BibTex RIS Cite

CONCILIATIVE NEED FOR HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIVIST CLAIMS IN RELATION TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS

Year 2015, , 1 - 16, 29.10.2016
https://doi.org/10.20978/ijlp.45253

Abstract

The meanings, the values and the limits changes from culture to culture. But as the international law becomes more responsive to the demands for rights of individual, this initiative also means a challenge to the validity of certain state practices re¬flecting geographical and cultural particularities.

CONCILIATIVE NEED FOR HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIVIST CLAIMS IN RELATION TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS

Year 2015, , 1 - 16, 29.10.2016
https://doi.org/10.20978/ijlp.45253

Abstract

The meanings, the values and the limits changes from culture to culture. But as the international law becomes more responsive to the demands for rights of individual, this initiative also means a challenge to the validity of certain state practices re¬flecting geographical and cultural particularities.

In this paper, it will be tried to observe basic claims of both universality and relativism, after that what preventions can be taken to provide the misuse of relativism will be suggested, in the manner of reconciling both ways of thinking in an acceptable order while emphasizing on preventing the core of human rights.

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Muhammed Çaprak

Publication Date October 29, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2015

Cite

APA Çaprak, M. (2016). CONCILIATIVE NEED FOR HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIVIST CLAIMS IN RELATION TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS. International Journal of Legal Progress, 1(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.20978/ijlp.45253
AMA Çaprak M. CONCILIATIVE NEED FOR HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIVIST CLAIMS IN RELATION TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS. International Journal of Legal Progress. July 2016;1(2):1-16. doi:10.20978/ijlp.45253
Chicago Çaprak, Muhammed. “CONCILIATIVE NEED FOR HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIVIST CLAIMS IN RELATION TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS”. International Journal of Legal Progress 1, no. 2 (July 2016): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.20978/ijlp.45253.
EndNote Çaprak M (July 1, 2016) CONCILIATIVE NEED FOR HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIVIST CLAIMS IN RELATION TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS. International Journal of Legal Progress 1 2 1–16.
IEEE M. Çaprak, “CONCILIATIVE NEED FOR HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIVIST CLAIMS IN RELATION TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS”, International Journal of Legal Progress, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–16, 2016, doi: 10.20978/ijlp.45253.
ISNAD Çaprak, Muhammed. “CONCILIATIVE NEED FOR HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIVIST CLAIMS IN RELATION TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS”. International Journal of Legal Progress 1/2 (July 2016), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.20978/ijlp.45253.
JAMA Çaprak M. CONCILIATIVE NEED FOR HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIVIST CLAIMS IN RELATION TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS. International Journal of Legal Progress. 2016;1:1–16.
MLA Çaprak, Muhammed. “CONCILIATIVE NEED FOR HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIVIST CLAIMS IN RELATION TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS”. International Journal of Legal Progress, vol. 1, no. 2, 2016, pp. 1-16, doi:10.20978/ijlp.45253.
Vancouver Çaprak M. CONCILIATIVE NEED FOR HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIVIST CLAIMS IN RELATION TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS. International Journal of Legal Progress. 2016;1(2):1-16.