Two-Stage Revascularization Treatment of Symptomatic Bilateral Severe Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis-Consecutive Application of Carotid Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy in Same Patient

Year 2014, Volume: 17 Issue: 2, 135 - 137, 01.02.2013

Celal Kilit Ahmet Aksoy Tayfun Aydın Nail Sirek

https://doi.org/10.4274/khj.5197

Abstract

Since carotid artery atherosclerosis is the main physiopathological mechanism underlying stroke; treatment strategy is focused on resolving carotid artery stenosis. Today, carotid artery endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting are applied as treatment options in carotid artery diseases. With the decision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cardiology and Neurology joint council, two-stage revascularization procedure was decided to be performed in a 61-year-old male patient who had transient ischemic attack two weeks ago and had stenosis over 90% in both two internal carotid arteries. Because of high mortality risk due to carotid artery endarterectomy, carotid artery stenting was primarily performed in symptomatic left internal carotid artery. Mo.Ma® was preferred as the embolic protection device. Four weeks after stent implantation to left internal carotid artery, carotid endarterectomy was performed in right internal carotid artery by applying ultrasound-guided deep and superficial cervical plexus blockade. No permanent neurological damage was occurred during both two procedures. No new neurologic deficit was observed in postoperative 1st and 6th month controls. We treated bilateral internal carotid artery stenosis effectively and safely by performing two-stage revascularization treatment in our high operative risk case that had bilateral severe internal carotid artery stenosis.

Keywords

Internal carotid artery stenosis, carotid circulation transient ischemic attack; carotid endarterectomy; stents

Semptomatik İki Taraflı Ciddi İç Karotis Atardamarı Darlığında İki Aşamalı Revaskülarizasyon Tedavisi-Karotis Atardamar Stentleme ve Karotis Endarterektominin Aynı Hastada Ardışık Uygulaması

Abstract

Karotis arterinin aterosklerozu, inmenin temelindeki asıl fizyopatolojik mekanizmayı oluşturduğundan tedavi stratejisi karotis atardamar darlığını gidermeye odaklanmıştır. Günümüzde karotis endarterektomi ve karotis atardamar stentlemesi, karotis atardamar hastalıklarında tedavi seçenekleri olarak uygulanmaktadır. İki hafta önce geçici iskemik atak geçiren ve her iki iç karotis atardamarında %90'nın üzerinde darlık saptanan 61 yaşındaki erkek hastaya Kalp Damar Cerrahisi, Kardiyoloji ve Nöroloji ortak konseyi sonucu iki aşamalı revaskülarizasyon işlemi uygulanmasına karar verildi. Karotis endarterektomiye bağlı mortalite riskinin yüksek olarak değerlendirilmesi üzerine öncelikli olarak semptomatik sol iç karotis atardamarına karotis atardamar stentlemesi uygulandı. Emboli koruma cihazı olarak proksimal blokaj sistemi (Mo.Ma®) tercih edildi. Sol iç karotis atardamarına stent yerleştirilmesinden 4 hafta sonra sağ iç karotis atardamarına ultrason eşliğinde derin ve yüzeyel servikal ağ blokajı uygulanarak karotis endarterektomi operasyonu yapıldı. Her iki işlem esnasında kalıcı nörolojik hasar oluşmadı. Operasyon sonrası 1. ve 6. ay kontrollerinde de hastada yeni nörolojik hasar izlenmedi. Biz operasyon riski yüksek iki taraflı ciddi iç karotis atardamar darlığı olan olgumuzda iki aşamalı revaskülarizasyon tedavisi uygulayarak etkin ve güvenli bir şekilde iki taraflı iç karotis atardamar darlıklarının tedavisini gerçekleştirdik.

Keywords

İç karotid arter darlığı, karotid dolaşımı geçici iskemik atak; karotid endarterektomi; stentler

References

• Rothwell PM, Giles MF, Chandratheva A, Marquardt L, Geraghty O, Redgrave JN, et al. Early use of Existing Preventive Strategies for Stroke (EXPRESS) study. Effect of urgent treatment of transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke on early recurrent stroke (EXPRESS study): a prospective population-based sequential comparison. Lancet 2007;370:1432-42.
• Naylor AR. The importance of initiating ‘best medical therapy’ and intervening as soon as possible in patients with symptomatic carotid artery disease: time for a radical rethink of practice. J Cardiovasc Surg 2009;50:773-82.
• Grau AJ, Weimar C, Buggle F, Heinrich A, Goertler M, Neumaier S, et al. Risk factors, outcome, and treatment in subtypes of ischemic stroke: the German stroke data bank. Stroke 2001;32:2559-66.
• Kannel WB, McGee DL. Update on some epidemiologic features of intermittent claudication: the Framingham Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 1985;33:13-8.
• European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998;351:1379- 87.
• Lewis SC, Warlow CP, Bodenham AR, Colam B, Rothwell PM, Torgerson D, et al. General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2008;372:2132- 42.
• Brott TG, Hobson RW 2nd, Howard G, Roubin GS, Clark WM, Brooks W, et al. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 2010;363:11-23.
• Rudarakanchana N, Dialynas M, Halliday A. Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial-2 (ACST-2): rationale for a randomised clinical trial comparing carotid endarterectomy with carotid artery stenting in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009;38:239-42.
• Economopoulos KP, Sergentanis TN, Tsivgoulis G, Mariolis AD, Stefanadis C. Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a comprehensive meta-analysis of short-term and long-term outcomes. Stroke 2011;42:687- 92.