OUTCOME AND PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH HEMATOLOGICAL MALIGNANCY ADMITTED TO AN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT: A SINGLE-CENTER STUDY
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to determine if the prognostic factors associated with intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes in patients with hematological malignancy help determine the course of treatment.
Materials and Method: In this study, 107 adult patients with hematological malignancies, requiring ICU admission in 2014–2020 at Medipol University Hospital, were retrospectively screened. The collected data included: demographic characteristics, sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, and the use of noninvasive/invasive mechanical ventilation during the ICU stay. The prognostic factors of the patients that received blood transfusions and those that did not receive blood transfusions as part of their treatment were compared.
Results: Among the 107 patients with hematological malignancy that were admitted to the ICU, 67 (62.6%) were men. Of the patients admitted to the ICU, 39.3% had acute myeloid leukemia. The non-survivor rate was significantly higher in patients with a SOFA score>=2 (87.7%) and those that were intubated (98.7%) (p<0.05). The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) score and creatinine levels were significantly higher in the non-survivor group (p<0.05). The pH values and base deficit values were significantly lower in the non-survivor group (p<0.05). The mean hemoglobin values on the first day of admittance to the ICU were 8.57±1.68 (4.9-13.6) and during the ICU stay average of 3 units were transfused. The C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and length of ICU stay (days) were significantly higher in the patients that received blood transfusions (p<0.05). The non-survivor rate (87.7%) was significantly higher in the patients with a SOFA score of (p<0.05).
Conclusion: If the prognostic factors of ICU outcomes in patients with a hematological disease are known, they can be used to help determine if mechanical ventilation, renal replacement, or blood transfusions are appropriate for patients with multiorgan failure. This multidisciplinary approach helps provide optimal treatment.
Keywords
References
- 1. 1. Practice parameters for hemodynamic support of sepsis in adult patients in sepsis. Task force of the American college of critical care medicine, Society of critical care medicine. Crit Care Med. 1999; 27(3): 639-660.
- 2. Mokart D, Etienne A, Essterni B, et al. Critically ill cancer patients in the intensive care unit: short-term outcome and 1-year mortality. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012; 56: 178-189.
- 3. Carson JL, Stanworth SJ, Roubinian N, et al. Transfusion threshold and other strategies for guiding allogeneic red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2012; 18(4): CD002042.
- 4. River EP, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Eng J Med. 2001; 345(19): 1368-1377.
- 5. Vincent JL. Indication for blood transfusions: Too complex to base on a single number? Ann Intern Med. 2010; 157: 71-72.
- 6. Villanueva C, Colomo A, Bosch A, et al. Transfusion strategies for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368: 11-21.
- 7. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A. Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013; 41(2): 580-637.
- 8. Benoit DD, Vandewoude KH, Decruyenaere JM, et al. Outcome and early prognostic indicators in patients with a hematologic malignancy admitted to the intensive care unit for a life-threatening complication. Crit Care Med. 2003; 31: 104-112.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Health Care Administration
Journal Section
Clinical Research
Publication Date
December 30, 2020
Submission Date
October 27, 2020
Acceptance Date
December 16, 2020
Published in Issue
Year 2020 Volume: 1 Number: 2