Honor Killings in Traditional Societies: Revisiting the Case of Türkiye After Istanbul Convention Withdrawal

Year 2024, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 73 - 98, 31.07.2024

Mehtap Hamzaoğlu

https://doi.org/10.47478/lectio.1454452

Abstract

This research delves into the complex dynamics of honor and honor killings in traditional societies, with a specific focus on Türkiye, which has a Muslim-majority population and secular-democratic politico-legal system. It sheds light on the cultural and societal frameworks that reinforce honor, particularly in the context of gender relations and familial reputation. Using a qualitative methodology, the study analyzes the case of Türkiye, with a significant emphasis on the controversial withdrawal from the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence, also known as the Istanbul Convention. Examining discussions in the parliament, legal documents, and secondary sources, such as research reports, supports the case study. The findings reveal a complicated interplay between traditional perceptions of honor, legal inadequacies, and societal attitudes that perpetuate violence against women. The study argues that while legislative reforms have been implemented, cultural and societal norms continue to pose significant challenges to their effectiveness. The conclusion underscores the urgent need for a multifaceted approach, incorporating legal, educational, and societal strategies to dismantle the cultural norms that condone honor-related violence. This article contributes to the discourse on gender-based violence, advocating for a comprehensive understanding and action to address honor killings in Türkiye and beyond.

Keywords

honor, honor killings, women’s human rights, Istanbul Convetion, Türkiye

References

• Abu-Lughod, L. (2004). Peçeli duygular. Epsilon Yayıncılık.
• Acar-Savran, G. (2002). Özel/kamusal, yerel/evrensel: İkilikleri aşan bir feminizme doğru. Praksis, (8), 255–306.
• Acar-Savran, G. (2008). İkinci baskıya önsöz. In G. Acar-Savran & N. T. Demiryontan (Ed.), Kadının görünmeyen emeği (pp. 9–16). Yordam Kitap.
• Acar-Savran, G. (2018). Feminizm yazıları: Kuramdan politikaya. Dipnot Yayınları.
• Acar-Savran, G. & Demiryontan, N. T. (2008). Önsöz. In G. Acar-Savran & N. T. Demiryontan (Ed.), Kadının görünmeyen emeği (pp. 17–28). Yordam Kitap.
• Acar, F. & Altunok, G. (2013). The ‘politics of intimate’ at the intersection of neo-liberalism and neo-conservatism in contemporary Turkey. Women’s Studies International Forum, 41, 14–23.
• Acar, F., Göksel, A., Dedeoğlu-Atılgan, S., Altunok, G. & Gözdaşoğlu-Küçükalioğlu, E. (2007). Deliverable no. 19: Series of timelines of policy debates in selected topics: Turkey. QUING Project, Institute for Human Sciences (IWM).
• Akpınar, A. (2003). The honour/shame complex revisited: violence against women in the migration context. Women’s Studies International Forum, 26(5), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2003.08.001
• Aksoy, H. A. (2021). What lies behind Turkey’s withdrawal from the Istanbul Convention? Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP). https://www.swp-berlin.org/publikation/what-lies-behind-turkeys-withdrawal-from-the-istanbul-convention
• Al-Qahtani, S.M., Almutairi, D.S., BinAqeel, E.A., Almutairi, R.A., Al-Qahtani. R.D., Menezes, R.G. (2023). Honor killings in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: A narrative review. Healthcare, (11)74, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11010074
• Anadolu Agency. (2021). Bahçeli: Türkiye'nin İstanbul Sözleşmesi'nden çekilmesi hukuka uygundur. Anadolu Agency Website. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/politika/bahceli-turkiyenin-istanbul-sozlesmesinden-cekilmesi-hukuka-uygundur/2189369#
• Apaydin, D. T. (2022). Protecting Women from Violence in Turkey: The Contentious Decision to Withdrawing from Istanbul Convention. Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law Online, 21(1), 166-174.
• Aysan, S. & Yurdakul, G. (2001). Culture of honour, culture of change. A feminist analysis of honour killings in rural Turkey. Violence Against Women, 7(9), 964-998. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010122182866
• Baker, N. V., Gregware, P R., & Cassidy, M A. (1999). Family Killing Fields: Honor Rationales in the Murder of Women. Violence Against Women, 5(2), 164-184. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780129952005
• Bayar, T. (2024). Turkey’s withdrawal from Istanbul Convention: international human rights regime vis-à-vis authoritarian survival. Turkish Studies, 25(1), 22-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2023.2262721
• Beard, M. (2018). Kadın ve iktidar: Bir M-manifesto. Pegasus.
• Beauvoir, S. de. (1968). The second sex. Bantam.
• Bengisu, I. (2021). Turkey’s withdrawal from the Istanbul Convention: A step in the wrong direction. LSE Centre for Women, Peace and Security Forum. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/wps/2021/05/05/turkeys-withdrawal-from-the-istanbul-convention-a-step-in-the-wrong-direction/
• Berktay, F. (2015). Tarihin cinsiyeti. Metis Yayınları.
• Berns, S. (2005). Liberalism and the privatised family: The legacy of Rousseau. Res Publica, 11(2), 125-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-005-1476-5
• Berthet, V. (2022). Norm under fire: support for and opposition to the European Union’s ratification of the Istanbul Convention in the European Parliament. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 24(5), 675-698. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2022.2034510
• Cerami, C. (2021). Turkey, Europe and women’s rights: The controversial debate on the Istanbul Convention. Nuovi Autoritarismi e Democrazie: Diritto, Istituzioni, Società (NAD-DIS), 3(1). https://doi.org/10.13130/2612-6672/15644
• Clinton, K. B. (1975). Femme et philosophe: Enlightenment origins of feminism. Eighteenth-Century Studies, 8(3), 283-283. https://doi.org/10.2307/2737750
• Connell, R. W. (1998). Toplumsal cinsiyet ve iktidar: Toplum, kişi ve cinsel politika. Ayrıntı.
• Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities. University of California Press.
• Cooney, M. (2014). Death by family: Honor violence as punishment. Punishment & Society, 16(4), 406-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474514539537
• Council of Europe. (2023a). Historical background. Istanbul Convention: Action against violence against women and domestic violence. https://www.coe.int/en/web/istanbul-convention/historical-background
• Council of Europe. (2024b). Key facts about the Istanbul Convention. Istanbul Convention: Action against violence against women and domestic violence. https://www.coe.int/en/web/istanbul-convention/key-facts
• Çevik, A. (2020). İstanbul Sözleşmesi, İslam dünyasına yönelik bir tehdittir. Milli Gazete. https://www.milligazete.com.tr/makale/4340964/adem-cevik/istanbul-sozlesmesi-islam-dunyasina-yonelik-bir-tehdittir
• Davidoff, L. (2002). Feminist tarihyazımında sınıf ve cinsiyet. İletişim.
• Davidson, J. (2011). Bodymaps: Sexing space and zoning gender in Ancient Athens. Gender & History, 23(3), 597-614. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0424.2011.01659.x
• Doğan, R. (2014). Different Cultural Understandings of Honor That Inspire Killing. Homicide Studies, 18(4), 363-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767914526717
• Doğan, R. (2016). Namus, töre ve eril şiddet: Yargıtay kararları, toplumsal cinsiyet kuramları. Ütopya Yayınevi.
• Ecevit, Y. (2004). AB’ye Üyelik Sürecini Lehimize Çevirelim. Bianet. https://bianet.org/bianet/cevre/45922-abye-uyelik-surecini-lehimize-cevirelim
• Ecevitoğlu, P. (2012). Namus töre ve iktidar. Dipnot Yayınları.
• Elmas, T., Overdorf, R. & Aberer, K. (2021). Tactical reframing of online disinformation campaigns against the Istanbul Convention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.13398.
• Elshtain, J. B. (1981). Public man, private woman. Princeton University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691215952
• Engels, F. (1986). Ailenin, özel mülkiyetin ve devletin kökeni. Sol Yayınları.
• Erman, T. (1998). Becoming “urban” or remaining “rural”: The views of Turkish rural-to-urban migrants on the “integration” question. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 30(4), 541-561. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020743800052557
• Erman, T. (2001). Rural migrants and patriarchy in Turkish cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(1), 118-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00301
• Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society, 3(2), 193-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002004
• Faqir, F. (2001). Intrafamily femicide in defence of honour: the case of Jordan. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/713701138
• Fermon, N. (1994). Domesticating women, civilizing men: Rousseau’s political program. Sociological Quarterly, 35(3), 431-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1994.tb01737.x
• Fox‐Genovese, E., & Schwartz, J. (1985). The sexual politics of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. The American Historical Review, 90(3), 668-668. https://doi.org/10.2307/1860988
• Foxhall, L. (1989). Household, gender and property in classical Athens. The Classical Quarterly, 39(1), 22-44. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009838800040465
• Fraser, N. (1989). Unruly practices: Power, discourse, and gender in contemporary social theory. University of Minnesota Press.
• Grzyb, M. (2016). An explanation of honour-related killings of women in Europe through Bourdieu’s concept of symbolic violence and masculine domination. Current Sociology, 64, 1036-1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392115627479
• Hamzaoğlu, M. & Konuralp, E. (2018). Türk hukuk sisteminin ‘namus’la imtihanı: Ulusal mevzuat ve uluslararası düzenlemeler açısından namus cinayetleri. Marmara Üniversitesi Kadın ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 67–83.
• Hamzaoğlu, M. & Konuralp, E. (2019). Türkiye’de kadına karşı şiddetin sembolik ve doğrudan biçimleri: namus olgusu ve namus cinayetleri. Adli Tıp Bülteni, 24(3), 226-235.
• Hansson, M.G. (2008). The private sphere from a historical and cultural perspective. In The private sphere. philosophical studies in contemporary culture, Vol. 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6652-8_1
• Hellgren, Z. & Hobson, B. (2008). Cultural dialogues in the good society: The case of honour killings in Sweden. Ethnicities, 8(3), 385-404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796808092449
• Hunter, V. (1988). The origins of patriarchy: gender and class in the ancient world. Labour/Le Travailleur, 22, 239-246. https://doi.org/10.2307/25143044
• Ilyasoğlu, A. (1994). Örtülü kimlik: İslamcı kadın kimliğinin oluşum öğeleri. Metis Yayınları.
• International Federation for Human Rights. (2017). Tunisia votes landmark bill to end all violence against women. fidh.org. https://www.fidh.org/en/impacts/tunisia-votes-landmark-bill-to-end-all-violence-against-women
• Joachim, J. (2018). Women’s rights as human rights. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.430
• Kandiyoti, D. & Kandiyoti, D. (1987). Emancipated but unliberated? Reflections on the Turkish case. Feminist Studies, 13(2), 317-317. https://doi.org/10.2307/3177804
• Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2(3), 274-290. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912438800200300
• Kaplan, H. (2020a). Ailenin kaderi bir sözleşmeden öte. Sabah. https://www.sabah.com.tr/yazarlar/hilalkaplan/2020/05/02/ailenin-kaderi-bir-sozlesmeden-ote
• Kaplan, H. (2020a). Feminizm ve eşcinsellik: Aileyi tahribin başlangıç noktası. Sabah. https://www.sabah.com.tr/yazarlar/hilalkaplan/2020/05/01/feminizm-ve-escinsellik-aileyi-tahribinbaslangicnoktasi
• Kemahlı Garipoğlu, F. & Sezer Şanlı, A. (2021). Muhafazakâr ve feminist ideolojiler bağlaminda Istanbul Sözleşmesi tartişmalarina yönelik bir eleştirel söylem analizi. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim, 16(35), 125-188.
• Keyhani, N. (2013). Honour crimes as gender-based violence in the UK: A critical assessment. UCL Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 2(1), 255-277. 10.14324/111.2052-1871.010
• Kiener, R. (2011). Honor Killings: Can Murders of Women and Girls Be Stopped? CQ Press.
• KONDA. (2020). Ağustos 2020 Barometresi. KONDA Araştırma ve Danışmanlık Website. https://konda.com.tr/rapor/11/istanbul-sozlesmesi
• KONDA. (2021). İnsan hakları araştırması. KONDA Araştırma ve Danışmanlık Website. https://konda.com.tr/rapor/5/insan-haklari-arastirmasi
• KONDA. (2022). Gençlerin insan hakları algısı araştırması. KONDA Araştırma ve Danışmanlık Website. https://konda.com.tr/rapor/174/genclerin-insan-haklari-algisi-arastirmasi
• Konuralp, E. (2016). Transformation of secularism in Turkey: Debating post-secularism under the AKP-rule. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. METU.
• Konuralp, E. (2018). Kimliğin etni ve ulus arasında salınımı: Çokkültürcülük mü yeniden kabilecilik mi? Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 13(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.400350
• Krisjanous, J., Allayarova, N., & Kadirov, D. (2022). Clothing of righteousness: exploring tensions of halal maternity wear on online apparel websites. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 13(5), 1125-1142. https://doi.org/10.1108/jima-03-2020-0080.
• Mackinnon, C. A. (2015). Feminist bir devlet kuramına doğru. Metis Yayınları.
• Meetoo, V. & Mirza, H. S. (2010). “There is nothing ‘honourable’about honour killings”: Gender, violence and the limits of multiculturalism. In Idriss, M. M. & Abbas, T. (Eds.), Honour, violence, women and Islam (pp. 50-74). Routledge-Cavendish.
• Mill, J. S. (2017). Kadınların köleleştirilmesi. Bilge Kültür Sanat.
• Morgan, L. H. (2015). Eski toplum. İnkilap Kitabevi.
• Morsink, J. (1999). The universal declaration of human rights. University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812200416
• National Assembly of France. (2008). Declaration of the rights of man – 1789. Lillian Goldman Law Library. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/rightsof.asp
• Okin, S. M. (1998). Feminism, women’s human rights, and cultural differences. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 13(2), 32-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01224.x
• Özgün, Y. (2012). Feminizm. In G. Atılgan & E. A. Aytekin (Eds.), Siyaset bilimi: Kavramlar,ideolojiler,disiplinler arası ilişkiler (pp. 347–361). Yordam Kitap.
• Özdil, M. A. (2021a). Osmanlı millet sisteminden Türk ulusuna giyim ve kimlik. Hiperyayın.
• Özdil, M. A. (2021b). The effect of clothing as a marker on identity. Motif Akademi Halkbilimi Dergisi, 14(33), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.12981/mahder.867867
• Pirim, C. Z. (2022). The Legal Effects of the New Presidential System on Turkey’s Treaty-Making Practice. European Journal of International Law, 33(2), 579-606.
• Reich, W. (1995). Cinsel ahlakın boygöstermesi. Payel Yayınevi.
• Rogers, B. (2005). The domestication of women: Discrimination in developing societies. Routledge.
• Rose, S. D. (1999). Christian fundamentalism: Patriarchy, sexuality, and human rights. In Religious fundamentalisms and the human rights of women (pp. 9-20). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107380_2
• Schmitz, M. (2004). Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. In Philosophen (pp. 204-210). J.B. Metzler eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-02949-2_48
• Schnaiberg, A. (1970). Rural-urban residence and modernism: A study of Ankara Province, Turkey. Demography, 7(1), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.2307/2060024
• Sehlikoglu, S. (2016). Exercising in Comfort: Islamicate Culture of Mahremiyet in Everyday Istanbul. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 12, 143-165. https://doi.org/10.1215/15525864-3507606.
• Sen, P. (2005). Crimes of honour, value and meaning. . In Welchman, L. and Hossain, S. (eds), ‘Honour’: Crimes, paradigms, and violence against women (pp. 42-63). Zed Books.
• Simuziya, N. J. (2021). Universal human rights vs cultural & religious variations: An African perspective. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 8(1), 1988385.
• Tahincioğlu, A. N. Y. (2011). Namusun halleri. Postiga Yayınları.
• Tezcan, M. (2003). Türkiye’de töre (namus) cinayetleri: Sosyo-kültürel antropolojik yaklaşım. Naturel Yayıncılık.
• Thrasher, J. & Handfield, T. (2018). Honor and violence: an account of feuds, duels, and honor killings. Human Nature, 29, 371-389. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3057147
• Tillion, G. (2006). Harem ve kuzenler. Metis Yayınları.
• Tinker, C. (1981). Human rights for women: The U. N. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. Human Rights Quarterly, 3(2), 32-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/761855
• Trigger, B. G. (2003). Family organization and gender roles. In Understanding early civilizations: A comparative study (pp. 167–194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511840630.011
• Türközü, D. (2021). Turkey’s withdrawal from the Istanbul Convention: One step further, two steps back: Völkerrechtliche Tagesthemen 13. Völkerrechtsblog. https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/turkeys-withdrawal-from-the-istanbul-convention-one-step-forward-two-steps-back/
• UKEssays. (2021). Cultural Relativism versus Universalism. UKEssays.com. https://www.ukessays.com/essays/human-rights/the-issue-of-cultural-relativism-human-rights-essay.php?vref=1
• United Nations. (n. d.). Preamble to the United Nations universal declaration of human rights. United Nations Website. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265930040020
• Walby, S. (1989). Theorising patriarchy. Sociology, 23(2), 213-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038589023002004
• Warrington, M. & Younger, M. (2011). Life is a tightrope: Reflections on peer group inclusion and exclusion amongst adolescent girls and boys. Gender and Education, 23(2), 153-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540251003674121
• We Will Stop Femicides Platform. (2024). We Will Stop Femicides Platform 2023 Annual Report. We Will Stop Femicides Platform Website. https://kadincinayetlerinidurduracagiz.net/veriler/3089/we-will-stop-femicides-platform-2023-annual-reportn
• Welchman, L. & Hossain, S. (2005a). ‘Honour’, rights and wrongs. In Welchman, L. and Hossain, S. (eds), ‘Honour’: Crimes, paradigms, and violence against women (pp. 1-21). Zed Books.
• Welchman, L. & Hossain, S. (2005b). Naming the crime:‘Honour’, rights and wrongs. Review of Women’s Studies, 3, 67-78.
• Yeni Akit. (2020). Abdurrahman Dilipak'tan dikkat çeken sözler: Bu "Zulüm 1453 de başladı" diyenlerin rövanşıdır. Yeni Akit. https://www.yeniakit.com.tr/haber/abdurrahman-dilipaktan-dikkat-ceken-sozler-bu-zulum-1453-de-basladi-diyenlerin-rovansidir-1225009.html
• Yetkin, M. (2020). İşte Erdoğan’dan fesih isteyen İstanbul Sözleşmesi raporu. Yetkin Report. https://yetkinreport.com/2020/07/23/iste-erdogandan-fesih-isteyen-istanbul-sozlesmesi-raporu/
• Yuval-Davis, N. (1997a). Gender and nation. SAGE Publishing.
• Yuval-Davis, N. (1997b). Women, citizenship and difference. Feminist Review, 57(1), 4-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/014177897339632