NEW METRIC FOR THE CALCULATION OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS INDEX OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT USING MECHANISTIC-EMPIRICAL APPROACH, TURKEY-CASE STUDY

Year 2023, Volume: 11 Issue: 3, 831 - 870, 01.09.2023

Saadoon Obaid Eyada Eyada , Osman Nuri Çelik , Nibras Y. Abdulla

https://doi.org/10.36306/konjes.1303333

Abstract

The application of new Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Method (M-EDM) in Turkey needs a huge data about the materials properties under specific climate and traffic conditions. Sensitivity Analysis (SA) can reduce time, effort and cost required for the determination and collection of this data. One-At-a-Time (OAT) SA was conducted using different Quantitative and Qualitative methods. Graphical, Normalized Sensitivity Index NSI and Distance Sensitivity Index DSI were used to determine the most sensitive factors (property). DSI was used for the first time in this study to conduct SA for both continuous and categorical parameters using one equation. Two climate regions, three traffic categories and different types of asphalt were used. MnPave software was used to conduct Mechanistic-Empirical analysis. The results were important and many conclusions and recommendations were reported.

Keywords

Mechanistic-Empirical Design Method, Sensitivity Analysis, Normalized Sensitivity Index, Premature deterioration, MnPave, Distance Sensitivity Index, Turkey

References

• MnDOT, "MnDOT PAVEMENT DESIGN MANUAL," ed: Minnesota Department of Transportation2014.
• O. S. a. H. V. Quintus, "TRAFFIC LOAD SPECTRA FOR IMPLEMENTING AND USING THE MECHANISTIC-EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN GUIDE IN GEORGIA," Department of Transportation State of Georgia 10-09, PI # 0010110, 2014.
• G. Kollaros, A. Athanasopoulou, and A. Kokkalis, "Perpetual flexible pavement design life," CD-ROM Proceedings of BCRRA, pp. 537-542, 2017.
• I. Yut, J. Mahoney, and D. A. Larsen, "Preparation of the implementation plan of AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (M-EPDG) in Connecticut: Phase II: expanded sensitivity analysis and validation with pavement management data," University of Connecticut2017.
• L. S. P. Gopisetti, H. Ceylan, B. Cetin, S. Kim, and O. Kaya, "Sensitivity Analysis of New Reflective Cracking Model in Pavement Mechanistic-Empirical Design," in Geo-Congress 2020: Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Special Topics, 2020, pp. 508-516.
• C. W. Schwartz, R. Li, S. Kim, H. Ceylan, and K. Gopalakrishnan, "Sensitivity evaluation of MEPDG performance prediction," 2011.
• H. Ceylan, S. Kim, K. Gopalakrishnan, C. W. Schwartz, and R. Li, "Sensitivity analysis frameworks for mechanistic-empirical pavement design of continuously reinforced concrete pavements," Construction and Building Materials, vol. 73, pp. 498-508, 2014.
• E. G. Fernando, J. Oh, and D. Ryu, "Phase I of ME PDG Program Implementation in Florida," 2007.
• C. Schwartz, "Implementation of the NCHRP 1-37A Design Guide, Report No," SP0077B41, Maryland State Highway Administration, Lutherville, MD, 2007.
• R. Velasquez, K. Hoegh, I. Yut, N. Funk, G. Cochran, M. Marasteanu, et al., "Implementation of the MEPDG for new and rehabilitated pavement structures for design of concrete and asphalt pavements in Minnesota," 2009.
• S. Esfandiarpour, M. A. Ahammed, A. Shalaby, T. Liske, and S. Kass, "Sensitivity of pavement ME design predicted distresses to asphalt materials inputs," in Proceedings of the 2013 Conference and Exhibition of the Transportation Association of Canada-Transportation: Better-Faster-Safer (TAC/ATC’13), 2013.
• Y. R. Kim, Implementation plan for the new mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide: NC Department of Transportation Research and Analysis Group, 2007.
• R. Baus and N. Stires, "Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide implementation," 2010.