Research Article

Ethnic Tensions and Global Response: Disentangling the Complexities of the Bosnian War

Volume: 8 Number: 1 January 29, 2024
EN

Ethnic Tensions and Global Response: Disentangling the Complexities of the Bosnian War

Abstract

This article critically examines the Bosnian War within the broader framework of international law, with a specific focus on understanding its role in managing ethnic conflicts. The aim is to analyze the effectiveness of international law in addressing the complex dynamics of ethnic strife, particularly in the context of post-Cold War Yugoslavia. The key hypothesis guiding this research posits that international legal mechanisms, while crucial, faced significant challenges and limitations in effectively resolving the ethnic conflicts that characterized the Bosnian War. The study delves into the historical and socio-political factors fueling ethnic tensions in Yugoslavia, highlighting how nationalism and ethnic separatism culminated in widespread violence. The article critically evaluates the international response to the conflict, including the effectiveness of UN Peacekeeping Forces and the Dayton Peace Agreement, and discusses the broader implications for global peace and security. Furthermore, the establishment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) is explored as a key development in international law. The study assesses the impact of the ICTY on promoting accountability and justice, and its role in facilitating reconciliation efforts post-conflict. The findings of this study have significant relevance for contemporary international law, offering insights into its potential in preventing and resolving ethnic conflicts in a rapidly changing global landscape.

Keywords

Bosnian War , ethnic conflicts , genocide , Yugoslavia , international law

References

  1. Adaş, S. & Konuralp, E. (2020a). Sırp Milliyetçiliği Fay Hattında Bosna-Hersek Siyasetinin Krizi. Barış Araştırmaları ve Çatışma Çözümleri Dergisi, 8(2), 102-126.
  2. Adaş, S., & Konuralp, E. (2020b). Eski Yugoslavya’da Sırp Milliyetçiliğinin Tarihsel Temelleri ve Yugoslavya Sosyalist Federal Cumhuriyeti'nin Dağılmasına Etkileri. Anadolu ve Balkan Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(6), 107-139.
  3. Akdemir, E. (2018). European Union Perception of Bosnia and Herzegovina's People. Balkan Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(1) , 1-30. DOI: 10.30903/Balkan.444557
  4. Anholt, R. M. (2016). Understanding sexual violence in armed conflict: cutting ourselves with Occam’s razor. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 1, 1-10.
  5. Bam, N., Shrestha, R., & Maharjan, R. K. (2020). Importance of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) Training in Armed Police Force, Nepal. Journal of APF Command and Staff College, 3(1), 106–119. DOI: 10.3126/japfcsc.v3i1.27532
  6. Bennett, C. (1995). Yugoslavia’s Bloody Collapse: Causes, Course and Consequences. New York University Press.
  7. Benson, S. A. (2020). Fragmentation or Coherence? Does international Dispute Settlement Achieve Comprehensive Justice?. International Journal of Law and Public Administration, 3(1), 77-88.
  8. Bilić, B. (2011). (Post-)Yugoslav anti-war engagement: A research topic awaiting attention. Filozofija I Drustvo, 22, 83-107.
  9. Bolton, M. & Jeffrey, A. (2008), The politics of NGO registration in international protectorates: the cases of Bosnia and Iraq. Disasters, 32, 586-608. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2008.01056.x
  10. Bulatović, S. (2019). The role of orthographic and phonetic distances in mutual intelligibility between Montenegrin and Bulgarian. Logos & Littera: Journal of Interdisciplinary Approaches to Text, 6(1), 49-66. DOI: 10.31902/LL.2019.6.1.3
APA
Igdır Akaras, A. (2024). Ethnic Tensions and Global Response: Disentangling the Complexities of the Bosnian War. Lectio Socialis, 8(1), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.47478/lectio.1378450