Three Birds with a Stone: Technology Integration in Language Education with Reverse Mentoring Model

Year 2017, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 177 - 190, 01.09.2017

Belgin Aydın

Abstract

Technology integration in education, how to do it effectively, how to help teachers gain the necessary competencies are among the most discussed topics in recent years. It is also known that in-service teacher training is full of problems and the desired outcomes cannot be achieved easily. Teacher training programs cannot equip future teachers with the required technological competencies. Reverse Mentoring Model suggested in this study is thought to help both pre- and in-service teachers to gain technopedagogical knowledge. By restructuring the teaching practice process, one of the most important components of teacher education programs, pre-service teachers, more equipped with technology knowledge, will mentor their in-service teacher during the teacher practice process, creating an environment in which both group of teachers will be learning from each other. The digital pool that will be developed as the output of the proposed model will include digital materials aligned with the curriculum

Keywords

Technology Integration in Education, Reverse Mentoring Model, In-service Teacher Training, Pre-Service Education, Teaching Practice, English Language Education, Digital Pool

References

• Aydın, B. (2008). An e-class application in a Distance English Language Teacher Training program (DELTT): Turkish learners’ perceptions. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(2), 157-168.
• Basal, A. (2015). Perceptions of pre-service English teachers towards the integration of an LMS into English language teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23(4), 485-507.
• Bilgin, İ., Tatar, E., & Ay, Y. (2012). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının teknolojiye karşı tutumlarının Teknolojik Pedegojik Alan Bilgisi (TPAK)’ ne katkısının incelen- mesi. X. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi. Niğde: Niğde Üni- versitesi.
• Brush, T., Glazewski, K., Rutowski, K., Berg, K., Stromfors, C., Van-Nest, M., Stock, L., & Sutton, J. (2003). Integrating technology in a field-based teacher training program. Educaional Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 57-72.
• Bümen, N. T., Ateş, A., Çakar, E., Ural, G. & Acar, V. (2012). Türkiye bağlamında öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimi: Sorunlar ve öneriler, Millî Eğitim, 194, 31-49.
• Chaudhuri, S. & Ghosh, R. (2012). Reverse mentoring a social exchange tool for keep- ing the boomers engaged and millennials committed. Human Resource Develop- ment Review, 11(1), 55-76.
• Chen, Y. C. (2013). Effect of reverse mentoring on traditional mentoring functions. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 13 (3), 199-2013.
• Çoklar A. N., Kılıçer, K., & Odabaşı, H. F. (2007). Eğitimde Teknoloji Kullanımına Eleştirel Bir Bakış: Teknopedagoji. 7. Uluslararası Eğitim Teknolojileri Konferansı, Lefkoşe, KKTC, 69-75.
• Denton, J. J., Davis, T. J., Smith, B. L., Strader, R. A., Clark, F. E., & Wang, L. (2006). Technology mentor fellowship program: A technology integration professional development model for classroom teachers. National Forum of Teacher Educa- tion Journal-Electronic, 16(3), 1-13.
• Erdemir, N. & Bakırcı, H. & Eyduran, E. (2009) Öğretmen adaylarının eğitimde teknolojiyi kullanabilme özgüvenlerinin tespiti. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 6( 3), 99-108.
• Franklin, T., Turner, S., Kariuki, M., & Duran, M. (2001). Mentoring overcomes barri- ers to technology integration. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18(1), 26-31.
• Gallo-Fox, J. & Scantlebury, K. (2016). Coteaching as professional development for cooperating teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 191-201.
• Graham, L. (2008). Teachers are digikids too: The digital histories and digital lives of young teachers in English primary schools. Literacy, 42 (1), 10-18.
• Gomez, M. L., Schieble, M., Curwood, J., S. & Hassett, D. (2010). Technology, learn- ing and instruction: Distributed cognition in the secondary English classroom. Literacy, 44 (1). 20-27.
• Gömleksiz, M. N. (2004). Use of education technology in English classes. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(2), 71-77.
• Kabakçı, I. & Tanyeri, T. (2006). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme dersi kapsamında öğretim araçlarına ilişkin görüşlerinin karşılaştırılması. 6. Uluslararası Eğitim Teknolojileri Konferansı, Gazimağusa, KKTC.
• Kessler, G. (2006). Assessing CALL teacher training: What are we doing and what could we do better? P. Hubbard, & M. Levy (Ed.), Teacher Education in CALL içinde (ss. 23-43). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
• Kılıçer, K. (2011) Öğretimde etkili teknoloji kullanımı: Tekno-Pedagojik eğitim. H.F. Odabaşı (Ed.), İngilizce Öğretmenliğinde Öğretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Tasarımı içinde (ss. 55-75). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Kılınç, A. & Salman, S.(2006) Fen ve matematik alanları öğretmen adaylarında bilgisa- yar okuryazarlığı. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2), 150-166.
• Kocasaraç, H. (2003) Bilgisayarların öğretim alanında kullanımına ilişkin öğretmen yeterlikleri. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET. 2(3), 77-85.
• Koehler, M. J. & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowl- edge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
• Kudat, C. (2008) Eğitim Fakülteleri Yabancı Diller Eğitimi Bölümlerinde Okul Deney- imi Ve Öğretmenlik Uygulaması: Uygulamalar – Sorunlar – Öneriler. http://www.eab.org.tr/eab/oc/egtconf/pdfkitap/pdf/277.pdf (pp. 138-155).
• Kwan, T. & Real, L. F. (2005). Mentors’ perceptions of their roles in mentoring student teachers. Asia Pasific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 275-287.
• Leahy, M. & Twomey, D. (2005). Using web design with pre-service teachers as a means of creating a collaborative learning environment. Educational Media In- ternational, 42(2), 143-151.
• Leh, A. S. C. (2005). Lessons learned from service learning and reverse mentoring in faculty development: A case study in technology training. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 25-41.
• Luke, L. C. & Britten, S. J. (2007). The expanding role of technology in foreign lan- guage teacher education programs. CALICO Journal, 24(2), 253-267.
• Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedegojical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teacher College Record. 108(6), 1017- 1054.
• MEB. (2008). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve Eğitimi Genel Müdürlüğü 8.03.2008 tarihli B.08.0.0EG.0.13.01.04-/1835 sayılı açıklaması.
• MEB, (2010). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığında Hizmet içi Eğitimin Yeniden Yapılandırılması Panel ve Çalıştayı, Ankara. http://hedb.meb.gov.tr/net/_Duyuru_dosyalar/cal- istay.pdf adresinden 07.03.2013
• Murphy, W. M. (2012). Reverse mentoring at work: Fostering cross generational learn- ing and developin milennial leaders. Human Resource Management, 51(4), 549- 574.
• National Council of Teachers of English. (2007). 21st-century Literacies: A Policy Research Brief Produced By The National Council Of Teachers Of English. Re- trieved: 17 July 2012, http://www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/PolicyR esearch/21stCenturyResearchBrief.pdf
• Nunan, D. (1999) A foot in the world of ideas: Graduate study through the İnternet. Language Learning and Technology, 3(1), 52–74.
• Pace, B. G ., Rodesiler,L. B., & Tripp, L., (2010). Pre-service English teachers and Web 2.0: teaching & learning literacy with digital applications. D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology Teacher Educa- tion International Conference içinde (36, ss. 2335-2342).
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigtants Part I. On the Horizon, 9(1), 1-6.
• Reinders, H. (2009). Technology and second language teacher education. Burns, A. & Richards, J. C. (Ed.). Second Language Teacher Education içinde, (ss. 230-237). New York: CUP.
• Rilling, S., Dahlman, A., Dodson, S., Boyles, C., & Pazvant, O. (2005). Connecting CALL theory and practice in preservice teacher education and beyond: Processes and products. CALICO Journal, 22 (2), 213-235.
• Robb, T. (2006). Helping teachers to help themselves. In P. Hubbard, & M. Levy (Ed.), Teacher Education in CALL (pp. 335-347). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
• Sharma, P. & Barrett, B. (2008). Blended Learning: Using Technology in and Beyond the Language Classroom. Oxford: Macmillan.
• Solvie, P., & Sunger, E. (2012). Teaching for success: Technology and learning styles in preservice teacher education. Contemporary Issues İn Technology And Teacher Education, 12(1), 6-40.
• Stobaugh, R. R., McDonald, M., & Tassell, J. L. (2010). Student teacher use of tech- nology to facilitate teaching and learning. Maddux, C. D., Gibson, D., Dodge, B. (Ed.), Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education. Society for Information Tecnology & Teacher Education (SITE), (ISBN # 1-880094-82-7) Available at: site.aace.org
• Stuhlman, J. (1998). A model for ınfusing technology into teacher training programs. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 6(2-3), 1125-1140.
• Szebrat, C. (2012). Reverse mentoring: Embracing what millennials can teach oth- ers. Available from: https://www.td.org/Publications/Blogs/Human-Capital- Blog/2012/10/Reverse-Mentoring-Embracing-What-Millennials-Can-Teach- Others
• TALIS 2013 Results an International Perspective on Teaching and Learn- ing (2013). Available from: http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Man- agement/oecd/education/talis-2013-results_9789264196261-en#page111D OI:10.1787/9789264196261-en
• Tan, L. & Teo, T. (2012). The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and pre-service teachers’ technology acceptance: A validation study using Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 20(1), 89-104
• Wang, M. & Shen, R. (2011). Message design for mobile learning: Learning theories, human cognition and design principles. British Journal Of Educational Technol- ogy, 43(4), 561-575.
• Willis, J., Thompson, A., & Sadera, W. (1999). Research on technology and teacher education: Current status and future directions. Educational Technology Research And Development. 47(4), 29-45.
• Yaşar, Ş., Odabaşı, H. F., & Gürcan, A. (1997). İlköğretim 1. Kademede görev- li öğretmenlerin öğretme-öğrenme süreçlerinde araç-gereçlerden yararlanma durumları. Çukurova Üniversitesi 3. Ulusal Sınıf Öğretmenliği Sempozyumu, Adana.
• Yurdakul, I. K. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının teknopedagojik eğitim yeterliklerinin bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin kullanımları açısından incelenmesi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40, 397-408.
• Zachary, L. J. & Fischler, L. A. (2009). The Mentee’s Guide Making Mentoring Work For You. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.