Research Article

Comparison of the Performance of Five Different Scoring Systems in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Volume: 26 Number: 1 March 21, 2023
  • Flora Özkalaycı Kaçar *
  • Mehmet Saygı
  • Tanıl Özer
  • Ali Karagöz
  • İbrahim Halil Tanboğa
  • Vecih Oduncu

Comparison of the Performance of Five Different Scoring Systems in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Abstract

Introduction: Although most of the scoring systems are used for long-term mortality assessment in STelevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), there is still lack of data comparing model performances. In this study, it was aimed to compare five scoring systems for predicting long-term mortality in patients presented with STEMI. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective observational study consisting of 1689 consecutive STEMI patients who underwent PCI between 2009 and 2013. Patient data was obtained from the electronic data base of the hospital. Each patients’ mortality risk was assessed with five different risk scores and recorded. Results: A total of 1689 patients with STEMI were included into the study. Median follow-up time was one year. Risk scores were calculated for each patient. Although similar statistical significance was presented among all scores, modified age, creatinine clearance, and ejection fraction score (mACEF) were demonstrated to be more significant than relevant scoring systems in clinical respect. Conclusion: Among five scores, the mACEF score was demonstrated to be the most significant model in clinical respect for the prediction of mortality.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Schiele F, Hochadel M, Tubaro M, Meneveau N, Wojakowski W, Gierlotka M, et al. Reperfusion strategy in Europe: Temporal trends in performance measures for reperfusion therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2010;31(21):2614-24.
  2. 2. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2018;39(2):79-82.
  3. 3. Morrow DA, Antman EM, Charlesworth A, Cairns R, Murphy SA, Lemos JA de, et al. TIMI risk score for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A convenient, bedside, clinical score for risk assessment at presentation an intravenous nPA for treatment of infarcting myocardium early II trial substudy. Circulation 2000;102:2031-7.
  4. 4. Kozieradzka A, Kamiński KA, Maciorkowska D, Olszewska M, Dobrzycki S, Nowak K, et al. GRACE, TIMI, Zwolle and CADILLAC risk scores-do they predict 5-year outcomes after ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated invasively? Int J Cardiol 2011;148:70-5.
  5. 5. Morrow DA, Antman EM, Parsons L, de Lemos JA, Cannon CP, Giugliano RP, et al. Application of the TIMI risk score for ST-elevation MI in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 3. JAMA 2001;286:1356-9.
  6. 6. Addala S, Grines CL, Dixon SR, Stone GW, Boura JA, Ochoa AB, et al. Predicting mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PAMI risk score). Am J Cardiol 2004;93:629-32.
  7. 7. Halkin A, Singh M, Nikolsky E, Grines CL, Tcheng JE, Garcia E, et al. Prediction of mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. The CADILLAC risk score. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1397-405.
  8. 8. Morrow DA, Antman EM, Giugliano RP, Cairns R, Charlesworth A, Murphy SA, et al. A simple risk index for rapid initial triage of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: An InTIME II sub-study. Lancet 2001;358(9293):1571-5.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Clinical Sciences

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Flora Özkalaycı Kaçar * This is me
0000-0003-2816-0199
Türkiye

Mehmet Saygı This is me
0000-0002-7258-2797
Türkiye

İbrahim Halil Tanboğa This is me
0000-0003-4546-9227
Türkiye

Publication Date

March 21, 2023

Submission Date

September 23, 2022

Acceptance Date

December 15, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 26 Number: 1

APA
Özkalaycı Kaçar, F., Saygı, M., Özer, T., Karagöz, A., Tanboğa, İ. H., & Oduncu, V. (2023). Comparison of the Performance of Five Different Scoring Systems in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Koşuyolu Heart Journal, 26(1), 20-26. https://izlik.org/JA43MY36AF
AMA
1.Özkalaycı Kaçar F, Saygı M, Özer T, Karagöz A, Tanboğa İH, Oduncu V. Comparison of the Performance of Five Different Scoring Systems in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Koşuyolu Heart Journal. 2023;26(1):20-26. https://izlik.org/JA43MY36AF
Chicago
Özkalaycı Kaçar, Flora, Mehmet Saygı, Tanıl Özer, Ali Karagöz, İbrahim Halil Tanboğa, and Vecih Oduncu. 2023. “Comparison of the Performance of Five Different Scoring Systems in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction”. Koşuyolu Heart Journal 26 (1): 20-26. https://izlik.org/JA43MY36AF.
EndNote
Özkalaycı Kaçar F, Saygı M, Özer T, Karagöz A, Tanboğa İH, Oduncu V (March 1, 2023) Comparison of the Performance of Five Different Scoring Systems in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Koşuyolu Heart Journal 26 1 20–26.
IEEE
[1]F. Özkalaycı Kaçar, M. Saygı, T. Özer, A. Karagöz, İ. H. Tanboğa, and V. Oduncu, “Comparison of the Performance of Five Different Scoring Systems in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction”, Koşuyolu Heart Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 20–26, Mar. 2023, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA43MY36AF
ISNAD
Özkalaycı Kaçar, Flora - Saygı, Mehmet - Özer, Tanıl - Karagöz, Ali - Tanboğa, İbrahim Halil - Oduncu, Vecih. “Comparison of the Performance of Five Different Scoring Systems in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction”. Koşuyolu Heart Journal 26/1 (March 1, 2023): 20-26. https://izlik.org/JA43MY36AF.
JAMA
1.Özkalaycı Kaçar F, Saygı M, Özer T, Karagöz A, Tanboğa İH, Oduncu V. Comparison of the Performance of Five Different Scoring Systems in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Koşuyolu Heart Journal. 2023;26:20–26.
MLA
Özkalaycı Kaçar, Flora, et al. “Comparison of the Performance of Five Different Scoring Systems in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction”. Koşuyolu Heart Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, Mar. 2023, pp. 20-26, https://izlik.org/JA43MY36AF.
Vancouver
1.Flora Özkalaycı Kaçar, Mehmet Saygı, Tanıl Özer, Ali Karagöz, İbrahim Halil Tanboğa, Vecih Oduncu. Comparison of the Performance of Five Different Scoring Systems in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Koşuyolu Heart Journal [Internet]. 2023 Mar. 1;26(1):20-6. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA43MY36AF