Dermatophytes Isolated From Dogs and Cats Suspected Dermatophytoses in Istanbul, Turkey Within A 15-Year-Period: An Updated Report
Abstract
The present research was aimed to determine the
prevalence of dermatophytes isolated from symptomatic dogs and cats, within a
15-year-period, in the city of Istanbul, Turkey. Dermatological specimens were collected from
1504 dogs and 846 cats, which were presented clinical signs of ringworm. Direct
microscopy and mycological cultures were performed. The fungal growth rate was
detected at 8.2% and 22.8% from dogs and cats, respectively. Microsporum
canis was the most frequently
isolated species followed by Trichophyton
spp., M. gypseum, T. mentagrophytes, M. nanum, other Microsporum
spp. moreover T. tonsurans. The cats less than two-year age and more than
ten-year age showed a statistically significant higher isolation rate of
infection (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences
between the age of the dogs and the dermatophyte
isolation rate and between the gender of
the dogs and cats and the dermatophyte
isolation rate. As a conclusion, the data suggest an updated report on local epidemiology
and define potential etiologic agents.
References
- Brilhante RSN, Cavalcante CSP, Soares-Junior FA, Cordeiro RA, Sidrim JJC, Rocha MFG. High rate of Microsporum canis feline and canine dermatophytoses in Northeast Brazil: epidemiological and diagnostic features. Mycopathologia. 2003; 156: 303-308.
- Cafarchia C, Romito D, Sasanelli M, Lia R, Capelli G, Otranto D. The epidemiology of canine and feline dermatophyoses in southern Italy. Mycoses. 2004; 47: 508-513.
- de Hoog GS, Guarro J, Gené J, Figueras MJ. Atlas of Clinical Fungi, Second Edition, Washington, DC, USA. American Society for Microbiology, 2000.
- Debnath C, Mitra T, Kumar A, Samanta I. Detection of dermatophytes in healthy companion dogs and cats in eastern India. Iranian journal of veterinary research. 2016; 17(1): 20.
- Esch KJ, Peterson CA. Transmission and epidemiology of zoonotic protozoal diseases of companion animals. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2013; 26(1): 58-85.
- Faggi E, Saponetto N, Sagone M. Dermatophytes isoles dês carnivores domestiques à Florence (Italie); enquête épidémiologique. Bull Soc Fr Mycol Méd. 1987; 1: 297-302.
- Ilhan Z, Karaca M, Ekin IH, Solmaz H, Akkan HA, Tutuncu M. Detection of seasonal asymptomatic dermatophytes in Van cats. Braz J Microbiol. 2016; 47(1): 225-230.
- Iorio R, Cafarchia C, Capelli G, Fasciocco D, Otranto D, Giangaspero A. Dermatophytoses in cats and humans in central Italy: epidemiological aspects. Mycoses. 2007; 50: 491-495.
- Kanbe T, Suzuki Y, Kamiya A, Mochizuki T, Fujihiro M, Kikuchi A. PCR-based identification of common dermatophyte species using primer sets specific for the DNA topoisomerase II genes. J Dermatol Sci. 2003; 32: 151-161.
- Khosravi AR, Mahmoudi M. Dermatophytes isolated from domestic animals in Iran. Mycoses. 2003; 46: 222–225.
- Koneman EW, Roberts GD. Practical Laboratory Mycology. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1985. Dermatophyte identification schema.
- Mancianti F, Nardoni S, Cecchi S, Corazza M, Taccini F. Dermatophytes isolated from symptomatic dogs and cats in Tuscany, Italy during a 15-year-period. Mycopathologia. 2002; 156: 13–18.
- Mattei AS, Beber MA, Madrid IM. Dermatophytosis in Small Animals. SOJ Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014; 2(3): 1-6.
- Moriello KA, Coyner K, Paterson S, Mignon B. Diagnosis and treatment of dermatophytosis in dogs and cats. Clinical Consensus Guidelines of the World Association for Veterinary Dermatology. Vet Dermatol. 2017; 28(3): 266-268.
- Murmu S, Debnath C, Pramanik AK, Mitra T, Jana S, Dey S, Batabyal, K. Detection and characterization of zoonotic dermatophytes from dogs and cats in and around Kolkata. Vet World. 2015; 8(9): 1078.
- Nichita I, Marcu A. The Fungal Microbiota Isolated from Cats and Dogs. J Anim Sci Technol. 2010; 43: 411-414.
- Nweze EI. Dermatophytoses in domesticated animals. Rev. Inst. Med. Tro. 2011; 53(2): 95-99.
- Özdamar K. SPSS ile Biyoistatistik. Kaan kitabevi, Türkiye. 2003.
- Paterson S. Dermatophytosis: an update. Companion Anim. 2017; 22(5): 248-253.
- Pinter L, Jurak Z, Ukalovic M, Susic V. Epidemiological and clinical features of dermatophytoses in dogs and cats in Croatia between 1990 and 1998. Vet Arhiv. 1999; 69: 261-270.
- Proverbio D, Perego R, Spada E, Bagnagatti de Giorgi G, Della Pepa A, Ferro E. Survey of dermatophytes in stray cats with and without skin lesions in Northern Italy. Veterinary medicine international, 2014; 1-4.
- Seker E, Dogan N. Isolation of dermatophytes from dogs and cats with suspected dermatophytosis in Western Turkey. Prev Vet Med. 2011; 98: 46–51.
- Tel OY, Akan M. Kedi ve köpeklerden dermatofitlerin izolasyonu. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2008; 55: 167-171.
- Weese JS, Fulford M. editors. Companion Animal Zoonoses. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. pp. 278–279.
15-Yıllık Periyotta İstanbul Türkiye’de Dermatofitoz Şüpheli Köpek ve Kedilerden İzole Edilen Dermatofitler: Güncellenmiş Rapor
Abstract
Bu araştırma, İstanbul ilinde 15 yıllık bir süre
içinde semptomatik köpek ve kedilerden izole edilen dermatofitlerin
yaygınlığını belirlemeyi amaçlamıştır. Dermatolojik örnekler ringworm klinik
belirtileri gösteren 1504 köpek ve 846 kediden toplandı. Direkt mikroskopi ve
mikolojik kültürler yapıldı. Mantar üreme oranları, köpeklerde % 8.2 kedilerde
% 22.8 olarak saptandı. En sık izole edilen tür Microsporum canis idi. Bunu Trichophyton
spp., M. gypseum, T. mentagrophytes, M. nanum, diğer Microsporum spp.
ve T. tonsurans takip etti. İki
yaşından küçük ve on yaşından büyük kediler, istatistiksel olarak anlamlı
derecede yüksek bir etken izolasyon oranı gösterdi (p <0.05). Köpeklerin
yaşı ve dermatofit izolasyon oranları ile kedi ve köpeklerin cinsiyeti ve
dermatofit izolasyon oranları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark
bulunmadı. Sonuç olarak, veriler yerel epidemiyoloji üzerine güncel bir rapor
sunmakta ve olası etiyolojik ajanları tanımlamaktadır.
References
- Brilhante RSN, Cavalcante CSP, Soares-Junior FA, Cordeiro RA, Sidrim JJC, Rocha MFG. High rate of Microsporum canis feline and canine dermatophytoses in Northeast Brazil: epidemiological and diagnostic features. Mycopathologia. 2003; 156: 303-308.
- Cafarchia C, Romito D, Sasanelli M, Lia R, Capelli G, Otranto D. The epidemiology of canine and feline dermatophyoses in southern Italy. Mycoses. 2004; 47: 508-513.
- de Hoog GS, Guarro J, Gené J, Figueras MJ. Atlas of Clinical Fungi, Second Edition, Washington, DC, USA. American Society for Microbiology, 2000.
- Debnath C, Mitra T, Kumar A, Samanta I. Detection of dermatophytes in healthy companion dogs and cats in eastern India. Iranian journal of veterinary research. 2016; 17(1): 20.
- Esch KJ, Peterson CA. Transmission and epidemiology of zoonotic protozoal diseases of companion animals. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2013; 26(1): 58-85.
- Faggi E, Saponetto N, Sagone M. Dermatophytes isoles dês carnivores domestiques à Florence (Italie); enquête épidémiologique. Bull Soc Fr Mycol Méd. 1987; 1: 297-302.
- Ilhan Z, Karaca M, Ekin IH, Solmaz H, Akkan HA, Tutuncu M. Detection of seasonal asymptomatic dermatophytes in Van cats. Braz J Microbiol. 2016; 47(1): 225-230.
- Iorio R, Cafarchia C, Capelli G, Fasciocco D, Otranto D, Giangaspero A. Dermatophytoses in cats and humans in central Italy: epidemiological aspects. Mycoses. 2007; 50: 491-495.
- Kanbe T, Suzuki Y, Kamiya A, Mochizuki T, Fujihiro M, Kikuchi A. PCR-based identification of common dermatophyte species using primer sets specific for the DNA topoisomerase II genes. J Dermatol Sci. 2003; 32: 151-161.
- Khosravi AR, Mahmoudi M. Dermatophytes isolated from domestic animals in Iran. Mycoses. 2003; 46: 222–225.
- Koneman EW, Roberts GD. Practical Laboratory Mycology. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1985. Dermatophyte identification schema.
- Mancianti F, Nardoni S, Cecchi S, Corazza M, Taccini F. Dermatophytes isolated from symptomatic dogs and cats in Tuscany, Italy during a 15-year-period. Mycopathologia. 2002; 156: 13–18.
- Mattei AS, Beber MA, Madrid IM. Dermatophytosis in Small Animals. SOJ Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014; 2(3): 1-6.
- Moriello KA, Coyner K, Paterson S, Mignon B. Diagnosis and treatment of dermatophytosis in dogs and cats. Clinical Consensus Guidelines of the World Association for Veterinary Dermatology. Vet Dermatol. 2017; 28(3): 266-268.
- Murmu S, Debnath C, Pramanik AK, Mitra T, Jana S, Dey S, Batabyal, K. Detection and characterization of zoonotic dermatophytes from dogs and cats in and around Kolkata. Vet World. 2015; 8(9): 1078.
- Nichita I, Marcu A. The Fungal Microbiota Isolated from Cats and Dogs. J Anim Sci Technol. 2010; 43: 411-414.
- Nweze EI. Dermatophytoses in domesticated animals. Rev. Inst. Med. Tro. 2011; 53(2): 95-99.
- Özdamar K. SPSS ile Biyoistatistik. Kaan kitabevi, Türkiye. 2003.
- Paterson S. Dermatophytosis: an update. Companion Anim. 2017; 22(5): 248-253.
- Pinter L, Jurak Z, Ukalovic M, Susic V. Epidemiological and clinical features of dermatophytoses in dogs and cats in Croatia between 1990 and 1998. Vet Arhiv. 1999; 69: 261-270.
- Proverbio D, Perego R, Spada E, Bagnagatti de Giorgi G, Della Pepa A, Ferro E. Survey of dermatophytes in stray cats with and without skin lesions in Northern Italy. Veterinary medicine international, 2014; 1-4.
- Seker E, Dogan N. Isolation of dermatophytes from dogs and cats with suspected dermatophytosis in Western Turkey. Prev Vet Med. 2011; 98: 46–51.
- Tel OY, Akan M. Kedi ve köpeklerden dermatofitlerin izolasyonu. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2008; 55: 167-171.
- Weese JS, Fulford M. editors. Companion Animal Zoonoses. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. pp. 278–279.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Veterinary Surgery |
| Journal Section | RESEARCH ARTICLE |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 30, 2019 |
| Acceptance Date | March 25, 2019 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2019 |
Cite
Cited By
Isolation of Dermatophytes from Infected Stray Dogs in Selangor, Malaysia
Jurnal Berkala Epidemiologi
P.M Ridzuan
https://doi.org/10.20473/jbe.V9I22021.123-129