Research Article

POWER OF PROOF OF THE CONSIGNMENT NOTE

Volume: 4 Number: 1 April 30, 2024
EN TR

POWER OF PROOF OF THE CONSIGNMENT NOTE

Abstract

Although the contract of carriage is not subject to any form in the Turkish Commercial Code, there are detailed regulations regarding the consignment note, which is the evidence of the contract. This study focuses on the proof power of the consignment note. The proof power of the consignment note plays an important role in resolving disputes arising during transportation transactions. The consignment note is an important evidence that records many stages from the moment the goods are received to the moment the goods are delivered. The information on the consignment note includes the details of the transportation process such as the type, quantity, carrier, sender and consignee of the goods. This information makes the consignment note a means of proof. Article 858 of the Turkish Commercial Code, which contains regulations on the power of proof of the consignment note, strengthens the power of proof of the document by stipulating various presumptions regarding the consignment note signed jointly by the consignor and the carrier. In our study, we have endeavored to discuss these presumptions in detail.

Keywords

Carrier , Sender , Contract of Carriage , Consignment Note , Power of Proof.

References

  1. Adıgüzel, Burak. Taşıma Hukuku. Ankara: Adalet Yayınevi, 2018.
  2. Al Kılıç, Şengül. “HMK'da 7251 Sayılı Kanun İle Yapılan Değişikliğin Ticari Defterlerin İspat Kuvvetine Etkile-ri”, Ticaret Hukuku Sempozyumu 2021. Ankara: Yetkin Yayınları, 2021.
  3. Can, Mertol. CMR ve Alman Ticaret Kanunu Hükümleri ile Mukayeseli Olarak Türk Taşıma Hukukunun Genel Esasları. C. I, Ankara: İmaj Yayıncılık, 2017.
  4. Can, Mertol. “4925 sayılı Karayolu Taşıma Kanunu’na göre Yapılan Taşımaların Tabi Olduğu Hukuki Esaslar”, Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 9 (1), 2005, s. 11-63.
  5. Göksu, Mustafa. “6100 sayılı Hukuk Muhakemeleri Çerçevesinde Senetle İspat Kuralları ve Bunların İstisnala-rı”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 1/1, (2011): s. 53-65.
  6. Görgün, Şanal, Levent Börü ve Mehmet Kodakoğlu. Medenî Usul Hukuku, 11. Bası. Ankara: Yetkin Yayınları, 2022.
  7. Karakaş, Fatma Tülay. “Karine Kavramı, Kanuni Karineler ve Varsayımlar”, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 62/3, (2013): s. 729-759.
  8. Kirchhof, Günter. BeckOK HGB (Hrsg Häublein, Martin/Hoffmann-Theinert, Roland), 40. Edition. München: C.H. Beck, 2023.
  9. Kendigelen Abuzer ve Aydın Alihan. “Karayolu ile Uluslararası Eşya Taşıma Sözleşmesine İlişkin Antlaşma (CMR), Resmi Çeviriye İlişkin Sorunlar ve Bir Serbest Çeviri Denemesi”, Prof. Dr. Ömer Teoman’a 55. Yaş Günü Armağanı, C. 1, İstanbul: Beta, 2002
  10. Koller, Ingo. Handelsgesetzbuch Kommentar (Hrsg Ingo Koller/Peter Kindler/Klaus-Dieter Drüen), 10. Aufla-ge, C.H. Beck, 2023.
Chicago
Orbay Ortaç, Nurdan. 2024. “TAŞIMA SENEDİNİN İSPAT GÜCÜ”. Kırıkkale Hukuk Mecmuası 4 (1): 71-90. https://doi.org/10.59909/khm.1380152.