Review
PDF EndNote BibTex RIS Cite

The Role of Economy in Right-wing Populism: Two Differing Approaches

Year 2022, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 135 - 142, 22.07.2022
https://doi.org/10.47478/lectio.1130471

Abstract

Populism has been one of the concepts that attract conflicting opinions from scholars. These debates revolve around many different aspects such as who votes for populist parties, what constitutes a populist leader, which institutional factors help populist parties come to power, and even on how populism should be defined. This conflicting opinion then matters for social scientists since differing opinions about the question of what populism is would then lead to different research and different results. This article analyzes the two different populism definitions: Populism as an ideology, and populism as a discursive style and shows how two definitions yield different results in explaining the economic nexus that drives populist parties. This article shows two seminal works on populism literature; Cas Mudde, and Norris and Inglehart have differing opinions on the economic reasoning behind populist parties solely because of the definitions they attribute to populism.

References

  • Aslanidis, P. (2016). Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective. Political Studies, 64(1), 88-104.
  • Hernández, E., & Kriesi, H. (2016). The electoral consequences of the financial and economic crisis in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 55(2), 203–224.
  • Moffitt, B., & Tormey, S. (2014). Rethinking populism: Politics, mediatisation and political style. Political Studies, 62(2), 381-397.
  • Mudde, C. (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe (1st ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2013). Populism. In M. Freeden, and M. Stears (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies (pp. 578-600). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. F. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have- nots and cultural backlash. Harvard Kennedy School, Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP16-026, August 2016.
  • Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. F. (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism (1st ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Stanley, B. (2008). The Thin Ideology of Populism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(1), 95-110.

Year 2022, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 135 - 142, 22.07.2022
https://doi.org/10.47478/lectio.1130471

Abstract

References

  • Aslanidis, P. (2016). Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective. Political Studies, 64(1), 88-104.
  • Hernández, E., & Kriesi, H. (2016). The electoral consequences of the financial and economic crisis in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 55(2), 203–224.
  • Moffitt, B., & Tormey, S. (2014). Rethinking populism: Politics, mediatisation and political style. Political Studies, 62(2), 381-397.
  • Mudde, C. (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe (1st ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2013). Populism. In M. Freeden, and M. Stears (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies (pp. 578-600). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. F. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have- nots and cultural backlash. Harvard Kennedy School, Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP16-026, August 2016.
  • Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. F. (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism (1st ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Stanley, B. (2008). The Thin Ideology of Populism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(1), 95-110.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Political Science, Sociology
Journal Section Review Articles
Authors

Melis KONAKÇI
Freie Universität Berlin
0000-0002-9714-8954
Germany

Early Pub Date July 21, 2022
Publication Date July 22, 2022
Submission Date June 14, 2022
Acceptance Date July 20, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 6 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Konakçı, M. (2022). The Role of Economy in Right-wing Populism: Two Differing Approaches . Lectio Socialis , 6 (2) , 135-142 . DOI: 10.47478/lectio.1130471

Lectio Socialis is an international peer-reviewed journal on social sciences, humanities and arts. The journal welcomes articles mainly from the disciplines of economics; political science; public administration; business administration; international relations; urban planning; sociology; psychology; linguistics; literature; history; jurisprudence; philosophy; archaeology; anthropology; comparative religion; ethics; the history, criticism and theory of the arts.

The major objective of Lectio Socialis is to maintain a vibrant and independent environment for scholars and researchers from different regions of the globe.


Creative Commons License
Lectio Socialis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.