Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2019, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 34 - 38, 30.11.2019
https://doi.org/10.34088/kojose.517520

Abstract

References

  • International Atomic Energy Agency, 1999. Communications on Nuclear, Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety, Practical Handbook, IAEA(TECDOC-1076), Vienna.
  • Hutchison S. G., Hutchison F. I., 1997. Radioactivity in Everyday Life. Journal of Chemical Education, 74, 501–505.
  • International Atomic Energy Agency, 2011. Radiation Safety in Industrial Radiography, Specific Safety Guide(SSG-11), Vienna.
  • International Atomic Energy Agency, 1998. Lessons Learned From Accidents in Industrial Radiography, Safety Reports Series (No: 7), IAEA, Austria.
  • Sentinel, 2015. 880 Delta Operating and Maintenance Manuel, QSA Global, http://www.qsa-global.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/MAN-027. 2011.pdf
  • International Organization for Standardization, 2004. Radiation Protection, Apparatus for Industrial Gamma Radiography, Specifications for Performance, Design and Tests, 2nd ed., Geneva.
  • Official Gazette, 2005. Regulation on Radiation Protection and Licensing in Industrial Radiography, Number: 25869.
  • Chamberlain D. A., Edney R., Bleakley G., 1996. Robotic Handling of Gamma-Ray Sources in Site Radiography of Steel Storage Tanks. Paper Presented at the 13th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Tokyo, Japan, 11-13 June, pp. 654.
  • Members of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, 2007. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Annals of the ICRP, Publication 103, Elsevier, Exeter.
  • International Atomic Energy Agency, 2004. Personal Protective Equipment, Practical Radiation Technical Manual. IAEA, Vienna.
  • Official Gazette, 2000. Regulation on Radiation Safety, Number: 23999.
  • Nunnally J, Bernstein I, 1994. Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.

Knowledge and Behaviors of Industrial Radiography Workers about Radiation Protection

Year 2019, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 34 - 38, 30.11.2019
https://doi.org/10.34088/kojose.517520

Abstract

In our day, radiation sources have been used for useful purposes in industrial fields, but unrestrained and unconscious usage of radiation sources can be fatal. In this study, a survey has been shared online with 65 industrial radiography workers in order to assess their knowledge and behaviors towards radiation protection. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.85 demonstrated good reliability of the questionnaire. Of the participants, 53.8% had high school diploma and 29.2% had bachelor’s degree. The majority of workers (98.5%) was male and 43% of them had 11 years and more experience. The maximum percentages of industrial radiography workers’ knowledge about radiation safety basic concepts such as three basic principles of radiation protection, collimator, dosimeter usage in working condition A and effective dose were 95.4%, 93.9%, 93.8% and 90.8%, respectively. 65 participants (100%) agreed the definition as “I check radiography device and auxiliary equipment before the work commences”. 98.4% of the workers stated that they restricted the working area by using radiation warning signs and flashlights during the radiographic test. While working with radioactive sources, personnel must wear special PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) such as; lead gloves, lead glasses, lead apron, gonad and thyroid protection equipment etc.57% of radiographers (37) stated that they have been using the special PPE’s during the work. About 40% of responding workers (24) stated that they have not been using and 3% of them (4) stated that they have no idea about the usage of special PPE. Finally, survey results indicated that most of the radiographers who are occupationally exposed to radiation have a good knowledge and behaviors. However, some of them need to be trained about special radiation PPE usage.

References

  • International Atomic Energy Agency, 1999. Communications on Nuclear, Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety, Practical Handbook, IAEA(TECDOC-1076), Vienna.
  • Hutchison S. G., Hutchison F. I., 1997. Radioactivity in Everyday Life. Journal of Chemical Education, 74, 501–505.
  • International Atomic Energy Agency, 2011. Radiation Safety in Industrial Radiography, Specific Safety Guide(SSG-11), Vienna.
  • International Atomic Energy Agency, 1998. Lessons Learned From Accidents in Industrial Radiography, Safety Reports Series (No: 7), IAEA, Austria.
  • Sentinel, 2015. 880 Delta Operating and Maintenance Manuel, QSA Global, http://www.qsa-global.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/MAN-027. 2011.pdf
  • International Organization for Standardization, 2004. Radiation Protection, Apparatus for Industrial Gamma Radiography, Specifications for Performance, Design and Tests, 2nd ed., Geneva.
  • Official Gazette, 2005. Regulation on Radiation Protection and Licensing in Industrial Radiography, Number: 25869.
  • Chamberlain D. A., Edney R., Bleakley G., 1996. Robotic Handling of Gamma-Ray Sources in Site Radiography of Steel Storage Tanks. Paper Presented at the 13th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Tokyo, Japan, 11-13 June, pp. 654.
  • Members of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, 2007. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Annals of the ICRP, Publication 103, Elsevier, Exeter.
  • International Atomic Energy Agency, 2004. Personal Protective Equipment, Practical Radiation Technical Manual. IAEA, Vienna.
  • Official Gazette, 2000. Regulation on Radiation Safety, Number: 23999.
  • Nunnally J, Bernstein I, 1994. Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
There are 12 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Abdulkadir Yıldız

Hakan Pekey 0000-0002-6135-7770

Publication Date November 30, 2019
Acceptance Date August 28, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 2 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Yıldız, A., & Pekey, H. (2019). Knowledge and Behaviors of Industrial Radiography Workers about Radiation Protection. Kocaeli Journal of Science and Engineering, 2(2), 34-38. https://doi.org/10.34088/kojose.517520