Sütçü Manda, İnek ve Koyunlarda Yaygın Olarak Kullanılan Kaba ve Konsantre Yemlerin İn-Vitro Sindirilebilirliğinin Daisy İnkübatör Kullanılarak Karşılaştırılması

Abstract

Bu araştırmada, manda, inek ve koyunlarda in vitro sistem kullanılarak 8 farklı yem maddesinin in vitro gerçek (NDF) sindirilebilirliği değerlendirilmiştir. Yemler, kaba ve konsantre olarak gruplandırıldı ve manda, sığır ve koyun rumen sıvıları kullanılarak test edildi. Araştırmada, tüm yemler için, üç tekerrür, üç farklı inokulum kaynağı (rumen sıvısı) kullanıldı. Sindirilebilirlik için inkubasyon süresi her tür rumen sıvısı için 48 saatti. Araştırmada, farklı hayvanlara ait rumen sıvılarının, 48 saatlik inkubasyon süresi boyunca yem maddelerinin in vitro gerçek? kuru madde sindirilebilirliği üzerinde önemli bir etkisi olmamıştır (P>0.05). Pelet buğday kepeği, sindirilebilirlik değeri açısından, diğer yem maddelerine göre koyunlarda en düşük değeri vermiştir. Sonuç olarak, in vitro sindirilebilirlik deneme yönteminin, farklı hayvan türlerinde yemlerin gerçek sindirilebilirliğini tahmin etmek için kullanılabileceği kanısına varılmıştır.

Keywords

• DAISY
• yem
• ruminant
• kuru madde
• sindirilebilirlik

Comparison of İn-Vitro Digestibility of Commonly Used Forage and Concentrate Feeds in Dairy Buffalo, Cow and Sheep by Using Daisy Incubator

Abstract

In this study was evaluated in-vitro true dry matter (DM) digestibility of 8 different feedstuffs by using in vitro system. Eight different feeds were grouped as roughage and concentrate and tested by using Buffalo, cow and sheep inoculums.. The experiment was replicated on three different timelines for all feeds and the three inoculum sources. The incubation time for the digestibility was 48 hours for each species inoculum. In the study, rumen fluids from different animals did not have a significant effect on the in vitro true? dry matter (DM) digestibility of different feedstuffs during the 48-hour incubation period (P>0.05). The pellet wheat bran showed the lowest mean value in sheep among all feedstuffs. It was concluded that the daisy incubator method could be used to predict the true digestibility of different feedstuffs in different species animals.

Keywords

• DAISY
• feed
• Concentrate
• ruminants
• dry matter
• digestibility

References

1. Ajila, C. M., Brar, S. K., Verma, M., Tyagi, R. D., Godbout, S., & Valéro, J. R. (2012). Bio-processing of agro-byproducts to animal feed. Crit Rev Biotechnol, 32(4), 382-400. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2012.659172
2. Allen, M. S., & Piantoni, P. (2014). Carbohydrate nutrition: managing energy intake and partitioning through lactation. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract, 30(3), 577-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2014.07.004
3. Besle, J.-M., Cornu, A., & Jouany, J.-P. (1994). Roles of structural phenylpropanoids in forage cell wall digestion. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 64(2), 171-190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740640206
4. Cone, J. W., Cliné-Theil, W., Malestein, A., & van 't Klooster, A. T. (1989). Degradation of starch by incubation with rumen fluid. A comparison of different starch sources. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 49(2), 173-183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740490206
5. Conrad, H. R., Pratt, A. D., & Hibbs, J. W. (1964). Regulation of Feed Intake in Dairy Cows. I. Change in Importance of Physical and Physiological Factors with Increasing Digestibility1. Journal of Dairy Science, 47(1), 54-62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(64)88581-7
6. Cotanch, K. W., Grant, R. J., Van Amburgh, M., Zontini, A. M., Fustini, M., Palmonari, A., & Formigoni, A. (2014). Applications of uNDF in ration modeling and formulation. 114-131.
7. Devendra, C., & Sevilla, C. C. (2002). Availability and use of feed resources in crop–animal systems in Asia. Agricultural Systems, 71(1), 59-73.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00036-1
8. Fox, D. G., Tedeschi, L. O., Tylutki, T. P., Russell, J. B., Van Amburgh, M. E., Chase, L. E., Pell, A. N., & Overton, T. R. (2004). The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 112(1), 29-78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.10.006

9. Getachew, G., Blümmel, M., Makkar, H. P. S., & Becker, K. (1998). In vitro gas measuring techniques for assessment of nutritional quality of feeds: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 72(3), 261-281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00189-2
10. Hogan, J. P., & Flinn, P. C. (1999). An assessment by in vivo methods of grain quality for ruminants. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/2272
11. Holden, L. A. (1999). Comparison of methods of in vitro dry matter digestibility for ten feeds. J Dairy Sci, 82(8), 1791-1794. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75409-3
12. Huhtanen, P., Nousiainen, J., & Rinne, M. (2006). Recent developments in forage evaluation with special reference to practical applications. Agricultural and Food Science, 15(3), 293-323. https://doi.org/10.2137/145960606779216317
13. Kendall, C., Leonardi, C., Hoffman, P. C., & Combs, D. K. (2009). Intake and milk production of cows fed diets that differed in dietary neutral detergent fiber and neutral detergent fiber digestibility. J Dairy Sci, 92(1), 313-323. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1482
14. Krizsan, S. J., & Huhtanen, P. (2013). Effect of diet composition and incubation time on feed indigestible neutral detergent fiber concentration in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, 96(3), 1715-1726. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5752
15. Mabjeesh, S. J., Cohen, M., & Arieli, A. (2000). In Vitro Methods for Measuring the Dry Matter Digestibility of Ruminant Feedstuffs: Comparison of Methods and Inoculum Source. Journal of Dairy Science, 83(10), 2289-2294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75115-0
16. Michalet-Doreau, B., & Ould-Bah, M. Y. (1992). In vitro and in sacco methods for the estimation of dietary nitrogen degradability in the rumen: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 40(1), 57-86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(92)90112-J
17. Nocek, J. E. (1988). In situ and Other Methods to Estimate Ruminal Protein and Energy Digestibility: A Review. Journal of Dairy Science, 71(8), 2051-2069. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79781-7
18. Nousiainen, J., Ahvenjärvi, S., Rinne, M., Hellämäki, M., & Huhtanen, P. (2004). Prediction of indigestible cell wall fraction of grass silage by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 115(3), 295-311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.03.004
19. Odum, H., Odum, E., & Brown, M. (2018). Agricultural systems. In Environment and Society in Florida (pp. 243-252). https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203757222-26
20. Richards, C. J., Pedersen, J. F., Britton, R. A., Stock, R. A., & Krehbiel, C. R. (1995). In vitro starch disappearance procedure modifications. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 55(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00790-T
21. Rojas-Downing, M. M., Nejadhashemi, A. P., Harrigan, T., & Woznicki, S. A. (2017). Climate change and livestock: Impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. Climate Risk Management, 16, 145-163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2017.02.001
22. Tylutki, T. P., Fox, D. G., Durbal, V. M., Tedeschi, L. O., Russell, J. B., Van Amburgh, M. E., Overton, T. R., Chase, L. E., & Pell, A. N. (2008). Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System: A model for precision feeding of dairy cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 143(1), 174-202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.05.010
23. Van Amburgh, M. E., Collao-Saenz, E. A., Higgs, R. J., Ross, D. A., Recktenwald, E. B., Raffrenato, E., & Foskolos, A. (2015). The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System: Updates to the model and evaluation of version 6.5. Journal of Dairy Science, 98(9), 6361-6380.
24. Van Soest, P. J. (1994). Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant (2 ed.). Cornell University Press.
25. Vanzant, E. S., Cochran, R. C., & Titgemeyer, E. C. (1998). Standardization of in situ techniques for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. J Anim Sci, 76(10), 2717-2729. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.76102717x