Çift Borulu Isı Değiştiricilerinin Termo Hidrolik ve Ekonomik Optimizasyonu

Year 2019, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 101 - 106, 01.01.2019

Murtaza Yıldırım Mehmet Sait Söylemez

https://doi.org/10.7212/zkufbd.v9i1.1108

Abstract

Endüstriyel uygulamalarda kullanılan karşı akışlı, boru tipi, iki akışkanın karışmadığı tür ısı değiştiricilerinin optimum alan hesabı için basit cebirsel formül veren çok değişkenli termo ekonomik ve hidrolik optimizasyon analizi sunulmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, termal, ekonomik ve hidrolik optimizasyon için bu tür ısı değiştiricilerinin termal ve akışkan analizleri ile birlikte bir ekonomik analiz yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Optimizasyon formülasyonlarının geçerliliği gerçekçi uygulamalarla kontrol edilmiştir

Keywords

Zıt alışlı ısı değiştirici, Optimizasyon, Termo ekonomik, Termo hidrolik, Karışımsız tip

Thermo Hydraulic and Economic Optimization of Double Pipe Heat Exchangers

Abstract

A multi variable thermo economic and hydraulic optimization analysis is presented yielding simple algebraic formula for estimating the optimum area of counter flow tubular heat exchangers of both fluids unmixed type which are applied in industrial applications. An economic analysis method is used in the present study, together with the thermal and fluidic analyses of such heat exchangers, for thermal, economic and hydraulic optimization. The validity of the optimization formulations was checked with realistic applications.

Keywords

Thermo economics, thermo hydraulic, counter flow heat exchanger, unmixed type, optimization.

References

• Burmeister, LC. 1998. Equipment cost estimation. In Elements of Thermal-Fluid System Design, Prentice Hall: New Jersey; 263-270.
• Chung K., Lee K., Kim, W. 2002. Optimization of the design factors for thermal performance of a parallel-flow heat exchanger. Int. J. Heat Mass. Transf., 45(24): 4773-4780.
• Cornellissen, RL., Hirs, GG. 1999. Thermodynamic optimization of a heat exchanger. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 42(5): 951-959.
• Duffie, JA., Beckman, WA. 1980. Solar process economics. In Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, Wiley: New York; 376-407.
• Edwards, DK., Matavosian, R. 1982. Thermoeconomically optimum counter flow heat exchanger effectiveness. J. Heat Trans-T Asme., 104(1): 191-193.
• Georgiadis, MC., Rotstein, GE., Macchietto, S. 1998. Optimal design and operation of heat exchangers under milk fouling. AIChE J., 44(9): 2099-2111.
• Grazzini, G., Rinaldi, R. 2001. Thermodynamic optimal design of heat exchangers for an irreversible refrigerator. Int J Therm Sci. 40(2): 173-180.
• Ibarra-Bahena, J., Romero, RJ., Velazquez-Avelar, L., Valdez- Morales, CV., Galindo-Luna, YR. 2013. Evaluation of the thermodynamic effectiveness of a plate type heat exchanger integrated into an experimental single stage heat transformer operating with Water/Carrol mixture. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 51(2): 257-263.
• Kandilli, C., Koçlu, A. 2011. Assessment of the optimum operation conditions of a pate heat exchanger for waste heat recovery in textile industry. Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev., 15: 4424-4431.
• Stoecker, WF. 1989. Design of Thermal Systems, 3rdEdn, Mc Graw-Hill: New York; 468.
• Şahin, AZ. 1997. Thermodynamic design optimization of a heat recuperator. Int. Commun. Heat Mass, 24(7): 1029-1938.
• Vojtech, T., Hajek, J., Jegla, Z., Stehlik, P. 2011. Optimum design of fluid distribution systems in heat exchangers. Asia- pac J. Chem. Eng., 6(5): 750-759.
• Wang, CC., Lee, CJ., Chang, T., Lin, SP. 2011. Heat transfer and friction correlation for compact louvered fin-and-tube heat exchangers. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 42: 1945-1956.
• Wu, SY, Zhou, SM, Xiao, L., Li, YR. 2014. Determining the optimal pinch point temperature difference of evaporator for waste heat recovery. J. Energy Inst., 87: 140-151.