BibTex RIS Cite

TÜRK AİLELERİNDE YABANCI UYRUKLU GELİNLER: BÜKREŞ ÖRNEĞİ

Year 2019, Issue: 19, 60 - 72, 01.04.2019

Abstract

Tüm toplumlar, aileyi geçmişten günümüze kadar toplumun temel direği olarak kabul etmişlerdir. Birey açısından ilk çevre ve doğal özellikler taşıyan bir ortam olması dolayısıyla oldukça önemli kabul edilmiştir. Küreselleşme ile birlikte, dünyanın çok farklı kültürleri arasında gerçekleşen evliliklerin sayısında da artışlar olmuştur. Ulaşım ve haberleşme imkanlarının çoğalmasıyla, ülkeler arası göçlerle farklı kültür ve dinlerden kadın ve erkeklerin evlenmeleri giderek artmaktadır. Nitel bir araştırma olarak tasarlanan bu çalışmada “durum çalışması” deseni dikkate alınmıştır. Bükreş’te yaşayan Romen kadınlarla evli 8 erkek katılımcının, aile hayatı ve evlilikle ilgili görüşlerinin incelenerek, ailelerinin sosyolojik portresini çizmek amaçlanmıştır. Maksatlı örnekleme yolu ile belirlenen çalışma grubuna veri toplama aracı olarak araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen yapılandırılmış görüşme formu uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler içerik analizi ile yorumlanmış ve NVivo 10 kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın amacı doğrultusunda katılımcıların, göç ettikleri ülke ile ilgili yorumları, uyum ve kültürel farklılıklara ilişkin algıları, aile ve evlilikleri ile ilgili düşünceleri ve farklı bir kültürde evlilik konusundaki algıları yorumlanmıştır.

References

  • Aksoy, Z. (2012). Uluslararası göç ve kültürlerarası iletişim. Journal of International Social Re- search. Winter2012, Vol. 5 Issue 20, p292-303. 12p.
  • Al-Yousuf, H. (2006). Negotiating faith and identity in Muslim–Christian marriages in Britain. Islam and Christian&Muslim Relations, 17:3, 317-329, DOI:10.1080/09596410600794996.
  • Aniciete, D., Soloski, K. (2011). The social construction of marriage and a narrative approach to treatment of intra-relationship diversity. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 23:2, 103- 126, DOI: 10.1080/08952833.2011.576233.
  • Balcıoğlu, İ. (2007). Sosyal ve Psikolojik Açıdan Göç, İstanbul: Elit Kültür Yayınları.
  • Bangstad, S. (2004.) When Muslims marry non-Muslims: Marriage as incorporation in a cape Muslim community. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 15:3, 349-364. DOI: 10.1080/0959641042000233273.
  • Daneshpour, M. (2003). Lives together, worlds apart?. Journal of Couple & Relationship Thera- py, 2:2-3, 57-71, DOI: 10.1300/J398v02n02_05.
  • Ferrari, G., Macmillan, R. (2019). Until work do us part: Labour migration and occupational stratification in
  • non-cohabiting marriage. Population Studies
  • DOI:10.1080/00324728.2019.1583359.
  • Gopalkrishnan, N., Babacan, H. (2007). Ties that bind: marriage and partner choice in the Indian community in Australia in a transnational context. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 14:4, 507-526, DOI: 10.1080/10702890701578498.
  • Güvenç, B. (1996). İnsan ve kültür. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
  • Holton, R. (2000). Globalization’s cultural consequences. The ANNALS of the American Acad- emy of Political and Social
  • Science, 570(1), 140–
  • https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620057000111
  • Kalkan,M.,Hamamcı,Z.,Yalçın,İ. (2015). Evlilik Öncesi Psikolojik Danışma, Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Kaya, M. (2008). Dünden Bugüne Çok Eşlilik, İstanbul: Çıra Yayıncılık.
  • Marks, L. (2005). How does religion influence marriage? Christian, Jewish, Mormon, and Mus- lim perspectives. Marriage & Family Review. 38:1, 85-111, DOI: 10.1300/J002v38n01_07.
  • Özer, İ. (2004).Kentleşme, Kentlileşme ve Kentsel Değişme, Bursa: Ekin Kitabevi.
  • Özgür, E.M., Aydin, O. (2012.) Spatial patterns of marriage migration in Turkey. Marriage & Family Review, 48:5, 418-442, DOI: 10.1080/01494929.2012.676468.
  • Özgüven, İ.E. (2017). Evlilik ve Aile Terapisi, Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Ter Wal , J., De Munnik, S., Andriessen, I., (2008). Turkish marriage migration to the Nether- lands: policy vs. migrants' perspectives. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 6:3, 409-422, DOI: 10.1080/15362940802371804.
  • Timmerman, C. (2006). Gender dynamics in the context of Turkish marriage migration: the case of Belgium. Turkish Studies, 7:1, 125-143, DOI: 10.1080/14683840500520642.
  • Timmerman, C., Lodewyckx, I., Wets, J. (2009). Marriage at the intersection between tradition and
  • globalization. The History of the Family. 14:2, 232-244, DOI
  • 1016/j.hisfam.2009.04.002.
  • TUİK, (2018) .Evlenme ve Boşanma İstatistikleri, 2017.
  • Yahya, S., Boag, S. (2014). Till faith do us part …: relation between religious affiliation and atti- tudes toward cross-cultural and interfaith dating and marriage. Marriage & Family Re- view, 50:6, 480-504, DOI: 10.1080/01494929.2014.909376.
  • Yalçın, C. (2004). Göç Sosyolojisi, Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Yılmaz, A. (2014). Uluslararası göç; çeşitleri, nedenleri ve etkileri. Turkish Studies International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 9/2 Winter 2014

FOREIGN BRIDES IN TURKISH FAMILY: THE CASE OF BUCHAREST

Year 2019, Issue: 19, 60 - 72, 01.04.2019

Abstract

From past to present all societies adopted very important the concept of family by means of the foundation of society and the natural habitat and the first environment of individuals.Old or new in whole society the source of family is based on a woman and man that join their lives with the bond of marriage. In a globalizing world, marriage is not only affected by the diversity of the country. the marriage takes place between different cultures in the world. The marriage of men and women from different cultures and religions is increasing by means of The proliferation of transportation and communication facilities and transnational migration. In this study, with examining eight male participants' views on family life and marriage who living in Bucharest and married Romanian women, intended to draw a sociological portrait of their families. The general demographic characteristics and views about marriage and family life of Turkish man were tried to be determined. Case study design which is one of the qualitative research methods was used. The purposive sampling technique was used in this study. As data collection tool, structured interview form was applied to working group. In analysis of study on the categorization process, computer-aided qualitative data analysis software NVivo 10 was used. For the purpose of the research, ideas about the most important factor in choosing spouses of participants, thoughts about importance of marriage, the most important problems they live with their spouses, acceptance of foreign brides in family, foreign brides' desires for learning Turkish culture were identified. The obtained data was interpreted by content analysis.

References

  • Aksoy, Z. (2012). Uluslararası göç ve kültürlerarası iletişim. Journal of International Social Re- search. Winter2012, Vol. 5 Issue 20, p292-303. 12p.
  • Al-Yousuf, H. (2006). Negotiating faith and identity in Muslim–Christian marriages in Britain. Islam and Christian&Muslim Relations, 17:3, 317-329, DOI:10.1080/09596410600794996.
  • Aniciete, D., Soloski, K. (2011). The social construction of marriage and a narrative approach to treatment of intra-relationship diversity. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 23:2, 103- 126, DOI: 10.1080/08952833.2011.576233.
  • Balcıoğlu, İ. (2007). Sosyal ve Psikolojik Açıdan Göç, İstanbul: Elit Kültür Yayınları.
  • Bangstad, S. (2004.) When Muslims marry non-Muslims: Marriage as incorporation in a cape Muslim community. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 15:3, 349-364. DOI: 10.1080/0959641042000233273.
  • Daneshpour, M. (2003). Lives together, worlds apart?. Journal of Couple & Relationship Thera- py, 2:2-3, 57-71, DOI: 10.1300/J398v02n02_05.
  • Ferrari, G., Macmillan, R. (2019). Until work do us part: Labour migration and occupational stratification in
  • non-cohabiting marriage. Population Studies
  • DOI:10.1080/00324728.2019.1583359.
  • Gopalkrishnan, N., Babacan, H. (2007). Ties that bind: marriage and partner choice in the Indian community in Australia in a transnational context. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 14:4, 507-526, DOI: 10.1080/10702890701578498.
  • Güvenç, B. (1996). İnsan ve kültür. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
  • Holton, R. (2000). Globalization’s cultural consequences. The ANNALS of the American Acad- emy of Political and Social
  • Science, 570(1), 140–
  • https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620057000111
  • Kalkan,M.,Hamamcı,Z.,Yalçın,İ. (2015). Evlilik Öncesi Psikolojik Danışma, Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Kaya, M. (2008). Dünden Bugüne Çok Eşlilik, İstanbul: Çıra Yayıncılık.
  • Marks, L. (2005). How does religion influence marriage? Christian, Jewish, Mormon, and Mus- lim perspectives. Marriage & Family Review. 38:1, 85-111, DOI: 10.1300/J002v38n01_07.
  • Özer, İ. (2004).Kentleşme, Kentlileşme ve Kentsel Değişme, Bursa: Ekin Kitabevi.
  • Özgür, E.M., Aydin, O. (2012.) Spatial patterns of marriage migration in Turkey. Marriage & Family Review, 48:5, 418-442, DOI: 10.1080/01494929.2012.676468.
  • Özgüven, İ.E. (2017). Evlilik ve Aile Terapisi, Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Ter Wal , J., De Munnik, S., Andriessen, I., (2008). Turkish marriage migration to the Nether- lands: policy vs. migrants' perspectives. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 6:3, 409-422, DOI: 10.1080/15362940802371804.
  • Timmerman, C. (2006). Gender dynamics in the context of Turkish marriage migration: the case of Belgium. Turkish Studies, 7:1, 125-143, DOI: 10.1080/14683840500520642.
  • Timmerman, C., Lodewyckx, I., Wets, J. (2009). Marriage at the intersection between tradition and
  • globalization. The History of the Family. 14:2, 232-244, DOI
  • 1016/j.hisfam.2009.04.002.
  • TUİK, (2018) .Evlenme ve Boşanma İstatistikleri, 2017.
  • Yahya, S., Boag, S. (2014). Till faith do us part …: relation between religious affiliation and atti- tudes toward cross-cultural and interfaith dating and marriage. Marriage & Family Re- view, 50:6, 480-504, DOI: 10.1080/01494929.2014.909376.
  • Yalçın, C. (2004). Göç Sosyolojisi, Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Yılmaz, A. (2014). Uluslararası göç; çeşitleri, nedenleri ve etkileri. Turkish Studies International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 9/2 Winter 2014
There are 29 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Yelda Sevim This is me

Publication Date April 1, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Issue: 19

Cite

APA Sevim, Y. (2019). TÜRK AİLELERİNDE YABANCI UYRUKLU GELİNLER: BÜKREŞ ÖRNEĞİ. Kesit Akademi Dergisi(19), 60-72.