Artificial Intelligence as the Common: Cognitive Capitalism, Enclosure and the Crisis of Property

Aykut Aykutalp; Adem Çelik

doi:10.47478/lectio.1851570

Artificial Intelligence as the Common: Cognitive Capitalism, Enclosure and the Crisis of Property

Abstract

This study discusses the transformations that cause knowledge to become a source of power, wealth, and property in contemporary societies and the phenomenon of artificial intelligence, which is at the center of these transformations, in the context of cognitive capitalism and the theory of the commons. Cognitive capitalism, which has become dominant today, points to a new process of enclosure of knowledge and therefore of the commons. The rise of artificial intelligence and the transformation in the mode of knowledge-based production have made the problem of how to protect and control the sources of collective knowledge a current debate. In this context, this study addresses the process of enclosing and appropriating the commons through collective knowledge structures, intellectual creativity, user experiences, and datasets in the context of artificial intelligence. The enclosure of artificial commons such as knowledge, symbols, icons, and data resources reveals new forms of capitalism; this process makes visible the tension between the communal nature of the knowledge structures underlying artificial intelligence and the logic of private property. In this context, the article aims to discuss the question of whether artificial intelligence should be regulated within the undemocratic boundaries of private property or in line with collective participation and democratic principles appropriate to the nature of the commons.

Keywords

artificial intelligence , cognitive capitalism , the commons , intellectual property , neoliberalism

References

Adaman, F., Akbulut, B., & Kocagöz, U. (2017). Müşterekler: çatışkılar, hatlar, imkanlar. In F. Adaman, B. Akbulut, & U. Kocagöz (Eds.), Herkesin herkes için: müşterekler üzerine eleştirel bir antoloji (pp. 13-23). Metis Yayınları.
Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press.
Boldrin, M., & Levine, D. (2021). Reforming patent law: The case of Covid-19. Cato Journal, 41(3), 773-784.
Bollier, D. (2007). The growth of the commons paradigm. In C. Hess & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice (pp. 27-40). MIT Press.
Boyle, J. (2003). The second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66(33), 33-74.
Caffentzis, G., & Federici, S. (2014). Commons against and beyond capitalism. Community Development Journal, 49, i92-i105. [https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsu006](https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsu006)
Chaturvedi, A., & Vengattil, M. (2024). Indian news agency ANI sues OpenAI for unsanctioned content use in AI training. [https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/indian-news-agency-ani-sues-openai-unsanctioned-content-use-ai-training-2024-11-19/](https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/indian-news-agency-ani-sues-openai-unsanctioned-content-use-ai-training-2024-11-19/)
Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2012). Dünyanın yeni aklı: neoliberal toplum üzerine deneme (I. Ergüden, Trans.). İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2014). Common: On revolution in the 21st century. Bloomsbury Publishing.
De Angelis, M. (2001). Marx and primitive accumulation: The continuous character of capital’s “enclosures.” The commoner, 2, 1-22.

De Angelis, M. (2017). Omnia sunt communia: On the commons and the transformation to postcapitalism. Zed Books.
Field, H. (2024). OpenAI responds to New York Times lawsuit, says “regurgitation” of content is a “rare bug.”https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/08/openai-responds-to-new-york-times-lawsuit.html)
Frischmann, B. M., Madison, M. J., & Strandburg, K. J. (2014). Governing knowledge commons. In B. M. Frischmann, M. J. Madison, & K. J. Strandburg (Eds.), Governing knowledge commons (pp. 1-43). Oxford University Press.
Gorz, A. (2010). The immaterial: Knowledge, value, and capital. Seagull.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248.
Hardt, M. (2010). The common in communism. Rethinking Marxism, 22(3), 346-356. [https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2010.490365](https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2010.490365)
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Harvard University Press.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. Penguin Books.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Harvard University Press.
Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford University Press.
Harvey, D. (2004). The “New” imperialism: Accumulation by Dispossession. Socialist Register, 40, 63-87.
Harvey, D. (2006) Neo‐liberalism as creative destruction. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 88(2), 145-158. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2006.00211.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2006.00211.x)
Harvey, D. (2010). A companion to Marx’s Capital. Verso.
Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. Verso Books.
Heller, M. A. (1998). The tragedy of the anticommons: property in the transition from Marx to markets. Harvard Law Review, 111(3), 621-688.
Heller, M. A., & Eisenberg, R. S. (1998). Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science, 280(5364), 698-701.
Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2007). Introduction: An overview of the knowledge commons. In C. Hess, & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice. (pp. 3-26). MIT Press.
Jessop, B. (2007). Knowledge as a fictitious commodity: Insights and limits of a Polanyian perspective. In A. Bugra & K. Agartan (Eds.), Reading Karl Polanyi for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 115-133). Palgrave Macmillan.
Jones, J. (2025). Don’t fear artificial intelligence; question the business model: How surveillance capitalists use media to invade privacy, disrupt moral autonomy, and harm democracy. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 49(1), 6-26. [https://doi.org/10.1177/01968599241235209](https://doi.org/10.1177/01968599241235209)
Joyce, K., Smith-Doerr, L., Alegria, S., Bell, S., Cruz, T., Hoffman, S. G., Noble, S. U., & Shestakofsky, B. (2021). Toward a sociology of artificial intelligence: A call for research on inequalities and structural change. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023121999581
Lazzarato, M. (1996). Immaterial Labor. Generation Online.
Lebert, D., & Vercellone, C. (2015). Kapitalizmin uzun vadeli dinamiği içinde bilginin rolü: Bilişsel kapitalizm varsayımı. In C. Vercellone (Ed.), Bilişsel kapitalizm: Post-Fordist dönemde bilgi ve finans (pp. 17-39). Otonom Yayıncılık.
Lemley, M. A., & Casey, B. (2020). Fair learning. Texas Law Review, 99, 743-785. [http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3528447](http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3528447)
Linebaugh, P. (2008). The Magna Carta manifesto: Liberties and commons for all. University of California Press.
Macpherson, C. B. (Ed.). (1999). Property: Mainstream and critical positions. University of Toronto Press.
Makridis, C. A., & Ammons, J. D. (2025). Governing the large language model commons: Using digital assets to endow intellectual property rights. Journal of Institutional Economics, 21, 1-20. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137425000165](https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137425000165)
Marx, K. (2011). Kapital: Cilt I (M. Selik & N. Satlıgan, Trans.). Yordam Kitap.
Moulier-Boutang, Y. (2011). Cognitive capitalism. Polity Press.
Ostrom, E. (2015). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Özveren, E., & Gürpınar, E. (2024). More a commons than a fictitious commodity: Tacit knowledge, sharing, and cooperation in knowledge governance. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15, 3824-3843. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01159-2](https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01159-2)
Pınar, H. (2004). Uluslararası rekabette fikri mülkiyet haklarının önemi ve Türkiye. İTO Yayınları.
Roggero, G. (2009). Ortak olanın kurumları. Otonom Dergisi, 20, 51-60.
Roggero, G. (2011). The production of living knowledge: The crisis of the university and the transformation of labor in Europe and North America. Temple University Press.
Rousseau, J. J. (2010). İnsanlar arasındaki eşitsizliğin kaynağı (R. N. İleri, Trans.). Say Yayınları.
Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.
Virno, P. (2004). A grammar of the multitude: For an analysis of contemporary forms of life. Semiotext (e).
Vlasceanu, M., & Amodio, D. M. (2022). Propagation of societal gender inequality by internet search algorithms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(29), e2204529119. [https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2204529119](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2204529119)
Wallerstein, I. (2004). Dünya sistemleri analizi (E. Abadoğlu & N. Ersoy, Trans.). Aram Yayıncılık.
Walton, N., & Nayak, B. (2021). Rethinking of Marxist perspectives on big data, artificial intelligence (AI) and capitalist economic development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120576. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120576](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120576)
West, E. G. (2003). Property rights in the history of economic thought: From Locke to J.S. Mill. In T. L. Anderson & F. S. McChesney (Eds.), Property rights: Cooperation, conflict, and law (20-42). Princeton University Press.
Yüksel, M. (2001). Fikri mülkiyet hukukunun tarihsel temelleri. FMR Dergisi, 1, 89-108.
Zizek, S., & Daly, G. (2004). Conversations with Zizek. Polity Press.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Political Sociology , Sociology (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Aykut Aykutalp ^*
0000-0001-5991-0306
Türkiye

Adem Çelik
0000-0002-9297-1116
Türkiye

Publication Date

March 5, 2026

Submission Date

December 29, 2025

Acceptance Date

March 4, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Number: 2026

DOI

https://doi.org/10.47478/lectio.1851570

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA95YP98RF

APA

Aykutalp, A., & Çelik, A. (2026). Artificial Intelligence as the Common: Cognitive Capitalism, Enclosure and the Crisis of Property. Lectio Socialis, 2026. https://doi.org/10.47478/lectio.1851570

Lectio Socialis is a prestigious, international, peer-reviewed journal operating on a continuous publication model that provides a platform for scholars to share high-quality, policy-relevant research. The journal’s primary focus is political science, exclusively accepting original research and review articles. While centered on political inquiry, the journal also welcomes contributions from related fields such as public administration, international relations, and economics that offer significant insights into governance and power structures. The primary objective of Lectio Socialis is to maintain an independent and unbiased environment for global researchers to present transformative scholarship that addresses structural inequalities and contributes to the advancement of knowledge and social progress.

Lectio Socialis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artificial Intelligence as the Common: Cognitive Capitalism, Enclosure and the Crisis of Property

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite