INVESTIGATING THE IMPACT OF COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN AND MATERIAL ON KINETIC BEHAVIORS

Abstract

With the advancement of technology, flexibility and adaptability have become increasingly prominent concepts in architectural design, leading to a growing demand for transformable and reconfigurable spaces. This shift has resulted in the adoption of kinetic structures, which function dynamically and responsively by incorporating data from the environment into elements such as façades or other building components. These structures possess the capability to change shape in response to factors such as climatic conditions, user needs, and energy efficiency requirements. In particular, the development of smart materials has facilitated the wider and more effective implementation of kinetic systems. Moreover, advancements in computer-aided design tools have enhanced the flexibility of production and generation processes in kinetic architecture, enabling more innovative and complex solutions through methods such as parametric design, generative design, and performance-based design. This study investigates kinetic architectural design approaches that integrate material properties with computational design methods. The primary aim is to analyze such design approaches and present a systematic decision-making framework that can serve as a reference for designers. The examined examples are evaluated under three main categories: kinetic structures, material usage, and computational design methods, along with their associated sub-criteria. The findings indicate that kinetic architectural applications predominantly employ parametric design, simulation, and optimization methods, while considering the technical and constructional properties of materials throughout the process. Future research may benefit from offering designers a more integrated approach, incorporating alternative methods and kinetic features into the design process.

Keywords

• Computational design
• Smart Material
• Kinetic Architecture

HESAPLAMALI TASARIM İLE MALZEMENİN KİNETİK DAVRANIŞLAR ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Abstract

Günümüzde teknolojinin gelişmesiyle birlikte mimari tasarımda esneklik ve uyarlanabilirlik ön plana çıkmış, değiştirilebilir ve dönüştürülebilir mekânlara olan ihtiyaç artmıştır. Bu ihtiyaç, çevresel verilere duyarlı olarak işlev kazanan kinetik yapıların benimsenmesine yol açmıştır. İklim koşulları, kullanıcı ihtiyaçları ve enerji verimliliği gibi faktörlere göre şekil değiştirebilen bu yapılar, özellikle akıllı malzeme gelişmeleriyle daha yaygın hâle gelmiştir. Bilgisayar destekli tasarım araçlarının gelişmesi ise kinetik mimaride üretim ve türetim süreçlerini esnekleştirerek, parametrik, üretken ve performans odaklı yöntemlerle daha yenilikçi çözümler geliştirilmesini mümkün kılmıştır. Bu çalışmada, malzemenin teknik özellikleri ile hesaplamalı tasarım yöntemlerinin birlikte ele alındığı kinetik mimari tasarım yaklaşımları incelenmektedir. Araştırmanın temel amacı, bu bağlamda geliştirilen tasarımların analiz edilerek tasarımcılar için referans niteliğinde sistematik bir karar alma sürecini ortaya koymaktır. Çalışma kapsamında araştırılan örnekler kinetik yapı, malzeme kullanımı ve hesaplamalı tasarım yöntemlerini içeren üç ana başlık ve buna bağlı olarak belirlenen alt kriterler ile değerlendirilmiştir. Yapılan değerlendirme sonucunda kinetik mimari yapılarda parametrik tasarım, simülasyon ve optimizasyon gibi yöntemlerin ağırlıklı olarak kullandığı, malzemenin teknik ve yapım özelliklerinin süreç boyunca ele alındığı görülmüştür. Gelecek çalışmalarda kullanılacak yöntem ve malzeme açısından tasarımcılara bütünleşik bir yaklaşım sunularak, başka yöntem ve kinetik özelliklerde sürece dahil edilebilir.

Keywords

• Hesaplamalı Tasarım
• Akıllı Malzeme
• Kinetik Mimari

References

1. Abdallah, M. R., Abdelazem, A. G., & Essa, H. Y., (2020). Application of kinetic systems technology in design, Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 67(1), 139–158.
2. Addington, D. M., & Schodek, D. L., (2005). Smart materials and new technologies: For the architecture and design professions. Architectural Press, Corporate Drive, Burlington.
3. Afzali, N., & Hamzehloo, S., (2018). Kinetic, an innovative approach in contemporary architecture. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Modern Research in Civil Engineering, Architectural & Urban Development (pp. 39–52). Munich, Germany.
4. Alkhayyat, J. M. J., (2013). Design Strategy for Adaptive Kinetic Patterns: Creating a Generative Design for Dynamic Solar Shading Systems, University of Salford, UK.
5. Arpacıoğlu, Ü., & Kuruç, A., (2010). Zamansız malzemelerin zamanda yolculuğu. Mimarlıkta Malzeme, 5(15), TMMOB Mimarlar Odası İstanbul Büyükkent Şubesi, İstanbul, 47-51.
6. Baba Marbles Showroom, Erişim adresi: https://archello.com/nl/project/baba-marbles, Erişim tarihi: 08.02.2025.
7. Belek, A. N., & Yamaçlı, R., (2023). Kinetik cephe sistemlerinin performansa dayalı tasarımı ve tasarım süreci. Sürdürülebilir Mühendislik Uygulamaları ve Teknolojik Gelişmeler Dergisi, 6(2), 180–201.
8. Bentley, P. (1999). An introduction to evolutionary design by computers. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

9. Caetano, I., Santos, L., & Leitão, A., (2020). Computational design in architecture: Defining parametric, generative, and algorithmic design. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 9(2), 287–300.
10. Çağdaş, G., Bacınoğlu, Z., & Çavuşoğlu, Ö., (2015). Mimarlıkta Hesaplamalı Yaklaşımlar, Mimarlık Dosya 35, TMMOB Mimarlar Odası Ankara Şubesi Dergisi, 33-42.
11. Delana., (2015). “Another Wave in the Wall: Vertical Lake Building Facade,” web urbanist.com, Erişim adresi: https://weburbanist.com/2010/07/23/another-wave-in-the-wall-vertical-lake-building-facade/
12. Dom., (2025). The Shed, Erişim adresi: https://arquitecturaviva.com/obras/centro-cultural-the-shed-nueva-york, Erişim tarihi: 10.06.2025.
13. Dragspel-huset Evi, Erişim adresi: https://architizer.com/projects/dragspelhuset/, Erişim tarihi: 08.02.2025.
14. Elmokadem, A., Ekram, M., Waseef, A., & Nashaat, B., (2018). Kinetic architecture: Concepts, history and applications. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 7(4), 750-758.
15. Elkhayat, Y. O., (2023). Kinetic applications of smart materials in architecture: A descriptive analysis, Journal of Engineering Research, 7(6).
16. Emanuel. M., (1980). Contemporary architects, Springer, Berlin.
17. Engin, A. S., & Dinçer, A. E., (2021). Kinetik mimari cephelerin sınıflandırılması özelinde bir değerlendirme yaklaşımı. IDA: International Design and Art Journal, 3(1), 70–85.
18. Fisher, T., & Herr M.C., (2001). Teaching Generative Design. International Conference on Generative Art, Milan.
19. Fox, M. A., (2005). Sustainable applications of intelligent kinetic systems: Responsive skylights. MIT Kinetic Design Group, Department of Architecture, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
20. Fox, M., & Kemp, M., (2009). Interactive Architecture. Princeton Architectural Press.
21. Fox, M.A. & Yeh, B.P., (1999). Intelligent Kinetic Systems. Cambridge, MIT, 5-10.
22. Frazer, J., (2016). Parametric computation: History and future. Architectural Design, 86(2), 18–23.
23. Health and Research Institute, Erişim adresi: https://www.archdaily.com/533388/south-australian-health-and-medical-research-institute-woods-bagot?ad_medium=gallery, Erişim tarihi: 08.02.2025.
24. Hingston, P. F., Barone, L. C., & Michalewicz, Z., (2010). Design by evolution: Advances in evolutionary design. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
25. Inhabitat., (2006). Wind Shaped Pavillion, Erişim adresi: https://inhabitat.com/wind-shaped-pavilion/ , Erişim Tarihi: 10.05.2025.
26. Janssen, P., (2009). An evolutionary system for design exploration. CAADFutures 2009, http://papers.cumincad.org/data/works/att/cf2009_259.content.pdf
27. Kahramanoğlu B., & Çakıcı Alp N., (2021). Kinetik Sistemli Bina Cephelerinin Modelleme Yöntemlerinin İncelenmesi, Aurum Mühendislik Sistemleri ve Mimarlık Dergisi, 5 (1). 119-138.
28. Knippers, J., Oppe, M., Scheible, F., Jungjohann, H., (2012). Bio-Inspired Kinetic GFRP-Façade for the Thematic Pavilion of the EXPO 2012 in Yeosu, IASS-APCS Symposium 2012: From Spatial Structures to Space Structures, At Seoul.
29. Kolarevic, B., (2003). Architecture in the Digital Age: Design and Manufacturing. New York: Spon Press.
30. Kolarevic, B., (2009). Exploring architecture of change. ASCAAD Conference Proceedings, 16-26.
31. Kolaveric, B. & Parlac, V., (2015). Building Dynamics: Exploring Architecture of Change, New York: Routledge. Korkmaz K., (2009). Kinetik mimarlık üzerine. Arredamento Mimarlık, 220, 64-69.
32. Lorek, S., (2018). Rotating Skyscraper In Dubai Must Use BIM, Erişim adresi: https://constructible.trimble.com/construction-industry/rotating-skyscraper-in-dubai-must-use-bim-video, Erişim tarihi: 10.06.2025.
33. Maden, F., (2022). Tesselasyon Tabanlı Kinetik Cephe Tasarımları, Yaşar Üniversitesi, Mimarlık Fakültesi, Mimarlık Bölümü, February, s:104-111. Erişim adresi: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358900378. Media-TIC., Erişim adresi: ttps://www.arkitektuel.com/media-tic/, Erişim tarihi: 08.02.2025.
34. Megahed, N.A., (2017). Understanding kinetic architecture: typology, classification, and design strategy, Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 13(2), 130-146.
35. Menges, A., (2010). Hesaplamaya Dayalı Biçim Üretimi ve Malzemeleşme’nin Özgün Bir Sentezi, Mimarlık ve Yapı Malzemeleri Dergisi,15: s.33-40.
36. Moloney, J., (2011). Designing kinetics for architectural facades: state change. Taylor &Francis.
37. Mountstephens, J. & Teo, J., (2020). Progress and Challenges in Generative Product Design: A Review of Systems. Computers, 9 (4), 80.
38. Oxman, R., (2008). Performance-based Design: Current Practices and Research Issues, International Journal of Architectural Computing, 6(1), 1-17.
39. Palabıyık, S., & Demircan, D., (2020). Mimarlıkta Hesaplamalı Tasarım Yöntemlerine Ait Potansiyellerin Yaşam Döngüsü Modeli Üzerinden Değerlendirilmesi, International Refereed Journal of Architecture and Design, 21, 91-123.
40. Phocas. M.C., (2013). Initiations and Future Directions in the Development of Kinetic Structures for Earthquake Resistance, J Archit Eng Tech, 3(4).
41. Ramzy, N., & Fayed, H., (2011). Kinetic systems in architecture: New approach for environmental control systems and context-sensitive buildings, Sustainable Cities and Society, 1, 170-177.
42. Randl. C., (2008). Revolving architecture: A history of buildings that rotate, Swivel, and Pivot. USA: Princeton Architectural Press, New York.
43. Rocker, I., (2006). When code matters. Architectural Design, 76(4), 16–25.
44. Ron, R., Weissenböck, R., & Harari, T., (2013). Kinetic architecture matrix (ICAMA). International Conference on Adaptation and Movement in Architecture (ICAMA2013), Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada.
45. Sanchez-del-Valle, C., (2005). Adaptive kinetic architecture: A portal to digital prototyping. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA) (pp. 128–140).
46. Schumacher, M., Schaeffer, O., & Vogt, M. M., (2009). Move: Architecture in motion – Dynamic components and elements. Birkhäuser.
47. SDU Campus Kolding, Erişim adresi: https://www.archdaily.com/590576/sdu-campus-kolding-henning-larsen-architects, Erişim tarihi: 08.02.2025.
48. Sharifi-ha Evi, Erişim adresi: https://mimdap.org/mimarlik-gundemi/sharifi-ha-evi-nextoffice-alireza-taghaboni/, Erişim tarihi: 08.02.2025.
49. Shi, X., & Yang, W. (2013). Performance-driven architectural design and optimization technique from a perspective of architects, Automation in Construction, 32, 125-135.
50. Soyluk, A., & Sarıcıoğlu, P., (2015). Kinetik Mimarlıkta Cephede Origami ve Akıllı Malzeme Kullanımı, Mimaran Dergisi, 9 (12), 62-66.
51. Tagliabue., (2008). A Builder's 360° Vision Didn't Move His Neighbors. The New York Times. Erişim adresi: https://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/02/world/europe/02belgium.html
52. Thyssen Krupp Genel Merkezi, Erişim adresi: https://legantmar.livejournal.com/99934.html, Erişim tarihi: 08.02.2025.
53. Yanchanka, S., (2024). In motion: From kinetic architecture theory to computational realisation [Master's thesis, Politecnico di Torino]. Erişim adresi: https://webthesis.biblio.polito.it/30174/
54. Waseef A., & Nashaat B., (2017). Towards a new classification for responsive kinetic facades. Memaryat International Conference "MIC 2017” At: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
55. Wing, J. M., (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 366, 3717–3725.