A SYNTHESIZED AHP-SPEARMAN MODEL FOR MENSURATION THE SEGREGATION OF PREFERENCES FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM ENHANCEMENT

Year 2019, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 103 - 112, 30.01.2019

Sarbast Moslem Szabolcs Duleba

https://doi.org/10.33773/jum.506500

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Latterly, a superior utilization of public
transport can be a remedy to mitigate the traffic especially in big cities, thereby,
to environmental, economic and public health problems. However, the alternatives
for reclamation are myriad and in spite of this consensus of necessity, reclamation
decisions are often censured by the public. Predominantly, a significant
difference can be detected between planners’ and passengers’ notion about
amelioration matter. The aim of this paper is to enumerate public demand for
public bus transport improvement, by analyzing public bus transport supply
quality criteria between planners and public in Mersin City, Turkey. As a
methodology, a combined Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Spearman
correlation technique have been applied in order to illuminate the chasms
between planners and public.

Keywords

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, public transport, multi criteria decision making (MCDM), supply quality

References

• Buehler, R. and Pucher, J., Making public transport financially sustainable. Transport Policy, 18(1), pp.126-138 (2011).Duleba, S.; Mishina, T.; Shimazaki, Y. A dynamic analysis on public bus transport’s supply quality by using AHP, Transport, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 268–275 (2012).Safe, accountable, flexible, efficient transportation equity act: A legacy for users, US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, (2005).Nassereddine M., Eskandari H. An integrated MCDM approach to evaluate public transportation system in Tehran, Transportation Research, Part A, Policy and Practice, Vol. 106, pp. 427‒439 (2017).Mardani A., Zavadskas E. K., Khalifah Z., Jusoh A., Nor K. M. Application of multiple-criteria decision-making techniques and approaches to evaluating of service quality: a systematic review of the literature, Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 1034‒1068 (2015).Nosal, K. and Solecka, K., Application of AHP method for multi-criteria evaluation of variants of the integration of urban public transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 3, pp.269-278 (2014).Soner, O., Celik, E. and Akyuz, E., Application of AHP and VIKOR methods under interval type 2 fuzzy environment in maritime transportation. Ocean Engineering, 129, pp.107-116 (2017).Güner, S., Measuring the quality of public transportation systems and ranking the bus transit routes using multi-criteria decision making techniques. Case Studies on Transport Policy (2018).Saaty T. L. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 234–281 (1977). Saaty, T.L., How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces, 24(6), pp.19-43 (1994).Saaty, T.L., Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Management science, 32(7), pp.841-855 (1986).Harker, P.T. and Vargas, L.G., The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty's analytic hierarchy process. Management science, 33(11), pp.1383-1403 (1987).Escobar, M.T., Aguarón, J. and Moreno-Jiménez, J.M., A note on AHP group consistency for the row geometric mean priorization procedure. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), pp.318-322 (2004).Bonett, D.G. and Wright, T.A., Sample size requirements for estimating Pearson, Kendall and Spearman correlations. Psychometrika, 65(1), pp.23-28 (2000).