Evaluation of Saphenous Vein with or Without Valve and Radial Artery Patency Via Tomography in Patients Who Underwent Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Year 2018, Volume: 21 Issue: 1, 1 - 8, 01.04.2018

Mehmet Özülkü Fatih Aygün Bilal Egemen Çiftçi

Abstract

Introduction:
This
prospective study investigated the effect of the valves of saphenous veins,
which were used as conduits, on patency and the 2-year rate of remaining
patency of saphenous vein with valve, saphenous vein without valve, and radial
art ery (RA) via multislice computerized tomography (MSCT) angiography.

Patients
and Methods: Between 2014 and 2015, the patients that underwent
coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and
cross-clamp (on-pump with cross-clamp) in our clinic were grouped into three
groups depending on the graft type. The first group (Group 1) was RA group, the
second group (Group 2) was great saphenous vein with valve group, and the third
group (Group 3) was great saphenous vein without valve group. 

Results: The 2-year
rates of the remaining patency of these grafts in the decreasing order was as
following: RA (87.5%), great saphenous vein without valve (82.4%), and great
saphenous vein with valve (78.8%).

Conclusion: The rate of remaining
patency was not statistically significant among the RA, saphenous vein without
valve, and saphenous vein with valve conduits (p> 0.05; RA vs. vein without
valve, p= 0.737; RA vs. saphenous vein with valve, p= 0.321; and saphenous vein
without valve vs. saphenous vein with valve, p= 0.465).

Keywords

CABG, saphenous vein, radial artery, computerized tomography

Koroner Arter Baypas Operasyonu Olan Olgularda Kapaklı Kapaksız Safen Ven ve Radiyal Arter Açıklığının Tomografi ile Araştırılması

Abstract

Giriş: Çalışmamız prospektif bir çalışma olup yalnızca konduit olarak kullanılmış
safen venlerin kapakçıklarının açık kalma üzerine etkisi değil, aynı zamanda
kapaklı safen venin, kapaksız safen venin, radyal arterin iki yıllık açık kalma
oranı çok kesitli bilgisayarlı tomografi (ÇKBT) anjiyografi kullanılarak
araştırılmıştır.

Hastalar ve
Yöntem: Kliniğimizde 2014-2015 yılları arasında koroner arter
baypas greft operasyonu (KABGO) yapılmış hastalar üç farklı grefte göre
gruplandı. Gruplar kalp akciğer makinası ve X-klemp (On-Pump X-klempli)
kullanılarak KABGO yapılan hastalarda kullanılan greftlere göre oluşturuldu.
Birinci grup (Grup 1); radiyal arter grubu, ikinci grup (Grup 2); valvli safen
ven grubu, üçüncü grup (Grup 3); valv içermeyen safen ven grubu olarak
belirlendi.

Bulgular: Greftlerde iki yıllık açık kalma oranı, radiyal arter için %87.5,  kapaksız safen ven  için %82.4 ve kapaklı safen ven için
%78.8  bulunmuştur.

Sonuç: Radiyal arter, kapaksız
safen ven, kapaklı safen ven arasında iki yıllık açık kalma oranları,
istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildir (p> 0.05; radiyal arter vs. valvsiz
ven için p= 0.737; radiyal arter vs. valvli ven için p= 0.321; valvsiz ven vs.
vavli ven için p= 0.465).

Keywords

KABGO, safen ven, radiyal arter, bilgisayarlı tomografi

References

• 1. Goldman S, Zadina K, Moritz T, Ovitt T, Sethi G, Copeland J, et al. Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:2149-56.
• 2. Reiner Z, Catapano AL, Backer GD, Graham I, Taskinen MR, Wiklund O, et al. The Task for the management of dyslipidaemias of th European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Eur Heart J 2011;32:1769-818.
• 3. Lim MJ, White CJ. Coronary angiography is the gold standard for patients with significant left ventricular dysfunction. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2013;55:504-8.
• 4. Chiurlia E, Menozzi M, Ratti C, Romagnoli R, Modena MG. Follow-up of coronary artery bypass graft patency by multislice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:1094-7.
• 5. Athanasiou T, Saso S, Rao C, Vecht J, Grapsa J, Dunning J, et al. Radial artery versus saphenous vein conduits fo r coronary artery bypass surgery:forty years of competition-which conduit offers betterpatency? A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 2011;40:208-20.
• 6. Breyer RH, Spray TL, Kastl DG, Roberts WC. Histological changes in saphenous vein aorta coronary bypass grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1976;72:916-24.
• 7. Lawrie GM, Morris GC Jr, Chapman DW. Patterns of patency of 596 vein grafts up to seven years after aorta-coronary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surgery 1977;73:443-8.
• 8. Beebe HG, Clark WF, DeWeese JA. Atherosclerotic change occurring in an autogenous venous arterial graft. Arch Surg 1970;101:85-8.
• 9. Khot UN, Friedman DT, Petterson G, Smedira NG, Li J, Ellis SG. Radial artery bypass grafts have an increased occurrence of angiographically severe stenosis and occlusion compared with left internal mammary arteries and saphenous vein grafts. Circulation 2004;109:2086-91.
• 10. Whitney DG, Kahn EM, Estes JW. Valvular occlusion of the arterialized saphenous vein. Ann Surg 1976;42:879-87.
• 11. Chaux A, Ruan XM, Fishbein MC, Sandhu M, Matloff JM. Influence of vein valves in the development of arteriosclerosis in venoarterial grafts in the rabbit. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:1389-90.
• 12. Lajos TZ, Robicsek F Thubrikar M, Urschel H. Improving patency of coronary conduits “valveless” veins and/or arterial grafts. J Card Surg 2007;22:170-7.
• 13. Cohen G, Tamariz MG Sever JY, Liaghati N, Guru V, Christakis GT, et al. The radial artery versus the saphenous vein graft in contemporary CABG: a case-matched study. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:180-5.
• 14. Desai ND, Cohen EA, Naylor CD, Fremes SE. A randomized comparison of radial-artery and saphenous-vein coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2302-9.
• 15. Modine T, Al-Ruzzeh S, Mazrani W, Azeem F, Bustami M, Ilsley C. Use of radial artery graft reduces the morbidity of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients aged 65 years and older. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:1144-7.
• 16. Engoren M, Habib RH, Schwann TA. Late effects of radial artery versus saphenous vein grafting in patients aged 70 years or older. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;94:1478-84.
• 17. Georghiou GP, Vidne BA, Dunning J. Does the radial artery provide better long-term patency than the saphenous vein? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2005;4:304-10.
• 18. Goldman S. Gulshan KS, William H, Thai, H, McFalls E, Herbert B, et al. Radial Artery Grafts vs Saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA 2011;305:167-74.
• 19. Acar C, Ramsheyi A, Pagny JY, Jebara V, Barrier P, Fabiani JN, et al. The radial artery forcoronary artery bypass grafting: clinical and angiographicresults at five years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:981-9.
• 20. Yie K, Na CY, Oh SS, Kim JH, Shinn SH, Seo HJ, et al. Angiographic results of the radial artery graft patency according to the degree of native coronary stenosis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;33:341-8.