RESTRUCTURING GOVERNMENTS USING A GEOMETRIC RATIO TECHNIQUE AND ITS MULTIPLE EFFECTS

Abstract

In this study, restructuring of states according to a Geometric Ratio Technique (GRT) is proposed for future developments. To visualise and simulate the restructuring, a pyramid figure is used with four layers. These layers are identified as 1L, 2L, 3L and 4L from top to down. The layer 1L shows the core size of a state government with all its staff. The power multiplier is 1 and the personnel size is found to be 1.562% of its population. The Layer 2L is generally constituted of security. Within this layer, there are three groups of security namely military, police and others. These security sectors are represented as a whole with a top management. The power multiplier of this layer is 3 and the personnel size is found to be 4.687%. The third layer 3L is research and development (R&D) layer. Currently, R&D layer is institutionally not established well in state governments worldwide. The power multiplier of this layer is 12 and its personnel size is found to be 18.75%. This layer is extremely important for the future. In terms of creating added value, it has 4 fold effects on the economy in positive or negative ways. On the other hand, it has 0.3 fold upward effect on state governments. Sectoral R&Ds in this layer are (a) agriculture, food, forestry, animal husbandry and associated industries, (b) IT, electronics and defence and (c) the remaining sectors. Proportional sizes of these sectors are assumed to be equal. The last layer 4L is production layer. Production of goods and services based on the R&Ds are done at this layer. Again, sectors in this layer are assumed to be equal in terms of quantity and importance. This layer is constituted of skilled and unskilled employees. The power multiplier of the fourth layer is 48 and the personnel size is found to be 75%. Any production beyond the identification of this study is also considered within this layer.

A GRT is used to calculate these layers and associated segments. The geometric ratio used is quite similar to the golden ratio with 3.39% error. The geometric sequence (2N + 1) is used in expanding and shrinking the layers. Sectors studied in this article are assumed to have equal size and importance. Consequently, extending and reducing rates are also assumed to be the same. Agriculture, food, animal husbandary, forestry and associated industries are studied as an integrated unified single sector.

Finally, current and future developments would require states and large companied to be restructured. Budget cuts, new investments, growths, changes, etc. are always strategic issues of governments. Establishments may expand or shrink their structures. This article shows how such restructuring could be performed according to a GRT. Furthermore, effects and consequences are also calculated with respect to changes in different segments. 

Keywords

• Geometric Series,Restructuring Organisations,Change Management,Golden Ratio,Geometric Ratio,Strategic Management,Redistribution of Wealth,Budget Cuts,Economic Growths

References

1. 1. Yongxin Liao, Fernando Deschamps, Eduardo de Freitas Rocha Loures & Luiz Felipe Pierin Ramos “Past, present and future of Industry 4.0 - a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal”, International Journal of Production Research, Volume 55, 2017 - Issue 12.
2. 2. Sabina Jeschike, “Cyber Physical Systems, History, Presence and Future”, RWTH university, Feb.27.2013.
3. 3. Greengard, S. (2015). The Internet of Things. Boston MA. MIT,
4. 4. Almada-Lobo, F. (2016). The Industry 4.0 revolution and the future of manufacturing, execution systems (MES). Journal of Innovation Management, 3, 16-21.
5. 5. Ning, H., Liu, H. (2015). Cyber-physical-social-thinking space based science and technology framework for the Internet of things. Science China Information Sciences, 58, 1-19.
6. 6. Alasdair Gilchrist (auth.), Industry 4.0: The Industrial Internet of Things, Apress, ISBN:978-1-4842-2046-7, 978-1-4842-2047-4, 2016.
7. 7. Sabina Jeschke, Christian Brecher, Houbing Song, Danda B. Rawat (eds.), Industrial Internet of Things: Cybermanufacturing Systems, Springer International Publishing, ISBN:978-3-319-42559-7, 978-3-319-42558-0, 2017.
8. 8. Jordi Mongay Batalla, George Mastorakis, Constandinos X. Mavromoustakis, Evangelos Pallis (eds.), Beyond the Internet of Things: Everything Interconnected, Springer, 2017.

9. 9. Beniamino Di Martino, Kuan-Ching Li, Laurence T. Yang, Antonio Esposito (eds.), “Internet of Everything: Algorithms, Methodologies, Technologies and Perspectives”, Springer Singapore, 2018
10. 10. Marwedel, Peter, Embedded System Design : Embedded Systems, Foundations of Cyber-Physical Systems, and the Internet of Things, Springer International Publishing, Imprint, Springer, 2018
11. 11. Rajeev Alur, “Principles of Cyber-Physical Systems”, MIT Press, 2015.
12. 12. Edward Ashford Lee, Sanjit Arunkumar Seshia, “Introduction to embedded systems: a cyber-physical systems approach”, MIT Press, 2017.
13. 13. Lihui Wang, Xi Vincent Wang, “Cloud-Based Cyber-Physical Systems in Manufacturing”, Springer International Publishing, 2018.
14. 14. Edmund M. Clarke Jr., Orna Grumberg, Doron A. Peled, “Model Checking”, MIT Press 1999.15. Christel Baier, Joost-Pieter Katoen, Kim Guldstrand Larsen, “Principles of Model Checking” MIT Press, 2008.
15. 16. Remzi Yıldırım, “Mass-Volume Change and HASER (Hadron Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation) Mathematics Model” August 2016, IJESC.
16. 17. T. C. Ministry of Finance Annual Economic Report 2015.
17. 18. Cyranoski, D. Gilbert, N. Ledford, H. Nayar, A. and Yahia, M. ‘The PhD Factory’, NATURE, 276, VOL: 472. 21 April 2011.
18. 19. Science and Economic Indicadors 2010
19. 20. Dr. Mustafa AYDIN, Foreing Economic Relations Board, İstanbul Mart 2013
20. 21. "Graph: Civilian labor force (seasonally adjusted)”, Data www.bls.gov, Retrieved 2016-12-07.
21. 22. Macready, C. , Tucker, C. Who Goes WhereandWhy? An Overviewand Analysis of Global Education Mobility Fifth in a series of Global EducationResearchReports, 2011, OECD-Education at a Glance 2010.
22. 23. OECD- Education at a Glance 2012, Table.C3.1. Annex3, www.oecd.org/edu/eag2012, Referans years 2009.