Year 2019, Volume , Issue 37, Pages 195 - 215 2019-06-30

İşin Önemi ve Yönetici Desteğinin Bireysel Yaratıcılık Üzerindeki Etkisi

Hülya Gündüz Çekmecelioğlu [1] , Hilal Gökkaya [2]


Yaratıcılık örgütlerin hızla değişen pazarlara ve teknolojik koşullara adapte olmasını sağlayan inovasyonun temel sürücü gücü olarak görülmektedir. Bireysel bir özellik olmakla birlikte, örgütsel çevre unsurları bireysel yaratıcılığın yaratıcı sonuçlara ve inovasyona yönlendirilmesinde önemli bir etkiye sahiptir. Bu nedenle mevcut çalışma yaratıcılığı destekleyen yönetici tutum ve davranışlarının ve iş özelliklerinden biri olan işin öneminin çalışanların bireysel yaratıcılıkları üzerindeki etkisini inceleyen bir model önermektedir. Model, Kocaeli bölgesinde, onaylı ARGE Merkezine sahip ve kimya sektöründe faaliyet gösteren işletmelerden 100 yönetici ve çalışan katılımı ile test edilmiştir. PLS-SEM analizinden elde edilen sonuçlar hem yöneticilerin yaratıcılığı destekleyen tutum ve davranışlarının hem de işin öneminin bireysel yaratıcılığın sıklıkla sergilenmesinde etkili olduğunu göstermektedir.


yaratıcılık, işin önemi, yönetici desteği
  • Allan, B. A. (2017). Task significance and meaningful work: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 174-182.
  • Allan, B. A., Autin, K. L., & Duffy, R. D. (2014). Examining social class and work meaning within the psychology of working framework. Journal of Career Assessment, 22(4), 543–561.
  • Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157-183.
  • Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 367–403.
  • Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of management journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
  • Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357.
  • Babin, Barry J., and Göran Svensson.(2012). "Structural equation modeling in social science research: Issues of validity and reliability in the research process." European Business Review 24.4: 320-330.
  • Bailey, C., & Madden, A. (2016). What makes work meaningful or meaningless?. MIT Sloan Management Review, 57(4).Balay, R. (2010). The organizational creativity perceptions of academic staff. Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Dergisi, 43(1), 41.Basadur, M. (1991). Managing the creative process in organizations. Working paper No:358Bhagat, R.
  • S., & Chassue, M. B. (1980). Effects of changes in job characteristics on some theory-specific attitudinal outcomes: Results from a naturally occurring experiment. Human Relations, 33, 297-313.Çekmecelioğlu,
  • H. G., & Özbağ, G. K. (2016). Psychological empowerment and support for innovation in Turkish manufacturing industry: Relations with individual creativity and firm innovativeness. JEEMS Journal of East European Management Studies, 21(1), 10-34.
  • Çekmecelioğlu, H. G. & Günsel, A. (2011). Promoting creativity among employees of mature industries: The effects of autonomy and role stress on creative behaviors and job performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 889-895.
  • Champoux, J. E. (1992). A multivariate analysis of curvilinear relationships among job scope, work context satisfactions, and affective outcomes, Human Relations, 45, 87-111.
  • Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1)
  • Christian, M.S., Garza, A.S. and Slaughter, J.E. (2011), “Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 64 No. 1, pp. 89-136
  • Chur-Hansen, A., & McLean, S. (2006). On being a supervisor: the importance of feedback and how to give it. Australasian Psychiatry, 14(1), 67-71.
  • Coelho, F., & Augusto, M. (2010). Job characteristics and the creativity of frontline service employees. Journal of Service Research, 13(4), 426-438.
  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
  • Cunningham, J. B., & Mac Gregor, J. (2000). Trust and the design of work: Complementary constructs in satisfaction and performance. Human Relations, 53, 1575-1591
  • Delbecq, A. L. & Mills, P. K. (1985). Managerial practices that enhance innovation. Organizational Dynamics, 14 (1), 24-34.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life's domains. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(1), 14.
  • Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A., & Kazanjian, R. K. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Academy of management review, 24(2), 286-307.
  • Doyague, M. F., González-Álvarez, N., & Nieto, M. (2008). An examination of individual factors and employees' creativity: The case of Spain. Creativity Research Journal, 20(1), 21-33.
  • Elsbach, K. D., & Hargadon, A. B. (2006). Enhancing creativity through “mindless” work: A framework of workday design. Organization science, 17(4), 470-483.
  • Eren, E. ve Gündüz, H. (2002). İş Çevresinin Yaratıcılık Üzerindeki Etkileri Ve Bir Araştırma Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, (5), 65-84
  • Ettlie, J. E., & O'Keefe, R. D. (1982). Innovative Attitudes, Values, and Intentions in Organizations [1]. Journal of Management studies, 19(2), 163-182.
  • Eysenck, H. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: Suggestions for a theory. Psychological inquiry, 4(3), 147-178.
  • Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and social psychology review, 2(4), 290-309.
  • Farr, J. L., & West, M. A. (Eds.). (1990). Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies. Wiley.
  • Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
  • Franken C (2001) A.S. Byatt: art, authorship, creativity. Palgrave, Basingstoke, UK.
  • Fox, S., & Feldman, G. (1988). Attention state and critical psychological states as mediator between job dimensions and outcomes. Human Relations, 41, 229-245.
  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American psychologist, 56(3), 218.
  • Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions?. Review of general psychology, 2(3), 300-319.
  • Fried, Y., & Ferris, G. R. (1987). The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta‐analysis. Personnel psychology, 40(2), 287-322.
  • Garson, S. D. (2016) Partial Least Squares: Regression & Structural Equation Models. Statistical Publishing Associates, USA.
  • George, J. M. (2007). 9 Creativity in organizations. The academy of management annals, 1(1), 439-477.
  • George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don’t: The role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 687–697.
  • Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of management Journal, 52(4), 765-778.
  • Griffin, R. W. (1991). Effects of work redesign on employee perceptions, attitudes, and behavior: A longterm investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 425-435.
  • Griffin, R. W. (1987). Toward an integrated theory of task design. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9: 79 –120.
  • Griffin, R. W. (1983). Objective and social sources of information in task redesign: A field experiment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 184-200.
  • Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265-275.
  • Gumusluoglu, L., & Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. Journal of business research, 62(4), 461-473.
  • Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2016). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. 3. Baskı. Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159-170.
  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250-279.
  • Harrison, M. M., Neff, N. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of individual creativity and innovation. In 21st Annual Conference for the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas.
  • Hon, A. H., Chan, W. W., & Lu, L. (2013). Overcoming work-related stress and promoting employee creativity in hotel industry: The role of task feedback from supervisor. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 33, 416-424.
  • Höck, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2006). Strategic networks in the software industry: An empirical analysis of the value continuum. In IFSAM VIIIth World Congress (Vol. 28, p. 2010).
  • Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of applied psychology, 92(5), 1332.
  • Isen, A. M. (1999). Positive affect. Handbook of cognition and emotion, 20, 522-539.
  • Imran,A., Murad, A., Saeed, B. and Thamer, A. S. B. (2018). Examining The Role Of Childhood Experiences In Developing Altruistic And Knowledge Sharing Behaviors Among Children In Their Later Life: A Partial Least Squares (PLS) Path Modeling Approach. Journal of Sustainability 10, 292.
  • Iqbal, Q., Ahmad, N. H., & Ahmad, B. (2018). Enhancing sustainable performance through job characteristics via workplace spirituality: A study on SMEs. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management.
  • Jackson, P. R., Paul, L. J., & Wall, T. D. (1981). Individual differences as moderators of reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 54, 1-8.
  • Jafri, M. H. (2018). Moderating Role of Job Autonomy and Supervisor Support in Trait Emotional Intelligence and Employee Creativity Relationship. Vision, 22(3), 253-263.
  • Jung, D. I. (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and their effects on creativity in groups. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 185-195.
  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692–724.
  • Kim, T. Y., Hon, A. H., & Crant, J. M. (2009). Proactive personality, employee creativity, and newcomer outcomes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(1), 93-103.
  • Kimberley, J. R. and M. J. Evanisko (1981), "Organizational Innovation: The Influence of Individual, Organizational and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adaptation of Technological and Administrative Innovations", Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 24, pp. 689-713.
  • Kimberley, J. R. (1981), "Managing Innovation", in Handbook of Organizational Design, P. C. Nystrom and W. H. Starbuck (editors), pp. 84-104, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Lim, L. P., Garnsey, E., & Gregory, M. (2006). Product and process innovation in biopharmaceuticals: a new perspective on development. R&D Management, 36(1), 27-36.
  • Lips-Wiersma, M., & Wright, S. (2012). Measuring the meaning of meaningful work: Development and validation of the Comprehensive Meaningful Work Scale (CMWS). Group & Organization Management, 37(5), 655-685.
  • Li, L., Li, G., Shang, Y., & Xi, Y. (2015). When does perceived leader regulatory-focused modeling lead to subordinate creativity? The moderating role of job complexity. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(22), 2872-2887.
  • Lips-Wiersma, M., & Morris, L. (2009). Discriminating between ‘meaningful work’and the ‘management of meaning’. Journal of business ethics, 88(3), 491-511.
  • Madjar, N., Oldham, G. R., & Pratt, M. G. (2002). There's no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees' creative performance. Academy of Management journal, 45(4), 757-767.
  • Martins, E. C., & Terblanche, F. (2003). Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European journal of innovation management, 6(1), 64-74.
  • Martins, E., & Martins, N. (2002). An organisational culture model to promote creativity and innovation. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 28(4), 58-65.
  • Mathieu, J. E., Hoffman, D. A., & Farr, J. L. (1993). Job perception-job satisfaction relations: An empirical comparison of three competing theories. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 370-387.
  • Mostafa, M. (2005). Factors affecting organisational creativity and innovativeness in Egyptian business organisations: an empirical investigation. Journal of Management Development, 24(1), 7-33.
  • Moyle, P. (1998). Longitudinal influences of managerial support on employee well-being. Work & Stress, 12(1), 29-49.
  • Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The leadership quarterly, 13(6), 705-750.
  • Mumford, M. D., & Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creativity in the workplace: People, problems, and structures. The journal of creative behavior, 31(1), 1-6.
  • Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological bulletin, 103(1), 27.
  • Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
  • Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., & Pluntke, F. (2006). Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(3), 257-279.
  • Orpen, C. (1990). Measuring support for organizational innovation: A validity study. Psychological Reports, 67(2), 417-418.
  • Öcal, K. (2011). Predicting Employee Performance in Non-Profit Sport Organizations: The Role of Managerial and Financial Performance and the Mediating Role of Support for Innovation and Individual Creativity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
  • Öztürk, F. (2010). Determinants of organizational citizenship behavior among knowledge workers: The role of job characteristics, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation), Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
  • Parker, S. K., & Ohly, S. (2009). Extending the Reach of Job Design Theory: Going Beyond the Job Characteristics Model. The Sage handbook of human resource management, 269.
  • Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of applied psychology, 91(3), 636.
  • Phillips, J. S., & Freedman, S. M. (1984). Situational performance constraints, task characteristics and their relationship with motivation and satisfaction. Journal of Management, 10, 321-331.
  • Raja, U., & Johns, G. (2010). The joint effects of personality and job scope on in-role performance, citizenship behaviors, and creativity. human relations, 63(7), 981-1005.
  • Ramus, C. A., & Steger, U. (2000). The roles of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee “Ecoinitiatives” at leading-edge European companies. Academy of Management journal, 43(4), 605-626.
  • Redmond, M. R., Mumford, M. D., & Teach, R. (1993). Putting creativity to work: Effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 55(1), 120-151.
  • Rice, G. (2006). Individual values, organizational context, and self-perceptions of employee creativity: Evidence from Egyptian organizations. Journal of Business Research, 59(2), 233-241.
  • Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in organizational behavior, 30, 91-127.
  • Saavedra, R., & Kwun, S. K. (2000). Affective states in job characteristics theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 131-146.
  • Schaubroeck, J.aAnd Jennıngs, K. R. (1991), A longitudinal investigation of factors mediating the participative decision making job satisfaction linkage, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26, 4M8.
  • Schaubroeck, J., Ganster, D. C., Sime, W. E. and Ditman, D. (1993). A field experiment testing supervisory role clarification, Personnel Psychology, 46, 1-25.
  • Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The efects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativiy: Whereshouldwegofrom here. JournalafManagemen 站, 30, 933-958.
  • Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. C. (2000). Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: Effects on satisfaction and intentions to leave. Academy of management journal, 43(2), 215-223.
  • Sousa, C. M., & Coelho, F. (2011). From personal values to creativity: evidence from frontline service employees. European Journal of Marketing, 45(7/8), 1029-1050.
  • Steger, M. F., & Dik, B. J. (2010). Work as Meaning: Individual and Organizational Benefits of Engaging in Meaningful Work. 11.
  • Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and Paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity, pp. 3-15. Cambridge University Press, UK
  • Tierney, P. & Farmer, S. M. (2004). An application of the Pygmalion process to subordinate creativity. Journal of Management, 30, 413–432.
  • Tierney, P. & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management journal, 45(6), 1137-1148.
  • Tsaur, S. H., Yen, C. H., & Yang, W. Y. (2011). Do job characteristics lead to employee creativity in travel agencies?. International Journal of Tourism Research, 13(2), 191-204.
  • Tyagi, P.K.(1985). Relative Importance of Key Job Dimensions and Leadership Behaviors in Motivating Salesperson Work Performance. Journal of Marketing, Summer.
  • Velayutham, Sunitadevi, Jill M. Aldridge, and Barry Fraser. (2012)"Gender differences in student motivation and self-regulation in science learning: A multi-group structural equation modeling analysis." International journal of science and mathematics education 10.6 :1347-1368.
  • Wang, A. C., & Cheng, B. S. (2010). When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of organizational behavior, 31(1), 106-121.
  • Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of management review, 18(2), 293-321.
  • Zampetakis, L. A., Bouranta, N., & Moustakis, V. S. (2010). On the relationship between individual creativity and time management. Thinking skills and creativity, 5(1), 23-32.
  • Zhou, J., & Hoever, I. J. (2014). Research on workplace creativity: A review and redirection. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), 333-359.
  • Zhou, J., Shin, S. J., Brass, D. J., Choi, J., & Zhang, Z. X. (2009). Social networks, personal values, and creativity: Evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects. Journal of applied psychology, 94(6), 1544.
  • Zhou, J. (2003). When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. Journal of applied psychology, 88(3), 413.
  • Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management journal, 44(4), 682-696.
Primary Language tr
Subjects Management
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Orcid: 0000-0002-0123-4939
Author: Hülya Gündüz Çekmecelioğlu
Institution: KOCAELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Country: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0003-1997-4641
Author: Hilal Gökkaya (Primary Author)
Institution: KOCAELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Country: Turkey


Dates

Publication Date : June 30, 2019

Bibtex @research article { kosbed553681, journal = {Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi}, issn = {1302-6658}, address = {kosbed@kocaeli.edu.tr}, publisher = {Kocaeli University}, year = {2019}, volume = {}, pages = {195 - 215}, doi = {10.35343/kosbed.553681}, title = {İşin Önemi ve Yönetici Desteğinin Bireysel Yaratıcılık Üzerindeki Etkisi}, key = {cite}, author = {Gündüz Çekmecelioğlu, Hülya and Gökkaya, Hilal} }
APA Gündüz Çekmecelioğlu, H , Gökkaya, H . (2019). İşin Önemi ve Yönetici Desteğinin Bireysel Yaratıcılık Üzerindeki Etkisi. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi , (37) , 195-215 . DOI: 10.35343/kosbed.553681
MLA Gündüz Çekmecelioğlu, H , Gökkaya, H . "İşin Önemi ve Yönetici Desteğinin Bireysel Yaratıcılık Üzerindeki Etkisi". Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (2019 ): 195-215 <https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/kosbed/issue/47051/553681>
Chicago Gündüz Çekmecelioğlu, H , Gökkaya, H . "İşin Önemi ve Yönetici Desteğinin Bireysel Yaratıcılık Üzerindeki Etkisi". Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (2019 ): 195-215
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - İşin Önemi ve Yönetici Desteğinin Bireysel Yaratıcılık Üzerindeki Etkisi AU - Hülya Gündüz Çekmecelioğlu , Hilal Gökkaya Y1 - 2019 PY - 2019 N1 - doi: 10.35343/kosbed.553681 DO - 10.35343/kosbed.553681 T2 - Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 195 EP - 215 VL - IS - 37 SN - 1302-6658- M3 - doi: 10.35343/kosbed.553681 UR - https://doi.org/10.35343/kosbed.553681 Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote %0 Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi İşin Önemi ve Yönetici Desteğinin Bireysel Yaratıcılık Üzerindeki Etkisi %A Hülya Gündüz Çekmecelioğlu , Hilal Gökkaya %T İşin Önemi ve Yönetici Desteğinin Bireysel Yaratıcılık Üzerindeki Etkisi %D 2019 %J Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi %P 1302-6658- %V %N 37 %R doi: 10.35343/kosbed.553681 %U 10.35343/kosbed.553681
ISNAD Gündüz Çekmecelioğlu, Hülya , Gökkaya, Hilal . "İşin Önemi ve Yönetici Desteğinin Bireysel Yaratıcılık Üzerindeki Etkisi". Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 37 (June 2019): 195-215 . https://doi.org/10.35343/kosbed.553681
AMA Gündüz Çekmecelioğlu H , Gökkaya H . İşin Önemi ve Yönetici Desteğinin Bireysel Yaratıcılık Üzerindeki Etkisi. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2019; (37): 195-215.
Vancouver Gündüz Çekmecelioğlu H , Gökkaya H . İşin Önemi ve Yönetici Desteğinin Bireysel Yaratıcılık Üzerindeki Etkisi. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2019; (37): 215-195.