Bıldırcınlarda (Coturnix coturnix japonica) Anestezi için Propofol-Ketamine Kombinasyonunun İntravenöz ve İntraosseöz Uygulanmasının Karşılaştırılması

Year 2014, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 11 - 16, 23.07.2014

Sadık Yayla Nadide Kamiloğlu Alkan Kamiloğlu İsa Özaydın

https://doi.org/10.5578/kvj.7020

Cited By: 1

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to compare the use of intraosseous (IO) and intravenous (IV) propofol-ketamine combination on clinical and cardiorespiratory parameters. The experiment was carried out on twenty clinically healthy mature male quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Quails divided into two groups. The first group (n=10) received 10 mg/kg Propofol-30 mg/kg Ketamine IV and second group (n=10) received 10 mg/kg Propofol-30 mg/kg IO. Each quail were monitored for heart rate, respiratory rate, cloacal temperature and electrocardiography. While the duration time of anesthesia in IV group was significantly shorter than IO group (p<0.05), no significant differences were recorded as regard the onset of anaesthesia in two groups. There were no significant differences obtained in heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and cloacal temperature (CT) between groups in recorded time points during anesthesia. Intraosseous administration of propofol-ketamine combination was seen as an alternative route to intravenous way, for it was shown similar changes in both IV and IO group in terms of clinical and physiological parameters. Moreover, use of propofol-ketamine combination for induction and maintenance of anesthesia was safe and reliable anesthetic combination that can be effectively used for quails. ●●● Bıldırcınlarda (Coturnix coturnix japonica) Anestezi için PropofolKetamine Kombinasyonunun İntravenöz ve İntraosseöz Uygulanmasının Karşılaştırılması

Keywords

-

Comparision of Intravenous and Intraosseous Administration of Propofol-Ketamine Combination for Anesthesia in Quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica

Abstract

Bu çalışmada propofol-ketamin kombinasyonunun intravenöz (IV) ve intraosseal (IO) yolla uygulamasıyla klinik ve kardiyo-respiratorik parametreler üzerine olan etkileri karşılaştırılmıştır. Çalışma klinik olarak sağlıklı bulunan 20 adet erkek, olgun bıldırcın (Coturnix coturnix japonica) üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Bıldırcınlar iki gruba ayrılarak birinci gruba (n=10) 10 mg/kg Propofol-30 mg/kg Ketamin IV olarak uygulanırken ikinci gruba (n=10) ise 10 mg/kg Propofol-30 mg/kg Ketamin IO uygulandı. Her bir bıldırcın monitörize edilerek kalp atım sayısı (HR), solunum sayısı (RR), kloakal ısı (CT) ve elektrokardiyogramları (ECG) alınarak izlendi. Anestezi süresi IV grubunda IO gruptan önemli derecede daha kısa bulunurken (p<0.05), anestezinin başlangıç süresi açısından bir fark bulunmadı. Ayrıca gruplar arasında HR, RR, CT bakımından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark yoktu. Sonuç olarak propofolketamin kombinasyonunun IO yolla uygulanması IV yola bir alternatif olarak düşünülebilir. Çünkü klinik ve fizyolojik parametreler bakımından hem IV hem de IO gruptaki bulgular benzerlik gösterdi. Ayrıca, anesteziye giriş ve anestezi süresince propofol-ketamin kombinasyonu kullanımı kanatlı hayvanlar için bir model olarakdüşünülen bıldırcınlarda da etkin bir biçimde kullanılabilecek bir anestezik kombinasyonu olarak düşünülebilir.

Keywords

Bıldırcın İntraosseöz İntravenöz Ketamin Propofol

References

• Azizpour A, Hassani Y. Clinical evaluation of general anesthesia with a combination of ketamine HCl and Diazepem in pigeons. Agric J. 2012;7: 101-105.
• Brickman KR, Krupp K, Rega P, Alexander J, Guinness M. Typing and screening of blood from intraosseous access. Ann Emerg Med. 1992; 21: 414-417.
• David H, Shipp J. A randomized controllerd tria of ketamine/propofol versus propofol alone for emergency department procedural sedation. Ann Emerg Med. 2011; 57: 435-441.
• Durrani UF, Ashraf M, Khalid A. Comparative efficacy of detomidine and Detomidineketamine cocktail in quails. Pakistan Vet J. 2005; 25: 197-199.
• English MJ, Papenberg R, Farias E, Scott WAC, Hinchey J. Heat loss in an animal experimental model. J Trauma. 1991; 31: 36-38.
• Eyarefe OD, Oguntoye CO. A Randomized trial of low-dose ketamine and lignocaine infiltration for laparo-caecectomy in layer chickens. Int J Anim Veter Adv. 2012; 4: 252-255. Kamiloglu A, Atalan G, Kamiloglu NN.Comparison of intraosseous and intramuscular drug administration for induction of anaesthesia in domestic pigeons. Res Vet Sci. 2008; 85: 171-175.
• Langan JN, Ramsay EC, James TB, Juergen S. Cardiopulmonary and sedative effects of intramuscular medetomidine-ketamine and intravenous propofol in ostriches (Struthio camelus). JAMS. 2000; 14: 2-7.
• Machin KL, Caulket NA. Evaluation of isoflurane and propofol anesthesia for intraabdominal transmitter placement in nesting female canvasback ducks. J Wildl Dis. 2000; 36: 3243
• Mendes GM, Selmi AL.. Use of combination of propofol and fentanyl, alfentanil, or sufentanil for total intravenous anesthesia in cats. JAVMA. 2003; 223: 1608-1613.
• Miller SM, Mitchel MA, Heatley JJ, Wolf T, Lapuz F, Lafortune M, Smith JA. Clinical and cardiorespiratory effects of propofol in the spotted bamboo shark (Chylloscyllium plagiosum). J Zoo Wildl Med. 2005; 36: 6736
• Moore GP, Pace SA, Busby W. Comparison of intraosseous, intramuscular, and intravenous administration of succinylcholine. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1989; 5: 209-210.
• Morse Z, Sano K, Kanri T. Effect of a propofolketamine admixture in humans volunteers. Pac Health Dialog. 2003; 10: 51-54.
• Mortero RF, Clark LD, Tolan MM, Metz RJ, Tsueda K, Sheppard RA. The effects of small-dose ketamine on propofol sedation: respiration, postoperative mood, perception, cognition, and pain. Anesth Analg. 2001; 92: 1465-1469.
• Paul-Murphy JR, Brunson DB, Miletic VA. Technique for evaluating analgesia in conscious perching birds. Am J Vet Res. 1999 60: 121312
• Sakai K, Cho S, Fukusaki M, Shibata O, Sumikawa K. The effect of propofol with and without ketamine on human cerebral blood flow velocity and CO(2) response. Anesth Analg. 2000; 90: 377-382.
• Tobias JD, Ross AK. Intraosseous infusions: a review for the anesthesiologist with a focus on pediatric use. Anesth Analg. 2010; 110: 391-401.
• Tomatir E, Atalay H, Gurses E, Erbay H, Bozkurt P. Effects of low dose ketamine before induction on propofol anesthesia for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging. Paediatr Anaesth. 2004; 14: 845-850.
• Umar MA, Yamashita K, Kushiro T, Muir WW. Evaluation of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol or ketamine-medetomidine-propofol combination in horses. JAVMA. 2006; 288: 1221-1227.
• Valverde A, Bienzle D, Smith D, Dyson DH, Villiant AE. Intraosseous cannulation and drug administration for induction of anaesthesia in chickens. Vet Surg. 1993; 22: 240-244.
• Yayla S, Kilic E. The comparison of clinical, histopathological and some hemodynamic effects of spinal anesthesia applied in dogs through bupivacaine HCl and ropivacaine HCl in two different concentrations. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2010; 16: 835-840.
• Yayla S, Kacar C, Kaya D, Merhan O, Aksoy O, Kilic E, Kaya S. Clinical, biochemical and hemodynamic effects of the intrathecal ketamine for ovariohysterectomy in bitches. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy. 2012; 56: 299-303.