Sanayi Ülkelerinde Mimarlık Tarihi Eğitimi: Kuramsal Yaklaşımlar ve Uygulamalar

Year 2025, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 26 - 46, 30.06.2025

Aras Kahraman

https://doi.org/10.70370/kapu.1648184

Abstract

Bu çalışma, sanayi ülkelerinde mimarlık tarihi eğitiminin farklı akademik modeller üzerinden nasıl şekillendiğini inceleyerek, tarih eğitiminin tasarım pratiği ve diğer disiplinlerle olan ilişkisini değerlendirmektedir. Mimarlık tarihi eğitimi, ülkeden ülkeye farklılaşmaktadır; ancak genel olarak tarih derslerinin yalnızca kronolojik ve üslup analizi odaklı olmaktan çıktığı, disiplinler arası bir yaklaşımla ele alındığı görülmektedir.
Araştırmada İngiltere ve ABD gibi ülkelerde mimarlık tarihi eğitiminin genellikle sanat tarihi ve eleştirel kuram ile ilişkili olarak bağımsız bir disiplin şeklinde ele alındığı, buna karşın Hollanda ve Belçika'da tarih derslerinin tasarım stüdyolarıyla entegre edildiği tespit edilmiştir. Almanya, Avusturya ve İsviçre'de daha teknik ve mühendislik odaklı bir tarih eğitimi söz konusu iken, Fransa ve Japonya'da tarih dersleri kentsel miras ve koruma perspektifiyle sunulmaktadır.
Bu farklı yaklaşımlar, sanayi ülkelerinde mimarlık tarihi eğitiminin çeşitli modeller üzerinden geliştiğini ve ortak bir yaklaşım benimsenmediğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bazı ülkeler tarih eğitimini tasarım pratiğiyle birleştirirken, bazıları onu bağımsız bir disiplin olarak sürdürmeyi tercih etmektedir. Türkiye’de ise mimarlık tarihi eğitimi genellikle kronolojik ve üslup analizi odaklı bir şekilde yürütülmekte olup, sanayi ülkelerindeki farklı modeller, bu yaklaşımın yeniden değerlendirilmesi gerekliliğini ortaya koymaktadır. Mimarlık tarihi eğitiminin gelecekte hangi yönde ilerlemesi gerektiği konusunda akademik bir mutabakat olmamakla birlikte, farklı yaklaşımlardan çıkarılacak derslerin mimarlık eğitiminin genel yapısını şekillendirmeye devam edeceği düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

Mimarlık tarihi , mimari pratik , sanayi ülkeleri , eğitim modelleri

Architectural History Education in Industrialized Countries: Theoretical Approaches and Applications

Abstract

This study examines how architectural history education has evolved across various academic models in industrialized countries, assessing its relationship with architectural practice and other disciplines. Architectural history education varies from country to country; however, it is generally observed that history courses have moved beyond a purely chronological and stylistic analysis, adopting an interdisciplinary approach.
The study identifies that in countries such as the United Kingdom and the United States, architectural history education is typically treated as an independent discipline associated with art history and critical theory. In contrast, history courses are integrated into design studios in the Netherlands and Belgium. In Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, architectural history education is more technically and engineering-oriented, whereas in France and Japan, it is delivered through the lens of urban heritage and conservation.
These diverse approaches indicate that architectural history education in industrialized countries has developed through various models without a universally accepted framework. While some countries integrate history education with architectural practice, others maintain it as an independent academic discipline. In Turkey, architectural history education is traditionally structured around chronological and stylistic analysis. However, different educational models in industrialized nations suggest the necessity of reevaluating this approach. Although there is no academic consensus on the future trajectory of architectural history education, insights drawn from diverse methodologies will likely continue to shape the overall structure of architectural education.

Keywords

Architectural history , architectural practice , industrialized countries , educational models

References

• Akkach, S. (2001). Useful Obsessions: Architecture as Cultural Critique. Manuscript.
• Anderson, R. L. (1949). The function of history in architectural education. Journal of Architectural Education, 4(1), 30-35.
• Anderson, S. (1999). Architectural history in schools of architecture. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 58(3), 282-290.
• Antoniades, A. C. (1992). Poetics of architecture: Theory of design. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
• Banham, R. (1960). Theory and Design in the First Machine Age. Architectural Press.
• Bergdoll, B. & Thomine, A. (2002). Teaching architectural history in France: A shifting institutional landscape. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 61(4), 509-518.
• Chafee, R. (1977). The teaching of architecture at the école des Beaux-Arts. In A. Drexler (Ed.), The Architecture of the École des Beaux-Arts (pp. 61-109). New York: The Museum of Modern Art.
• Chastel, A. (1990). L'Invention de l'Inventaire [Envanterin Keşfi]. Revue de l'Art, 87, 5-11.
• Collins, P. (1998). Changing ideals in modern architecture, 1750-1950. McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP.
• Colquhoun, A. (1981). Essays in Architectural Criticism: Modern Architecture and Historical Change. MIT Press.
• Columbia University. (n.d.). Architecture History I. Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation. https://www.arch.columbia.edu/courses/13598-243-architecture-history-i
• Conway, H., & Roenisch, R. (1994). Understanding Architecture: An Introduction to Architecture and Architectural History. Routledge.
• De Jonge, K. (2000). Architectural history in Belgium: A disciplinary and educational perspective. Architectural Histories, 6(2), 145-160.
• École Nationale Supérieure d'Architecture de Paris-Belleville. (n.d.-a). Cursus. https://www.paris-belleville.archi.fr/trainings/cursus/?lang=en
• École Nationale Supérieure d'Architecture de Paris-Belleville. (n.d.-b). Programme détaillé – semestre 1 (2023-2024). https://www.paris-belleville.archi.fr/app/uploads/2023/09/PROGRAMME-DETAILLE-sem-1-2023-24.pdf
• École Nationale Supérieure d'Architecture de Paris-Belleville. (n.d.-c). DSA Architecture et Patrimoine. https://www.paris-belleville.archi.fr/trainings/specialisation/dsa-architecture-et-patrimoine/?lang=en
• ETH Zürich. (2024). Department of Architecture - History and Theory. https://arch.ethz.ch/en/departement/geschichte.html
• Foucault, M. (1999). Bilginin arkeolojisi (V. Urhan, Çev.). İstanbul: Birey Yayıncılık.
• Frampton, K. (1983). Towards a critical regionalism: Six points for an architecture of resistance. In H. Foster (Ed.), The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture (pp. 16-30). Port Townsend, WA: Bay Press.
• Frampton, K. (2020). Modern architecture: A critical history (5th ed.). Thames & Hudson.
• Frampton, K., & Latour, A. (1980). Notes on American architectural education from the end of the nineteenth century until the 1970s. Lotus, 27, 9-15.
• Fujimori, T. (1993). Nihon no Kindai Kenchiku [Modern Japon Mimarlığı]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
• Ghent University. (n.d.-a). Theory and History of Architecture Research Group. https://www.ugent.be/ea/architectuur/en/research/research-groups/theory-and-history-of-architecture
• Giedion, S. (1968). Space, Time and Architecture: The Growth of a New Tradition. Harvard University Press.
• Gropius, W. (1971). Programme of the Staatliches Bauhaus in Weimar',(1919). Programmes and manifestoes on Twentieth-Century Architecture.
• Harvard University. (n.d.). Department of History of Art and Architecture. https://haa.fas.harvard.edu/
• Hays, K. M. (1995). Modernism and the Posthumanist Subject: The Architecture of Hannes Meyer and Ludwig Hilberseimer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Heynen, H. (1999). Architecture and Modernity: A Critique. MIT Press.
• Heynen, H., & de Jonge, K. (2002). The teaching of architectural history and theory in Belgium and the Netherlands. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 61(3), 335-345.
• Historic England. (2025). Historic England Archive. https://historicengland.org.uk
• Howard, D. (2002). Teaching architectural history in Great Britain and Australia: Local Conditions and Global Perspectives. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 61(3), 346-354.
• Jencks, C. (1986). What is post-modernism?. Academy Editions.
• Johnson, P. A. (1994). The Theory of Architecture: Concepts Themes & Practices. John Wiley & Sons.
• Kostof, S. (1995). A History of Architecture: Settings and Rituals. Oxford University Press.
• KU Leuven. (n.d.). History, Theory and Criticism of Architecture. https://architectuur.kuleuven.be/departementarchitectuur/english/research-projects/history-theory-and-criticism-of-architecture
• Kyoto University OpenCourseWare. (2022). History of World Architecture. https://ocw.kyoto-u.ac.jp/en/syllabus/?act=detail&syllabus_id=tech_5179&year=2022
• Kyoto University. (n.d.-a). History of Architecture. https://www.ar.t.kyoto-u.ac.jp/en/information/laboratory/history/index.html
• Kyoto University. (n.d.-b). Architectural History, Theory, and Criticism. https://www.ar.t.kyoto-u.ac.jp/en/information/laboratory/Criticism
• Leach, A. (2015). Mimarlık tarihi nedir? (H. Doğan, Çev.). Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Macarthur, J. (2000). Some thoughts on the canon and exemplification in architecture. Form/Work: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Design in the Built Environment, 5, 33-45.
• Marantz, É. (Ed.). (2022). L'Atelier de la Recherche. Annales d'Histoire de l'Architecture #2020 et 2021#: Travaux des jeunes chercheurs en histoire de l'architecture. Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, HiCSA. https://hicsa.pantheonsorbonne.fr/sites/default/files/2023-08/marantz_2021_01book.pdf
• Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (n.d.). History, Theory, and Criticism of Architecture and Art. Department of Architecture. https://architecture.mit.edu/history-theory-criticism
• Matrix Feminist Design Co-operative. (2022). Making space: Women and the man-made environment (J. Boys, Ed.). Verso.
• Mies van der Rohe, L. (1941). The Philosophy Underlying the Teaching in Our Schools of Architecture. The Octagon, (February), 7.
• Moholy-Nagy, S. (1967). Architectural history and the student architect—A symposium. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 26(3), 178-180.
• Morgenthaler, H. (1995). Chronology versus System: Unleashing the creative potential of architectural history. Journal of Architectural Education (1984-), 48(4), 218-226.
• Necipoğlu, G. (2015). Gülru Necipoğlu’yla 'Türkiye’de Mimarlık ve Mimarlık Tarihi Eğitimi' üzerine. 5Harfliler. https://www.5harfliler.com/gulru-necipogluyla-turkiyede-mimarlik-ve-mimarlik-tarihi-egitimi-uzerine/
• Neumann, D. (2002). Teaching the history of architecture in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland: "Architekturgeschichte" vs. "Bauforschung". Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 61(3), 370-380.
• Pérouse de Montclos, J. M. (1988). Architecture: Méthode et Vocabulaire [Mimarlık: Yöntem ve Terimler]. Paris: Editions du Patrimoine.
• Pevsner, N. (2025). Pevsner Architectural Guides Online. https://yalebooks.co.uk/pevsner-architectural-guides/
• Reynolds, J. M. (2002). Teaching architectural history in Japan: Problems and perspectives. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 61(3), 350-365.
• Rossi, A. (2006). Şehrin Mimarisi (N. Gürbilek, Çev.). Kanat Yayınları.
• Summerson, J. (1980). The Classical Language of Architecture. MIT Press.
• Suzuki, H. & Yamaguchi, H. (Ed.). (1993). Kindai Gendai Kenchikushi [Erken Modern ve Çağdaş Mimarlık]. Tokyo: Shokokusha.
• Swenarton, M. (1987). The role of history in architectural education. Architectural History, 30, 201-215.
• Tafuri, M. (1980). Theories and History of Architecture. New York: Harper & Row.
• The University Museum, The University of Tokyo. (n.d.). History of Architecture. Erişim tarihi: 20 Şubat 2025, https://www.um.u-tokyo.ac.jp/academics/collection_14_History%20of%20Architecture_en.html
• Tokyo College. (n.d.). Making World Architecture History in Japan. https://www.tc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/en/research/5615/
• Tokyo Institute of Technology. (n.d.-a). Architecture and Building Engineering Graduate Major. https://www.titech.ac.jp/english/0/prospective-students/graduate-majors/arch
• TU Delft. (n.d.-a). History of architecture and urban planning. Delft University of Technology. https://www.tudelft.nl/en/bk/over-faculteit/afdelingen/architecture/organisatie/groepen/history-form-and-aesthetics/history-of-architecture-and-urban-planning
• TU Delft. (n.d.-b). History of architecture and urban planning studio. Delft University of Technology. https://www.tudelft.nl/onderwijs/opleidingen/masters/aubs/msc-architecture-urbanism-and-building-sciences/master-tracks/architecture/programme/studios/history-of-architecture-and-urban-planning
• TU Wien. (2024). Institute for History of Art, Building Archaeology and Restoration. https://ar.tuwien.ac.at/en/faculty/Institutes/Institute-of-History-of-Art-Building-Archaeology-and-Restoration
• Université Libre de Bruxelles. (n.d.). Histoire de l'architecture: Des origines à la fin du XIXe siècle https://www.ulb.be/fr/programme/2025-arch-y302
• Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne. (n.d.-a). Master parcours Architecture, ville, paysage: histoire et patrimoine (AVP) (FI). https://formations.pantheonsorbonne.fr/fr/catalogue-des-formations/master-M/master-histoire-de-l-art-KBUVEDV2/master-parcours-architecture-ville-paysage-histoire-et-patrimoine-avp-fi-KBUVFUM2.html
• Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne. (n.d.-b). Master parcours Histoire de l'Architecture (finalité Recherche). https://formations.pantheonsorbonne.fr/plugins/odf-web/odf/_content/subprogram-subprogram1-master-parcours-histoire-de-l-architecture-finalite-recherche-fr/Master%20parcours%20Histoire%20de%20l'Architecture%20(finalit%C3%A9%20Recherche).pdf
• University of Edinburgh. (2023). Our History. https://ourhistory.is.ed.ac.uk
• Upton, D. (1998). Architecture in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Watkin, D. (1980). The Rise of Architectural History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Wright, G. (1990). History for Architects. In G. Wright & J. Parks (Eds.), The History of History in American Schools of Architecture 1865-1975 (pp. 13-52). New York: Buell Center Books in American Architectural History.
• Zevi, B. (1951). Architettura e storiografia. Milan: Einaudi.