BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

İnovasyon ve Rekabet Açısından Kızıl Kraliçe Etkisi

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 65 - 78, 01.12.2011

Oktay Koç Çağla Yavuz

Öz

Bu çalışma esasen, rekabetçilik bağlamında inovasyonun yaratımı açısından Kızıl Kraliçe Etkisi’nin belirleyici rolünü tartışmayı amaçlamıştır. Bu amaçla çalışma, rekabetin meşru oyuncularına odaklanmış ve böylece Kızıl Kraliçe Etkisi’nin özellikle inovasyon bağlamında rekabet üstünlüğü elde etmek açısından ilgili örgütsel alanlardaki fonksiyonunu ortaya koymuştur

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kızıl Kraliçe Etkisi İnovasyon Rekabet Rakip

Kaynakça

  • Barnett, W. P., (2008) The Red Queen among Organizations, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Burt, R. S., (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge, Massachusetts ve London: Harvard University Press.
  • Carroll, L.,(1960).The annotated Alice: Alice’s adventures in wonderland and through the looking glass, New York: New American Library.
  • OECD, (2005). Oslo Manual, Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data, Paris: OECD.
  • Schumpeter, J.A., (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Trott, P., (2005). Innovation Management and New Product Development, Third Edition, London: Prentice Hall.
  • Aghion, P., Haris, C., Howitt, P. ve Vickers, J., (2001). “Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step-by-Step Innovation”, The Review of Economic Studies, 68: 467–492.
  • Baumol, W. J., (2004). “Red-Queen Games: Arms Races, Rule of Law and Market Economies”, Journal of Evolutionary Economies, 14: 237–247.
  • Barkema, H. G., Baum, J. A.C., Mannix, E. A., (2002). “Management Challenges in a New Time”, Academy of Management Journal, 45: 916–930.
  • Barnett, W. P., and Hansen, M. T., (1996). “The Red Queen in Organizational Evolution”, Strategic Management Journal, 17: 139–157.
  • Barnett, W. P. and McKendrick, D. G., (2004). “Why Are Some Organizations More Competitive than Others? Evidence from a Changing Global Market”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 535–571.
  • Barnett, W. P., and Pontikes, E. G., (2008). “The Red Queen, Success Bias, and Organizational Inertia”, Management Science, 54: 1237–1251.
  • Barnett, W. P., and Freeman, J., (2001). “Too Much of a Good Thing? Product Proliferation and Organizational Failure”, Organization Science, 12: 539–558.
  • Barney, J. B. ve Zajac, E. J., (1994). “Competitive Organizational Behavior: Toward an Organizationally - Based Theory of Competitive Advantage”, Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue: Competitive Organizational Behavior, 15: 5–9.
  • Christensen, C. M. ve Bower, J. L., (1996). “Customer Power, Strategic Investment, and the Failure of Leading Firms”, Strategic Management Journal, 17: 197–218.
  • Cliff, D. ve Miller, G. F., (1995). “Tracking The Red Queen: Measurements of adaptive progress in co-evolutionary simulations”, Advances in Artificial Life, 929: 200-218.
  • Derfus, P. J., Maggitti, P. G., Grimm, C. ve Smith, K. G., (2008). “The Red Queen Effect: Competitive Actions and Firm Performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 51: 61–80.
  • Dosi,G., (1988). “Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation”, Journal of Economic Literature, 26: 1120–1171.
  • Ebner, M., (2006). “Coevolution and the Red Queen effect shape virtual plants”, Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 7: 103–123.
  • Ebner, M., Grigore, A., Heffner, A. ve Albert, J., (2002). “Coevolution produces an arm races among virtual plants”, Genetic Programming, 2278: 114-170.
  • Glazebrook, J. F. ve ve Wallace, R., (2009) “Small worlds and Red Queens in the Global Workspace: An information-theoretic approach”, Cognitive Systems Research, 10(4): 1–33.
  • Kerin, R. A., Varadarajan, P. R. ve Peterson, R. A., (1992). “First-Mover Advantage: A Synthesis, Conceptual Framework, and Research Propositions”, The Journal of Marketing, 56: 33–52.
  • Kothandaraman P., ve Wilson, D. T., (2001). “The Future of Competition”, Industrial Marketing Management, 30: 379–389.
  • Lewin, A. Y. ve Volberda, H. W., (1999). “Prolegomena on Coevolution: A Framework for Research on Strategy and New Organizational Forms”, Organization Science, 10: 519–534.
  • Loury, G. C., (1979). “Market Structure and Innovation”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93: 395–410 .
  • Markose, S. M., (2005). “Computability and Evolutionary Complexity: Market As Complex Adaptive Systems”, The Economic Journal, 115: F159–F192.
  • McAfee, R. P. ve McMillan, J., (1996). “Competition and Game Theory”, Journal of Marketing Research, 33: 263-267.
  • McNuty, P. J., (1968). “Economic theory and meaning of competition”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82: 639–652.
  • Mukoyama, T., (2003). “Innovation, imitation, and growth with cumulative technology”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 50: 361–380.
  • Normann, R., (1971). “Organizational Innovativeness: Product Variation and Reorientation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 16: 203–215.
  • Ottati, G. D., (1994). “Cooperation and competition in the industrial district as an organizastion model”, European Planning Studies, 2: 463–483.
  • Porter, M. E., (1998). “Clusters and New Economics of Competition”, Harvard Business Review, 77–90.
  • Rammel, C., (2003). “Sustainable development and innovations:lessons from the Red Queen”, International Journal of Sustainable Development, 6: 395–416.
  • Reynolds, L. G., (1940). “Cutthroat Competition”, The American Economic Review, 30: 736–747.
  • Robson,A. J., (2003). “The evolution of rationality and the Red Queen”, Journal of Economic Theory, 111: 1-22.
  • Segerstrom, P. S., (1991). “Innovation, Imitation, and Economic Growth”, The Journal of Political Economy, 99: 807–827.
  • Stalk, G., Evans, P. ve Schulman, L.E., (1992). “Competing on Capabilities:The New Rules of Corporate Strategy”, Harvard Business Review, 70(2):57–69.
  • Swaminathan , A., (1996). “Environmental Conditions at Founding and Organizational Mortality: A Trial-by-Fire Model”, The Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1350–1377.
  • Teece, D. J., (1992). “Competition, cooperation, and innovation”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 18: 1–25.
  • Telser, L. G., (1966). “Cutthroat Competition and the Long Purse”, Journal of Law and Economics, 9: 259–277.
  • van Valen, L., “A new evolutionary law”, Evolutionary Theory, 1 (1973), pp. 179–229
  • Vermeij, G. J., (1994), “The Evolutionary Interaction Among Species: Selection, Escalation, and Coevolution”, Annuale Review of Ecology and Systematic, Vol. 25, ss. 219–236.
  • Voelpel, S., Leibold, M., Tekie, E. ve Von Krogh, G., (2005). “Escaping the Red Queen Effect in Competitive Strategy: Sense-testing Business Models”, European Management Journal, 23: 37–49.
  • White, H. C., (1981). “Where Do Markets Come From?”, The American Journal of Sociology, 87: 517–547.
  • Auman, J. Robert ve Shapley, Lloyd S. (1994). “Long Term Competition-A Game Theoritic Analysis”, UCLA Economics Working Papers, http://www.econ.ucla.edu/workingpapers/wp676.pdf (28.08.2010).
  • Stevens, M., (1994). “A Theoretical Model of On-the-Job Training with Imperfect Competition”, Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 46: 537–562.
  • Vickers, J., (1995). “Consepts of Competition”, Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 47: 1–23

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 65 - 78, 01.12.2011

Oktay Koç Çağla Yavuz

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Barnett, W. P., (2008) The Red Queen among Organizations, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Burt, R. S., (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge, Massachusetts ve London: Harvard University Press.
  • Carroll, L.,(1960).The annotated Alice: Alice’s adventures in wonderland and through the looking glass, New York: New American Library.
  • OECD, (2005). Oslo Manual, Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data, Paris: OECD.
  • Schumpeter, J.A., (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Trott, P., (2005). Innovation Management and New Product Development, Third Edition, London: Prentice Hall.
  • Aghion, P., Haris, C., Howitt, P. ve Vickers, J., (2001). “Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step-by-Step Innovation”, The Review of Economic Studies, 68: 467–492.
  • Baumol, W. J., (2004). “Red-Queen Games: Arms Races, Rule of Law and Market Economies”, Journal of Evolutionary Economies, 14: 237–247.
  • Barkema, H. G., Baum, J. A.C., Mannix, E. A., (2002). “Management Challenges in a New Time”, Academy of Management Journal, 45: 916–930.
  • Barnett, W. P., and Hansen, M. T., (1996). “The Red Queen in Organizational Evolution”, Strategic Management Journal, 17: 139–157.
  • Barnett, W. P. and McKendrick, D. G., (2004). “Why Are Some Organizations More Competitive than Others? Evidence from a Changing Global Market”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 49: 535–571.
  • Barnett, W. P., and Pontikes, E. G., (2008). “The Red Queen, Success Bias, and Organizational Inertia”, Management Science, 54: 1237–1251.
  • Barnett, W. P., and Freeman, J., (2001). “Too Much of a Good Thing? Product Proliferation and Organizational Failure”, Organization Science, 12: 539–558.
  • Barney, J. B. ve Zajac, E. J., (1994). “Competitive Organizational Behavior: Toward an Organizationally - Based Theory of Competitive Advantage”, Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue: Competitive Organizational Behavior, 15: 5–9.
  • Christensen, C. M. ve Bower, J. L., (1996). “Customer Power, Strategic Investment, and the Failure of Leading Firms”, Strategic Management Journal, 17: 197–218.
  • Cliff, D. ve Miller, G. F., (1995). “Tracking The Red Queen: Measurements of adaptive progress in co-evolutionary simulations”, Advances in Artificial Life, 929: 200-218.
  • Derfus, P. J., Maggitti, P. G., Grimm, C. ve Smith, K. G., (2008). “The Red Queen Effect: Competitive Actions and Firm Performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 51: 61–80.
  • Dosi,G., (1988). “Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation”, Journal of Economic Literature, 26: 1120–1171.
  • Ebner, M., (2006). “Coevolution and the Red Queen effect shape virtual plants”, Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 7: 103–123.
  • Ebner, M., Grigore, A., Heffner, A. ve Albert, J., (2002). “Coevolution produces an arm races among virtual plants”, Genetic Programming, 2278: 114-170.
  • Glazebrook, J. F. ve ve Wallace, R., (2009) “Small worlds and Red Queens in the Global Workspace: An information-theoretic approach”, Cognitive Systems Research, 10(4): 1–33.
  • Kerin, R. A., Varadarajan, P. R. ve Peterson, R. A., (1992). “First-Mover Advantage: A Synthesis, Conceptual Framework, and Research Propositions”, The Journal of Marketing, 56: 33–52.
  • Kothandaraman P., ve Wilson, D. T., (2001). “The Future of Competition”, Industrial Marketing Management, 30: 379–389.
  • Lewin, A. Y. ve Volberda, H. W., (1999). “Prolegomena on Coevolution: A Framework for Research on Strategy and New Organizational Forms”, Organization Science, 10: 519–534.
  • Loury, G. C., (1979). “Market Structure and Innovation”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93: 395–410 .
  • Markose, S. M., (2005). “Computability and Evolutionary Complexity: Market As Complex Adaptive Systems”, The Economic Journal, 115: F159–F192.
  • McAfee, R. P. ve McMillan, J., (1996). “Competition and Game Theory”, Journal of Marketing Research, 33: 263-267.
  • McNuty, P. J., (1968). “Economic theory and meaning of competition”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82: 639–652.
  • Mukoyama, T., (2003). “Innovation, imitation, and growth with cumulative technology”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 50: 361–380.
  • Normann, R., (1971). “Organizational Innovativeness: Product Variation and Reorientation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 16: 203–215.
  • Ottati, G. D., (1994). “Cooperation and competition in the industrial district as an organizastion model”, European Planning Studies, 2: 463–483.
  • Porter, M. E., (1998). “Clusters and New Economics of Competition”, Harvard Business Review, 77–90.
  • Rammel, C., (2003). “Sustainable development and innovations:lessons from the Red Queen”, International Journal of Sustainable Development, 6: 395–416.
  • Reynolds, L. G., (1940). “Cutthroat Competition”, The American Economic Review, 30: 736–747.
  • Robson,A. J., (2003). “The evolution of rationality and the Red Queen”, Journal of Economic Theory, 111: 1-22.
  • Segerstrom, P. S., (1991). “Innovation, Imitation, and Economic Growth”, The Journal of Political Economy, 99: 807–827.
  • Stalk, G., Evans, P. ve Schulman, L.E., (1992). “Competing on Capabilities:The New Rules of Corporate Strategy”, Harvard Business Review, 70(2):57–69.
  • Swaminathan , A., (1996). “Environmental Conditions at Founding and Organizational Mortality: A Trial-by-Fire Model”, The Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1350–1377.
  • Teece, D. J., (1992). “Competition, cooperation, and innovation”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 18: 1–25.
  • Telser, L. G., (1966). “Cutthroat Competition and the Long Purse”, Journal of Law and Economics, 9: 259–277.
  • van Valen, L., “A new evolutionary law”, Evolutionary Theory, 1 (1973), pp. 179–229
  • Vermeij, G. J., (1994), “The Evolutionary Interaction Among Species: Selection, Escalation, and Coevolution”, Annuale Review of Ecology and Systematic, Vol. 25, ss. 219–236.
  • Voelpel, S., Leibold, M., Tekie, E. ve Von Krogh, G., (2005). “Escaping the Red Queen Effect in Competitive Strategy: Sense-testing Business Models”, European Management Journal, 23: 37–49.
  • White, H. C., (1981). “Where Do Markets Come From?”, The American Journal of Sociology, 87: 517–547.
  • Auman, J. Robert ve Shapley, Lloyd S. (1994). “Long Term Competition-A Game Theoritic Analysis”, UCLA Economics Working Papers, http://www.econ.ucla.edu/workingpapers/wp676.pdf (28.08.2010).
  • Stevens, M., (1994). “A Theoretical Model of On-the-Job Training with Imperfect Competition”, Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 46: 537–562.
  • Vickers, J., (1995). “Consepts of Competition”, Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 47: 1–23
Toplam 47 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Oktay Koç Bu kişi benim

Çağla Yavuz Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Aralık 2011
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2011 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Koç, O., & Yavuz, Ç. (2011). İnovasyon ve Rekabet Açısından Kızıl Kraliçe Etkisi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), 65-78.
AMA Koç O, Yavuz Ç. İnovasyon ve Rekabet Açısından Kızıl Kraliçe Etkisi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. Aralık 2011;1(2):65-78.
Chicago Koç, Oktay, ve Çağla Yavuz. “İnovasyon Ve Rekabet Açısından Kızıl Kraliçe Etkisi”. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 1, sy. 2 (Aralık 2011): 65-78.
EndNote Koç O, Yavuz Ç (01 Aralık 2011) İnovasyon ve Rekabet Açısından Kızıl Kraliçe Etkisi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 1 2 65–78.
IEEE O. Koç ve Ç. Yavuz, “İnovasyon ve Rekabet Açısından Kızıl Kraliçe Etkisi”, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 1, sy. 2, ss. 65–78, 2011.
ISNAD Koç, Oktay - Yavuz, Çağla. “İnovasyon Ve Rekabet Açısından Kızıl Kraliçe Etkisi”. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 1/2 (Aralık 2011), 65-78.
JAMA Koç O, Yavuz Ç. İnovasyon ve Rekabet Açısından Kızıl Kraliçe Etkisi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2011;1:65–78.
MLA Koç, Oktay ve Çağla Yavuz. “İnovasyon Ve Rekabet Açısından Kızıl Kraliçe Etkisi”. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 1, sy. 2, 2011, ss. 65-78.
Vancouver Koç O, Yavuz Ç. İnovasyon ve Rekabet Açısından Kızıl Kraliçe Etkisi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2011;1(2):65-78.