Yapay Zekâ Destekli Bibliyometrik İnceleme ile Ekofeminizm ve Ekomodernizm Literatürlerinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi

Year 2025, Volume: 2 Issue: 50, 28 - 48, 04.01.2026

İlknur Esen Yıldırım , Derin Savaşan

https://doi.org/10.35343/kosbed.1824939

Abstract

destekli bir yaklaşım benimsenmiştir. Bu bağlamda, 2000–2025 yılları için ekofeminizm ve ekomodernizm literatürleri ele alınmıştır. İlgili veri seti Web of Science (WoS) veritabanından “ecofeminism” ve “ecomodernism” anahtar kelimeleri ile yapılan tarama sonucunda derlenmiştir. Her iki literatür için VOSviewer programı aracılığıyla anahtar temalar, kavramsal kesişimler, ülkeler ve yazarlar arası sosyal ağlar, disiplinler arası bağlantılar ortaya çıkarılmış; bibliyometrik ağ haritaları üretilmiştir. Elde edilen bulguların yorumlanması ve kavramsallaştırılması aşamalarında ChatCPT ve MANUS yazılımlarından destek alınmıştır. Araştırma kapsamında ekofeminizm ve ekomodernizm literatürlerinin çevre politikaları, sürdürülebilirlik ve etik perspektiflerinden akademik katkıları ortaya çıkarılmış; farklılaşan alanlarının yanı sıra potansiyel iş birliği alanları da teşhis edilmiştir.

Keywords

Ekofeminizm , ekomodernizm , bibliyometrik analiz , yapay zeka

Ethical Statement

Yazarlar çalışmanın tüm süreçlerinin araştırma ve yayın etiğine uygun olduğunu, etik kurallara ve bilimsel atıf gösterme ilkelerine uyduğunu beyan etmektedir. Araştırma etik izin gerektirmemektedir.

Supporting Institution

Bu çalışma mali açıdan desteklenmemiştir.

AI-Supported Bibliometric Review of Ecofeminism and Ecomodernism Literatures: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract

In this study, an artificial intelligence–supported approach was adopted to enhance the bibliometric analysis process. Within this framework, the literatures on ecofeminism and ecomodernism covering the years 2000–2025 were examined. The dataset was compiled from the Web of Science (WoS) database through searches conducted with the keywords “ecofeminism” and “ecomodernism.” For both literatures, key themes, conceptual intersections, social networks among countries and authors, and interdisciplinary connections were identified using the VOSviewer program, and bibliometric network maps were generated. In the stages of interpreting and conceptualizing the findings, support was obtained from ChatCPT and MANUS software. The research revealed the academic contributions of ecofeminism and ecomodernism literatures from the perspectives of environmental policies, sustainability, and ethics, while also diagnosing their divergent areas as well as potential fields of collaboration.

Keywords

Ecofeminism , Ecomodernism , Bibliometric Analysis , Artificial Intelligence

Ethical Statement

The authors declare that all processes of the study comply with research and publication ethics, adhere to ethical rules and principles of scientific citation. The study does not require ethical approval

Supporting Institution

This study was not financially supported.

References

• Asafu-Adjaye, J., Blomquist, L., Brand, S., Brook, B. W., DeFries, R., Ellis, E., Foreman, C., Keith, D., Lewis, M., Lynas, M., Nordhaus, T., Pielke, R., Pritzker, R., Roy, J., Sagoff, M., Shellenberger, M., Stone, R., & Teague, P. (2025, September 15). An Ecomodernist Manifesto. (2015) https://www.ecomodernism.org/
• Badoux, C. (1974). Françoise d'Eaubonne, «Le Féminisme ou la Mort», éd. P. Horay. Les cahiers du GRIF, 4(1), 66-67.
• Blomqvist, L., Nordhaus, T., & Shellenberger, M. (2015). Nature Unbound: Decoupling for Conservation. Breakthrough Institute.
• Dinç, S., & Erdoğan, E. (2023). İklim Kaygı Ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye Uyarlanması, Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği: Sağlık Çalışanları Örneklemi. Journal of Nursology, 26(3), 206-211. https://doi.org/10.5152/JANHS.2023.22282
• Ellis, E. C. (2015). Ecology in an Anthropogenic Biosphere. Ecological Monographs, 85(3), 287–331. HTTPS://DOİ.ORG/10.1890/14-2274.1
• Ellis, E. C., Lynas, M., & Nordhaus, T. (2024). Ecomodernism: A clarifying perspective. The Anthropocene Review, 11(3), 684-685. https://doi.org/10.1177/20530196231221495
• Gaard, G. (2015). Ecofeminism and climate change. In Women's Studies International Forum (49), 20-33. Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2015.02.004
• Gaard, G. (2011). Ecofeminism revisited: Rejecting essentialism and re-placing species in a material feminist Environmentalism. Feminist Formations, 23(2), 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2011.0017
• Gaard, G., & Gruen, L. (1993). Ecofeminism: Toward global justice and planetary health. Society & Nature, 2(1), 1–35.
• Kareiva, P., & Fuller, E. (2016). Beyond Resilience: How to Better Prepare for the Profound Disruption of the Anthropocene. Global Policy, 7, 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12330
• Mellor, M. (1997). Feminism and Ecology: An Introduction. New York: New York University Press.
• Md Safiqur Rahaman, Hardesh Kumar, Khadeeja MN Ansari & Ziaur Rahman. (2023). Research Trends on Environmentalism: A Bibliometric Analysis and Review of Literature. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (QQML) 12(1): 43-76.
• Nordhaus, T., & Shellenberger, M. (2007). Break through: From the death of environmentalism to the politics of possibility. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
• Merchant, C. (2014). Earthcare: Women and the Environment. Routledge.
• Melnikova, E. V. (2022). Big data technology in the set of methods and means of scientific research in modern scientometrics. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 49(2), 102-107. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688222020083
• OECD. (2025, November 10). Gender equality and women’s empowerment in development cooperation (2008). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0103_EN.html?redirect
• Okafor, C. C., Otunomo, F. A., Nnadi, V. E., Nzekwe, C. A., Nwoye, A. V., & Ajaero, C. C. (2025). Artificial intelligence in Environmental research: bibliometric, text mining and content analysis. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5(1), 124.
• Oliński, M., Krukowski, K., & Sieciński, K. (2024). Bibliometric overview of ChatGPT: New perspectives in social sciences. Publications, 12(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications12010009
• Parıltı, K. (2025). Türkiye'deki kadın ve çevre aktivistlerinin direnişi üzerinden inşa edilen ekofeminizmin özellikleri. (Tez No: 928287). [Yüksek lisans tezi, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi].
• Parmesan, C., Morecroft, M. D., & Trisurat, Y. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press.
• Salleh, A. (1997). Ecofeminism as politics: Nature, Marx, and the postmodern. Zed Books.
• Semrl, N., Feigl, S., Taumberger, N., Bracic, T., Fluhr, H., Blockeel, C., & Kollmann, M. (2023). AI language models in human reproduction research: Exploring ChatGPT’s potential to assist academic writing. Human Reproduction, 38(12), 2281–2288. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead207
• Shen, M., Li, Y., Chen, L., & Yang, Q. (2025). From mind to machine: The rise of Manus AI as a fully autonomous digital agent. Virginia Tech, Brown University, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
• Shiva, V. (1989). Staying Alive: Women, Ecology, and Development. North Atlantic Books.
• Symons, J. (2019). Ecomodernism: Technology, Politics and the Climate Crisis. John Wiley & Sons.
• UN Women. (2018). Turning promises into action: Gender equality in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations.