SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT FOR RURAL AREAS

Year 2015, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 44 - 50, 15.10.2015

Kubilay Kaptan

Abstract

Armenia is vulnerable to a number of disasters due to natural hazards, such as earthquake, drought, flood, landslide, mudslide, strong wind, snowstorm, frost and hail. In this study it is proposed a fast and simple seismic risk-assessment procedure for rural areas. Risk assessment is done by index-based method. The preliminary risk assessment is based on two types of data: geological and social.  The parameters describing geological conditions needed for this model are the following: seismic hazard level, active faults, landslides, reservoirs and rockfalls and the parameters describing social conditions are the following: number of people, total built area, number of pupils (if school exists),  health services and lifelines. As an important part of lifelines the roads to settlement are discussing. All these parameters were classified by their importance and were given weights concerning that.

Keywords

seismic risk, rural area, index-based method

References

• Balassanian S. Yu. (2003). Global Seismic risk mapping through a new approach for rapid seismic risk assessment, 2003 IUGG conference papers, p. 413-429
• Balassanian S. Yu. and Manukian A. (1994). Seismic Risk on Territory of the City of Yerevan, Armenia. Issues in Urban Earthquake Risk, NATO ASI Series, Vol. 271, p. 167-183
• Balassanian S. Yu, Melkoumian M. G., Arakelyan A. R. and Azarian, A. R. (1999). Seismic risk assessment for the territory of Armenia and strategy of its mitigation. Natural Hazards, Kluwer Academic Publishers, p.43-55
• Davidson R. A., Shah H. C. (1997). Un Urban Earthquake Disaster Risk Index, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Report No 121, p.3-269
• Pan American Health Organization and World Health Organization (2008). Hospital safety index: Guide for evaluators. Washington, D. C.
• Trendafiloski, G.S. (2006). Health facility seismic vulnerability evaluation – a handbook, DPR – DCS/CPS, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe (WHO/EURO)
• Tosun H., Zorluer İ., Orhan, A., Seyrek, et al. (2007). Seismic hazard and Total Risk Analyses for Large Dams in Euphares basin, Turkey. Engineering Geology 89, p. 155-170.
• Dwyer, A., Zoppou. C., Nielsen, O., Day, S. and Roberts, S.(2004), Quantifying Social Vulnerability: A methodology for Identifying those at risk to Natural Hazards, Geoscience Australia, Report No 14, p. 3-92 Applied Technology Council (1991). Seismic Vulnerability and Impact of Disruption of Lifelines in the Conterminous United States. ATC-25 Report, Redwood City, California