BibTex RIS Cite

Teachers’ and School Administrators’ Views of Parent Involvement in Education Process

Year 2010, Volume: 3 Issue: 3, 399 - 431, 01.04.2010

Abstract

Background. Research has shown that there is a correlation between student academic achievement and the qualities of parents and social surroundings (Shaw, 2008). A study by Epstein and Sheldon (2002b) suggested that parent involvement decreases student absenteeism. Number of other studies concluded that parent involvement positively affects student academic achievement (Jeynes, 2007; Shaw, 2008; Sheldon, 2003). Epstein (1995) categorized parent involvement in education process as relation to parenting, communication, volunteering, learning at home, decision making, and collaborating with community. Despite widely documented positive effects of parental involvement on students' learning and development, lack of parent involvement is a major problem in most schools. Weak parent involvement may be due to following factors: parents do not value parent involvement (Crites, 2008), parents leave education to schools and do not take responsibilities (Christenson, 2004; McGhee, 2007), educators have negative attitudes towards parents and do not believe parent involvement is essential (Shannon, 1996; Christenson, 2004), lack of communication between schools and parents (Cristenson, 2004; Crites, 2008). Purpose. The purpose of this study is to determine the views of teachers and school administrators about parent involvement in education process. The study attempts to define parent involvement levels, hindering factors of parent involvement, and parent involvement activities in schools by views of primary school teachers and administrators. Method. The study was conducted through interviews. The study group consists of 10 teachers and 10 school administrators at public primary schools in Ankara. Data was collected using the semi-structured interviews. A semi-structured interview form with eight questions was developed for teachers and school administrators. The interviews lasted 25 to 35 minutes and were tape-recorded. The findings were presented through descriptive analysis. Results and discussion. Results indicated that teachers and school administrators agreed that parent involvement in education process was essential. However, it is observed that schools do not take initiatives to improve parent involvement. Many teachers and school administrators reportedly favor of parent involvement, but do not take any action or responsibility for involving parents in students' education. They claim that they neither have sufficient parent involvement activities nor time for such activities. Educators generally consider these must-do (but never done) activities as their incompetence and believe that they need to adjust the case. Teachers and school administrators complain about parents' unawareness of parent involvement in education process. However, teachers and administrators reportedly feel disturbed since some parents infer with their profession and apply pressure for the things to do, thus teachers and school administrators take a dim view of parent involvement in education. It is known that parent visits to schools are frequent for lower grades, but rare at higher grades with the exception that further education prospects and school selection decisions increase communication during final years at primary schools. Parent involvement is mostly limited with activities such as parent visits to schools, information exchange, and advice from teachers, and attendance at meetings on request. In such practices, parents are generally passive and they are asked to follow advice and guidance from teachers. In this case, it might be suggested that educators do not fully internalize the view that parents should have the right to say about their child's education and they should be involved in decision making. Teachers and administrators perceive that most parents are reluctant and non-communicative to involve in education process; preferring to remain inactive, hesitating to express views when they are asked for their opinions, and leaving responsibilities to teachers and schools. Similar research findings show that these hindering factors do not largely differ from country to country. However, in some studies, working conditions (McGhee, 2007; Crites, 2008) and lingual and cultural differences (Shannon, 1996; Christenson, 2004) turned out to be hindering factors in parent involvement, but according to the results of the present study these factors are not really impeding. For educators, getting parents involved in the process or showing interest in parents as well as pupils means extra time and efforts. What prevents educators from such practices might be unwillingness to spent more time and extra effort for parent involvement. Teachers and administrators do not want parents to interfere with their work and therefore tends keep parents away from involvement in school. As reported by teachers and administrators, both school staff and parents should explore means of effective parent involvement.

References

  • Arslan, Ü. ve Nural, E. (2004). Okul öncesi eğitiminde okul-aile iş birliğinin önemi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 162, 99-108.
  • Aslanargun, E. (2007). Okul - aile işbirliği ve öğrenci başarısı üzerine bir tarama çalışma. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18, 119-135.
  • Aydın, İ. (2005). Okul çevre ilişkileri. İçinde, Y. Özden (Ed.). Eğitim ve okul yöneticiliği el kitabı. (ss. 161-185). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Aziz, A. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri ve teknikleri. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Balkar, B. (2009). Okul-aile işbirliği sürecine ilişkin veli ve öğretmen görüşleri üzerine nitel bir Çalışma. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36, 105-123.
  • Barge, J. K., & Loges, W. E. (2003). Parent, student, and teacher perceptions of parental involvement. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31(2), 140-163.
  • Carrasquillo, A. L., & London, C. B. G. (1993). Parents and schools: A source book. Garland Publishing Inc.
  • Cassity, J., & Harris, S. (2000). Parents of ESL students: A study of parental involvement. NASSP Bulletin, 84(55).
  • Christenson, S. L. (2004). The family-school partnership: An opportunity to promote the learning competence of all students. School Psychology Review. 33(1).
  • Coulombe, G. (1995). Parental involvement: A key to successful schools. NASSP Bulletin, 79, 71-75.
  • Crites, C. V. (2008). Parent and community involvement: A case study. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Wilmington University, Deleware.
  • Çelenk, S. (2003). Okul başarısının ön koşulu: Okul aile dayanışması. İlköğretim-Online, 2(2), 28-34, E-Dergi, http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr.
  • Epstein, J. L. (1995). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(9).
  • Epstein, J. L., & Sheldon, S. B. (2002a). Improving student behavior and school discipline with family and community involvement. Education And Urban Society, 35(4).
  • Epstein, J. L., & Sheldon, S. B. (2002b). Present and accounted for: Improving student attendance through family and community involvement. Journal of Educational Research, 95(5).
  • Finders, M., & Cyntia, L. (1994). Why some parents don't come to school. Educational Leadership, 51(8).
  • Hester, H. (1989). Start at home to improve home-school relations. NASSP Bulletin, 73(513), 23-27.
  • Jeynes, W. H. (2007). The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement: A meta- analysis. Urban Education, 42(82).
  • Lawson, M. A. (2003). School-family relations in context: parent and teacher perceptions of parent involvement. Urban Education, 38, 77-133.
  • McGhee, C. (2007). A descriptive study of teacher and parental attitudes towards parent involvement at an elementary school in deleware. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Wilmington University, Deleware.
  • Meriam, S. B. (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass Pfeiffer.
  • Ömeroğlu, E., & Yaşar, M. C. (2005). Okul öncesi eğitim kurumlarında ailenin eğitime katılımı. Bilim ve Aklın Aydınlığında Eğitim Dergisi, 62.
  • Rogers, M. A., Theule, J., Ryan, B.A., Adams, G. R., & Keating, L. (2009). Parental involvement and children’s school achievement. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 24(1), 34-57.
  • Shannon, S. M. (1996). Minority parental involvement: A mexican mother's experience and a teacher's interpretation. Education and Urban Society, 29(71).
  • Shaw, C. A. (2008). A study of the relationship of parental involvement to student achievement in a Pennsylvania career and technology center. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University. Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Sheldon, S. B. (2003). Linking school-family-community partnerships in urban elementary school to student achievement on state tests. The Urban Review, 35(2).
  • Şahin, F. T., & Ünver, N. (2005). Okul öncesi eğitim programlarına aile katılımı. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 13(1), 23-30.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Walberg, H. J. (2004). International perspectives on families, schools, and communities: Educational implications for family–school–community partnerships. Educational Research, 41, 3–9.

Ailelerin Eğitim Sürecine Katılımına İlişkin Öğretmen ve Yönetici Görüşleri

Year 2010, Volume: 3 Issue: 3, 399 - 431, 01.04.2010

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı, öğretmen ve yöneticilerin, ailelerin eğitim sürecine katılımına ilişkin görüşlerinin belirlenmesidir. Araştırma nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden görüşme yöntemiyle gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubu, Ankara'daki kamu ilköğretim okullarında görev yapan 10 öğretmen ile 10 yöneticiden oluşmuştur. Veriler yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme yöntemi ile toplanmıştır. Bulgular, betimsel analiz yaklaşımı ile sunulmuştur. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre öğretmen ve yöneticilerin ailelerin eğitim sürecine katılımının gereği konusunda hemfikir olduğu, ancak çoğunun uygulamada aynı hassasiyeti gösteremediği anlaşılmaktadır. Ailelerin çoğunun eğitim sürecine katılım konusunda isteksiz ve pasif olduğu görülmektedir. Katılım ise çoğunlukla ailenin okula gelip bilgi alışverişi yapması, öğretmenlerin tavsiyelerini alması, çağrıldığında toplantılara katılması gibi etkinliklerle sınırlıdır. Ailelerin sürece katılımının engelleri arasında ilk başta ailelerin ve eğitimcilerin olumsuz tavırları yer almaktadır. Okullarda aile katılımını engelleyen etkenlerin giderilmesine veya katılımı artırmaya yönelik çalışmaların yeterince yapılmadığı anlaşılmaktadır.

References

  • Arslan, Ü. ve Nural, E. (2004). Okul öncesi eğitiminde okul-aile iş birliğinin önemi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 162, 99-108.
  • Aslanargun, E. (2007). Okul - aile işbirliği ve öğrenci başarısı üzerine bir tarama çalışma. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18, 119-135.
  • Aydın, İ. (2005). Okul çevre ilişkileri. İçinde, Y. Özden (Ed.). Eğitim ve okul yöneticiliği el kitabı. (ss. 161-185). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Aziz, A. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri ve teknikleri. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Balkar, B. (2009). Okul-aile işbirliği sürecine ilişkin veli ve öğretmen görüşleri üzerine nitel bir Çalışma. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36, 105-123.
  • Barge, J. K., & Loges, W. E. (2003). Parent, student, and teacher perceptions of parental involvement. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31(2), 140-163.
  • Carrasquillo, A. L., & London, C. B. G. (1993). Parents and schools: A source book. Garland Publishing Inc.
  • Cassity, J., & Harris, S. (2000). Parents of ESL students: A study of parental involvement. NASSP Bulletin, 84(55).
  • Christenson, S. L. (2004). The family-school partnership: An opportunity to promote the learning competence of all students. School Psychology Review. 33(1).
  • Coulombe, G. (1995). Parental involvement: A key to successful schools. NASSP Bulletin, 79, 71-75.
  • Crites, C. V. (2008). Parent and community involvement: A case study. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Wilmington University, Deleware.
  • Çelenk, S. (2003). Okul başarısının ön koşulu: Okul aile dayanışması. İlköğretim-Online, 2(2), 28-34, E-Dergi, http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr.
  • Epstein, J. L. (1995). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(9).
  • Epstein, J. L., & Sheldon, S. B. (2002a). Improving student behavior and school discipline with family and community involvement. Education And Urban Society, 35(4).
  • Epstein, J. L., & Sheldon, S. B. (2002b). Present and accounted for: Improving student attendance through family and community involvement. Journal of Educational Research, 95(5).
  • Finders, M., & Cyntia, L. (1994). Why some parents don't come to school. Educational Leadership, 51(8).
  • Hester, H. (1989). Start at home to improve home-school relations. NASSP Bulletin, 73(513), 23-27.
  • Jeynes, W. H. (2007). The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement: A meta- analysis. Urban Education, 42(82).
  • Lawson, M. A. (2003). School-family relations in context: parent and teacher perceptions of parent involvement. Urban Education, 38, 77-133.
  • McGhee, C. (2007). A descriptive study of teacher and parental attitudes towards parent involvement at an elementary school in deleware. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Wilmington University, Deleware.
  • Meriam, S. B. (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass Pfeiffer.
  • Ömeroğlu, E., & Yaşar, M. C. (2005). Okul öncesi eğitim kurumlarında ailenin eğitime katılımı. Bilim ve Aklın Aydınlığında Eğitim Dergisi, 62.
  • Rogers, M. A., Theule, J., Ryan, B.A., Adams, G. R., & Keating, L. (2009). Parental involvement and children’s school achievement. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 24(1), 34-57.
  • Shannon, S. M. (1996). Minority parental involvement: A mexican mother's experience and a teacher's interpretation. Education and Urban Society, 29(71).
  • Shaw, C. A. (2008). A study of the relationship of parental involvement to student achievement in a Pennsylvania career and technology center. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University. Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Sheldon, S. B. (2003). Linking school-family-community partnerships in urban elementary school to student achievement on state tests. The Urban Review, 35(2).
  • Şahin, F. T., & Ünver, N. (2005). Okul öncesi eğitim programlarına aile katılımı. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 13(1), 23-30.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Walberg, H. J. (2004). International perspectives on families, schools, and communities: Educational implications for family–school–community partnerships. Educational Research, 41, 3–9.
There are 29 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Çetin Erdoğan This is me

Nihan Demirkasımoğlu This is me

Publication Date April 1, 2010
Published in Issue Year 2010 Volume: 3 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Erdoğan, Ç., & Demirkasımoğlu, N. (2010). Ailelerin Eğitim Sürecine Katılımına İlişkin Öğretmen ve Yönetici Görüşleri. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 3(3), 399-431.
AMA Erdoğan Ç, Demirkasımoğlu N. Ailelerin Eğitim Sürecine Katılımına İlişkin Öğretmen ve Yönetici Görüşleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi. April 2010;3(3):399-431.
Chicago Erdoğan, Çetin, and Nihan Demirkasımoğlu. “Ailelerin Eğitim Sürecine Katılımına İlişkin Öğretmen Ve Yönetici Görüşleri”. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi 3, no. 3 (April 2010): 399-431.
EndNote Erdoğan Ç, Demirkasımoğlu N (April 1, 2010) Ailelerin Eğitim Sürecine Katılımına İlişkin Öğretmen ve Yönetici Görüşleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi 3 3 399–431.
IEEE Ç. Erdoğan and N. Demirkasımoğlu, “Ailelerin Eğitim Sürecine Katılımına İlişkin Öğretmen ve Yönetici Görüşleri”, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 399–431, 2010.
ISNAD Erdoğan, Çetin - Demirkasımoğlu, Nihan. “Ailelerin Eğitim Sürecine Katılımına İlişkin Öğretmen Ve Yönetici Görüşleri”. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi 3/3 (April 2010), 399-431.
JAMA Erdoğan Ç, Demirkasımoğlu N. Ailelerin Eğitim Sürecine Katılımına İlişkin Öğretmen ve Yönetici Görüşleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi. 2010;3:399–431.
MLA Erdoğan, Çetin and Nihan Demirkasımoğlu. “Ailelerin Eğitim Sürecine Katılımına İlişkin Öğretmen Ve Yönetici Görüşleri”. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, vol. 3, no. 3, 2010, pp. 399-31.
Vancouver Erdoğan Ç, Demirkasımoğlu N. Ailelerin Eğitim Sürecine Katılımına İlişkin Öğretmen ve Yönetici Görüşleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi. 2010;3(3):399-431.