Türkiye’de Orman Bölge Müdürlüklerinin Endüstriyel Odun Üretim Miktarı İstatistiklerinin Benzerliklerinin Kümeleme ve Diskriminant Analizi ile Araştırılması

Year 2019, Volume: 19 Issue: 2, 214 - 224, 30.09.2019

İlker Akyüz , Nadir Ersen Bahadır Çağrı Bayram Mustafa Acar Kadri Cemil Akyüz Tutku Üçüncü

https://doi.org/10.17475/kastorman.625588

Abstract

Çalışmanın amacı: Bu çalışmada orman
bölge müdürlüklerinin endüstriyel odun üretim miktarları detaylı bir şekilde
incelenmiş olup, endüstriyel odun üretimi bakımından bölge müdürlüklerinin
benzerlikleri küme ve diskriminant analiz yardımıyla araştırılmıştır.

Çalışma alanı: Türkiye’deki orman
bölge müdürlükleri çalışma alanını oluşturmaktadır.

Materyal ve Yöntem: Benzer özellikleri
taşıyan kümeleri oluşturmak için yedi farklı değişken kullanılmıştır. Bu
değişkenlerin 2013-2016 yıllarındaki değerlerinin ortalaması alınmıştır.
Araştırma yöntemi olarak ise kümeleme analizi ve diskriminant analizi
kullanılmıştır.

Sonuçlar: Kümeleme analizi
sonucuna göre, orman bölge müdürlüklerini en fazla 6 ve en az 2 gruba
ayrılabileceği tespit edilmiştir. Oluşturulan gruplamalardan en yüksek başarıyı
belirlemek için yürütülen ayırma analizi sonucunda orman bölge müdürlüklerinin
6’li gruplamada %100 başarı elde ettiği saptanmıştır. Ayrıca, endüstriyel odun
üretiminde en yüksek değere sahip olan Kastamonu orman bölge müdürlüğünün tek
başına bir grup oluşturduğu bulunmuştur.

Önemli Vurgular: Endüstriyel odun
üretimi için orman bölge müdürlükleri orman alanlarının kullanımı ile ilgili
çalışmalara daha fazla önem vererek dışa bağımlılığın önüne geçebiliriz.

Keywords

Endüstriyel Odun, Kümeleme Analizi, Diskriminant Analizi

Investigation of the Similarities of Industrial Wood Production Statistics of Regional Directorates of Forestry in Turkey Using Cluster and Discriminant Analysis

Abstract

Aim of study: In this study, the amount of industrial wood production of the
regional directorates of forestry in Turkey was examined deeply and the
similarities between the regional directorates in industrial wood production
were investigated by cluster and discriminant analysis.

Area of study: The study area is regional directorates of forestry in Turkey.

Material and Method: Seven different variables were used to construct similar clusters. The
arithmetic mean of these seven variables was taken for 4 years (2013-2016).  Cluster and discriminant analysis were used
as method.

Main results: According to the clustering analysis results, it was determined that
regional directorates of forestry could be divided into maximum 6 and minimum 2
groups. As a result of the discriminant analysis conducted to determine the
highest success of the groupings, it was determined that the regional
directorates of forestry distinguished in 100% success in 6 groups. Also, it
was found that a Kastamonu regional directorate of forestry, which has the
highest value in industrial wood production, has formed a group alone.

Highlights: For the production of industrial wood, the regional directorates of
forestry can put more emphasis on the use of forest areas. Thus, we can avoid
the dependence on foreign sources.

Keywords

Industrial Wood, Cluster Analysis, Discriminant Analysis

References

• Akyüz, K.C. (2006). Competition of forest products industry during to European Union membership. ZKÜ Bartın Journal of Forest Faculty, 8(9), 83-94.
• Akyüz, K.C., Balaban, Y. & Yıldırım, İ. (2012). Evaluation of financial structure of forest products industry by means of balance sheet ratios. International Journal of Economic and Administrative Studies, 58(9), 133-144.
• Akyüz, K.C., Cındık, H., Akyüz, İ. & Serin, H. (2002a). Role of forest product industry development on Eastern Black Sea region. Kafkas University Journal of Artvin Forestry Faculty, 1, 24-32.
• Akyüz, K.C., Cındık, H., Serin, H. & Akyüz, İ. (2002b). Investigation of exports and imports total prices of forest product industry in the East Black Sea region. Kafkas University Journal of Artvin Forestry Faculty, 1, 10-16.
• Akyüz, K.C. & Yıldırım, İ. (2009). Paper and paper board industry in Turkey and European Union countries. Kastamonu Univ., Journal of Forestry Faculty, 9(2), 86-94.
• Akyüz, K.C., Yıldırım, İ., Tugay, T., Akyüz, İ. & Gedik, T. (2016). A cluster and discriminant analysis of sub-sectors of manufacturing based on the occupational accident statistics. Journal of Forestry, 12(1), 18-29.
• Alem, S. (2016). Status and trends of the processed wood products trade in Ethiopia. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 35(4), 251-260.
• Anonymous, (2015). The presence of forests in Turkey. Rebublic of Turkey General Directorate of Forestry, Ankara. (https://www.ogm.gov.tr/ekutuphane/Yayinlar/T%C3%BCrkiye%20Orman%20Varl%C4%B1%C4%9F%C4%B1-2016-2017.pdf)
• Anonymous, (2016). Production and marketing of wood-based forest products. General Directorate of Forestry, Department of Management and Marketing, Ankara.
• Bojnec, S. & Fertö, I. (2011). Trade in raw and semi-finished wood products of Hungary and Slovenia with Austria. Austrian Journal of Forest Science, 3, 157-176
• Bojnec, S. & Fertö, I. (2014). Forestry industry trade by degree of wood processing in the enlarged European Union countries. Forest Policy and Economics, 40, 31-39.
• Çakmak, Z. (1999). Evaluation of clustering results and the validity problem in clustering analysis. Dumlupınar Uni., Journal of Social Siences, 3, 187-205.
• Filiz, Z. & Yaprak, B. (2009). A study on classifying parenting styles through discriminant analysis. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 5(2), 195-209.
• GDF (2015). Turkey Forest Assets 2015. General Directorate of Forestry, Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs, Ankara.
• GDF (2017). Production, sales and stock activities. Republic of Turkey General Directorate of Forestry, Ankara. (https://www.ogm.gov.tr/ekutuphane/Uretim Satis ve Stok Faaliyetleri/Forms/All Items.aspx)
• Giray, S. (2013). Classification of countries according to their tourism statistics via different cluster analysis methods and the place of Turkey in this structure. International Conference on Eurasian Economies, 17-18 September, Rusia, 695-704.
• Güngör, İ., Kayacan, M.C. & Korkmaz, M. (2004). Artificial neural networks use in the forecasting of industrial wood demand and comparison with different estimation methods. Operations Research and Industrial Engineering XXIV. National Congress, Çukurova University, 15-18 June, Adana, Turkey.
• Güzeller, C. & Kelecioğlu, H. (2006). The study on classification validity of secondary education student selection & placement exam. H.U. Journal of Education, 30, 140-148.
• KetchenJr, D.J. & Shook, C.L. (1996). The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: an analysis and critique. Strategic Management Journal, 17(6), 441-458.
• Koebel, B.M., Levet, A.L., Van, P.N., Purohoo, I. & Guinard, L. (2016). Productivity, resource endowment, and trade performance of the wood product sector. Journal of Forest Economics, 22(C), 24-35.
• Maxir, H.D.S. & Masullo, L.S. (2017). The Brazilian insertion into the International trade of forest products chain. Revista Árvore, 41(3), 1-12.
• Oğuzlar, A. (2006). Assessment of house hold type and rural-urban area distinctions by means of discriminant analysis. Journal of Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F, 11, 70-84.
• Palus, H., Parobek, J. & Liker, B. (2015). Trade performance and competitiveness of the Slovak wood processing industry within the visegrad group countries. Drvna Industrija, 66(3), 195-203.
• Sujova, A., Hlavackova, P. & Marcinekova, K. (2015). Measuring the impact of foreign trade on performance growth of the wood processing industry. Wood Research, 60(3), 491–502.
• Tekin, B. (2015). Grouping of cities in terms of primary health indicators in Turkey: an application of cluster analysis. Çankırı Karatekin University Journal of The Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 1-28.
• Tiryaki, S., Aydın, A. & Üçüncü, K. (2015). Investigating foreign trade situation of Turkish furniture sector in process of European Union by cluster analysis. Selçuk Journal of Technical, Special Issue-1, 938-949.
• URL-1 (2017). Our forests and benefits. https://www.ogm.gov.tr/ekutuphane/Yayinlar/Orman%C4%B1n%20Faydalar%C4%B1.pdf, Access date:20.08.2017.
• URL-2 (2017). https://www.ogm.gov.tr/ekutuphane/Sayfalar/Istatistikler.aspx,Accesdate: 20.08.2017.
• Yıldırım, İ., Akyüz, K.C., Gedik, T., Balaban, Y. & Çabuk, Y. (2008). Competitive power of Turkey with European Union countries in wood-based panel industry. Bartın Journal of Forest Faculty, 10(13), 11-22.
• Yılmaz, Ş.K. & Patır, S. (2011). Cluster analysis and its usage in marketing. Journal of Academic Approaches, 2(1), 91-113.