II- (2015/16-2019/20). Growth and Transformation Plan II (GTP-II-). National Planning Commission, Vol. I. Main text. May 2016. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
• Hawkins, R.J. (2002). Ten Lessons for ICT and Education in the Developing World. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Hazemi, R. &Hailes, S. (2002). The Digital University-Building a Learning Commu- nity. London, Springer.
• Huczynski, A. & Johnston, S.P. (2005) ‘Engineering students use of computer assisted learning (CAL)’, European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), 287-298.
• Kennewell, S. (2001). Using affordance and constraints to evaluate the use of informa- tion and communication technology in teaching and learning. Journal of Informa- tion Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1-2), 101-116.
• Kozman, R.B. (2005). National policies that connect ICT- based education reform to economic and social development. An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environment, 1(2), 117-156.
• Kubiatko, M. & Halakova, Z. (2009). Slovak high school students’ attitudes to ICT using in Biology lesson. Computer in Human Behavior, 25, 743-748.
• Liu, P-L., Chen, C-J. &Chang, Y-J. (2010) “Effects of a computer-assisted concept mapping learning strategy on EFL college students” English reading comprehen- sion, Computer &Education, 54(2), 436-445.
• Miranda, H. & Russell, M. (2011). Predictors of teachers directed students’ use of technology in elementary classrooms: A multilevel SEM approach using data from the USEIT study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 301-323. Retrieved from EBSCO host.
• Marc, L. & Mariana, D. (2014). ICT as an Enabler of Transformation in Ethiopian. www.world bank.org/ICT
• Mizrachi, D., &Shoham, S. (2004). Computer attitudes and library anxiety among undergraduates: a study of Israel B. Ed students. International Information and Library Review, 36(2), 29-38.
• Papaioannou, P. & Charalambous, K. (2011). Principles` attitudes towards ICT and their participations about the factors that facilitate or inhibit ICT integration in primary schools of Cyprus. Journal of Information Technology Education, 10, 333-347.
• Rockwell, S. C., & Singleton, L. A. (2007). The effect of the modality of presenta- tion of streaming multimedia on information acquisition. Media Psychology, 9(1), 179-191.
• Sangster, A. (1992). ‘Computer-based instruction in accounting’, Accounting Educa- tion: An International Journal, 1(1), 13-32.
• Schmid, E.C. (2008). Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the English language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard technol- ogy. Computer and Education, 51, 1553-1568.
• Selwyn, N. (2007) “The use of computer technology in university teaching and learn- ing: a critical perspective”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2),83-94.
• Seyal, A. H., Rahim, M. & N.A. (2002). A study of computer attitudes of non-com- puting students of technical college in Burnei Darussalam. Journal of End User Computing, 14(2), 40-47.
• Thomas L. T., M. & Jill, A. (2009). Students’ perception of teaching technologies, ap- plication of technologies, and academic performance. ELSEVIER. Computer & Education, 53, 1241-1255.
• UNESCO. (2004). Use of Technology. Retrieved from: http://portal.unesco.org/educa- tion/en/ev.
• Webster, J. & Hackley, P. (1997). Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated dis- tance learning (special research forum on teaching effectiveness in the organiza- tional sciences). Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1287-1310.
• William, M. L., Paprock, K. & Covington, B. (1999). Distance Learning. The Essen- tial Guide. Sage Publications, Thousand and Oaks.