Assessing the Health-economic Crisis: The Case of Turkey
Abstract
With the transition to neoliberalism, health has tended to be less regarded as a social obligation and become instead an individual responsibility. Hence, the issue of healthcare has gained a “health-economic” character by increasingly integrating health systems into the existing economic situation and market dynamics. Introduced in the 2000s, the Health Transformation Program (HTP) represents such an approach in Turkey. This article reports on field research carried out in Istanbul into the consequences of the HTP through a survey focusing on healthcare facility preferences and perceptions of the most critical problems of the healthcare system. The survey was carried out in 2019 with 5002 participants aged 25-65 using the face-to-face technique and frequency and Pearson chi-square analyses to summarise the findings. The privatisation trend is shown by public-to-private comparisons of health expenditures, hospital beds and admissions to hospitals, while the shift toward private hospitals is mitigated by participant preferences for the public healthcare schema, which remains the central pillar of the system. This preference is mainly based on the economical services provided in public hospitals, while the shift to the private system is argued to be largely impelled by increased patient density in the public system resulting from the neoliberal logic of the HTP. In conclusion, the need for a new reform program that will invest in the public nature of the Turkish health system is identified and addressed.
Keywords
Health Transformation Program , healthcare policy , public provision of healthcare , Turkish health system , neoliberalism
References
- Aktan, B. and Bulut, C. (2008). Financial performance impacts of corporate entrepreneurship in emerging markets: a case of Turkey. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 12(8), 1530–2275.
- Alper, C. E. and Onis, Z. (2003). Financial globalization, the democratic deficit, and recurrent crises in emerging markets: The Turkish experience in the aftermath of capital account liberalization. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 39(3), 5–26. doi:10.1080/1540496x.2003.11052542
- Aykan, B. and Güvenç-Salgirli, S. (2015). Responsibilizing individuals, regulating health: Debating public spots, risk, and neoliberal governmentality in contemporary Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey, 53, 71–92. doi:10.1017/npt.2015.19
- Bektemur, G., Arıca, S. and Gençer, M. Z. (2018). Türkiye’de Aile Hekimliğinde Sevk Zinciri Nasıl Uygulanmalıdır? Ankara Medical Journal, 18(3), 256–266. doi:10.17098/amj.461442
- Belek, İ. (2016). Sağlığın Politik Ekonomisi: Sosyal Devletin Çöküşü. İstanbul: Yazılama Yayınevi.
- Bennett, S. (1991). The Mystique of Markets: Public and Private Health Care in Developing Countries. PHP Departmental Publication. London.
- Berkley, S., Bobadilla, J.-L., Hecht, R., Hill, K., Jamison, D. T., Murray, C. J. L., … Tan, J.-P. (1993). World development report 1993: investing in health. New York. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/468831468340807129/World-development-report-1993-investing-in-health from retrieved.
- Bijlmakers, L., Bassett, M. and Sanders, D. (1995). Health and Structural Adjustment in Rural and Urban Settings in Zimbabwe. P. Gibbon (Ed.), Structural Adjustment and the Working Poor in Zimbabwe: Studies on Labour, Women Informal Sector Workers and Health in (pp. 2015–282). Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute.
- Bogg, L., Dong, H., Wang, K., Cai, W. and Vinod, D. (1996). The cost of coverage: rural health insurance in China. Health policy and planning, 11(3), 238–52. doi:10.1093/heapol/11.3.238
- Bulut, S. and Uğurluoğlu, Ö. (2018). Aile hekimlerinin bakış açısı ile sevk zincirinin değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Aile Hekimliği Dergisi, 22(3), 118–132. doi:10.15511/tahd.18.00318
