Erciyes Üniversitesi Kampüsündeki Kantin Çalışanlarının El Hijyen Durumlarının Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2020, Volume: 13 Issue: 1, 52 - 59, 31.03.2020

Onur Çatar Yeliz Yıldırım

https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.657619

Abstract

Gıda kaynaklı bakteriyel hastalıkların büyük bir çoğunluğunun gıda çalışanlarının yanlış uygulamalarından kaynaklandığı bilinmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Erciyes Üniversitesi kampüsünde bulunan kantinlerde çalışan personel ellerinde indikatör bakteri varlığının belirlenmesi ve personelin gıda güvenliği bilgilerinin değerlendirilmesidir. Bu amaçla toplam 23 kantinde gıda ile teması olan çalışanlarla görüşme yapılmış ve parmakları örneklenmiştir. Gıda güvenliği bilgileri; belirlenen anket soruları ve kontrol listeleriyle değerlendirilmiştir. Mikrobiyolojik analizler, konvansiyonel yöntemlerle yapılmış, el örnekleri Staphylococcus aureus (S. auerus), Enterobacteriaceae, total koliform ve Escherichia coli (E. coli) açısından incelenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, çalışan ellerinden alınan örneklerin %73,91’inde koliform grubu belirlenirken, bunlardan %40,47’sinin literatürlerde belirlenen hedef değerlerin (<2.5 kob/cm2) üzerinde koliform içeriği belirlenmiştir. E. coli, Enterobacteriaceae ve S. auerus ise incelenen örneklerin sırasıyla %56,52 ve %82,6 ve % 82,6’sında belirlenmiştir. Gıda güvenliği bilgi değerlendirme skoru genel olarak yüksek olmakla birlikte ortalama %72,17’lik bir değer elde edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak çalışanların gıda güvenliği bilgi değerlendirme sonuçları yüksek skorlar ortaya koymuş olmasına karşın, el örneklerindeki patojen kontaminasyon yüzdeleri yüksek bulunmuştur. Gıda çalışanlarına yönelik mevcut eğitim modelinin revize edilerek etkin bir şekilde uygulanması, sürekliliğinin sağlanması, eğitim etkinliğinin denetlenmesi ve gıda satış yerlerinde katı ve sürekli kontrol programlarının uygulanması gerektiği sonucuna varılmıştır.

Keywords

Erciyes Üniversitesi, Gıda çalışanı, Gıda güvenliği bilgisi, İndikatör bakteri, Kantinler

Hand Hygiene Profile of Food Handlers in Canteens of Erciyes University Campus

Abstract

Foodborne bacterial diseases still occur as a result of improper handling practices by foodhandlers. The aim of this study was to evaluate food safety knowledge of food handlers’ and to determine the presence of indicator bacteria on food handlers’ hands in canteens and cafes in Erciyes University Campus, Kayseri. Total of 23 food handlers’ were interviewed and their hands were sampled to determine the contamination. Food handlers' knowledge were evaluated by questionnaires and checklists. Conventional methods were followed for microbiological analyses. The presence of total coliforms, E. coli, Enterobacteriaceae and S. aureus were analyzed. Results indicated that coliforms were present in 73,91% of food handlers’ hands, compared to the literature suggesting a target value of ˂2,5 cfu/cm2, 40,47% exceeded the limit. E. coli, Enterobacteriaceae and S.aureus were present in 56,52%, 82,6 % and 82,6 % of handlers’ hands respectively. Food safety knowledge evaluation received high scores with mean score of 72,17%. In spite of the high scores on food safety knowledge, high numbers of hand samples were found to be contaminated with pathogens. It is needed to revise the current training model of food handlers’, to ensure sustained training, to track the effectiveness of training and to carry out stringent surveillance programs at point of food sale.

Keywords

Erciyes University, Food handler, Food safety knowledge, Indicator bacteria, Canteens

References

• Abdul Mutalib NA, Abdul Rashid MF, Mustafa S, Amin-Nordin S, Hamat RA, Osman M. Knowledge, attitude and practises regarding food hygiene and sanitation of food handlers in Kuala Pilah, Malaysia. Food Control. 2012; 27: 289-293.
• Angelillo IF, Viggiani NMA, Rizzo L, Bianco A. Food handlers and foodborne diseases: knowledge, attitudes, and reported behavior in Italy. J. Food Prot. 2000; 63(3):381-385.
• Barros MAF, Nero LA, Monteiro AA, Beloti V. Identification of main contamination points by hygiene indicator microorganisms in beef processing plants. Food Sci. Technol. 2007; 27(4): 856-862.
• Bas M, Ersun AS, Kıvanç G. The evaluation of food hygiene knowledge, attitudes, and practices of food handlers’ in food businesses in Turkey. Food Control. 2006; 17(4):317-322.
• Blood RM, Curtis GDW. Media for ‘total’ enterobacteriaceae, coliforms and Escherichia coli. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1995; 26(1):93-115.
• Bolton DJ, Meally A, Blair IS, McDowell DA, Cowan C. Food safety knowledge of head chefs and catering managers in Ireland. Food Control. 2008; 19(3):291-300.
• Burch NL, Sawyer CA. Food handling in convenience stores: the impact of personnel knowledge on facility sanitation. J. Environ. Health. 1991; 54(3):23-27.
• Cogan TA, Slader J, BloomWeld SF, Humphrey TJ. Achieving hygiene in the domestic kitchen: The efectiveness of commonly used cleaning procedures. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2002; 92:885-892.
• Collins JE. Impact of changing consumer lifestyles on the emergence/re-emergence of foodborne pathogens. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2001; 3(4):1-13.
• Çakıroglu FP, Uçar A. Employees’ perception of hygiene in the catering industry in Ankara, Turkey. Food Control. 2008; 19(1):9-15.
• De Boer E. Update on media for isolation of enterobacteriaceae from foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1998; 45(1):43-53.
• Domínguez C, Gómez I, Zumalacárregui J. Prevalence of SalmonellaandCampylobacter in retailchickenmeat in Spain. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2002; 72:165-168.
• European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). The Community Summary Report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in the European Union in 2008. The EFSA Journal. 2010; 8(1):1410-1496.
• FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration).Evoluation of risks related to microbiological contamination of redutiit food by food preparation workers and the effectiveness of intervations to minimize those risks. Food and Drug Administiration center for food safetiy and applied nutrition. 1999 USA.
• Gomes-Neves E, Cardoso CS, Araújo AC, Correia da Costa JM. Meat handlers training in Portugal: a survey on knowledge and practice. Food Control. 2011; 22(3-4):501-507.
• Jevsnik M, Hlebec V, Raspor P. Food safety knowledge and practices among food handlers in Slovenia. Food Control. 2008; 19(12):1107-1118.
• Jianu C, Chiş C. Study on the hygiene knowledge of food handlers working in small and medium-sized companies in western Romania. Food Control. 2012; 26:151-156.
• Juuma PA. Hand hygiene: simple and complex. IJID. 2005; 9:3-14.
• Ko, WH. Evaluating food safety perceptions and practices for agricultural food handler. Food Control. 2010; 21:450-455.
• Lues JFR, Van Tonder I. The occurrence of indicator bacteria on hands and aprons of food handlers in the delicatessen sections of a retail Group. Food Control. 2007; 18:326-332.
• Mortlock MP, Peters AC, Griffith CJ. A national survey of food hygiene training and qualification levels in the UK food industry. Int J Environ Health Res. 2000; 10(2):111-123.
• Rennie DM. Evaluation of food hygiene education. British Food Journal. 1994; 96(11): 20-25.
• Rippel B. Consumer knowledge about food safety revealed. Washington, DC. Consumer Alert. 2002.
• Seaman P. Food hygiene training: introducing the food hygiene training model. Food Control. 2010; 21(4):381-387.
• Taylor JH, Brown KL, Toivenen J, Holah JT. A microbiological evaluation of warm air hand drier swith respect to hand hygiene and the wash room environment. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000; 89: 910–919.
• Tokuç B, Ekuklu G, Berberoglu U, Bilge E, Dedeler H. Knowledge, attitudes and self-reported practice of food service staff regarding food hygiene in Edirne, Turkey. Food Control. 2009; 20(6):565-568.
• Travis HR. Training for seasonal food service operation. J. Environ. Health. 1986; 48:265-267.
• Walker E, Pritchard C, Forsythe S. Food handlers’ hygiene knowledge in small food businesses. Food Control. 2003; 14(5):339-343.
• Yapp C, Fairman R. Factors affecting food safety compliance with in small and medium-sized enterprises: implications for regulatory and enforcement strategies. Food Control. 2006; 17(1):42-51.