Evaluating a task-based lesson plan: A case study of Turkish EFL learners

Year 2024, Volume: 10 Issue: 3, 309 - 338, 31.12.2024

Vildan İnci Kavak

https://doi.org/10.47216/literacytrek.1489532

Abstract

The world has seen a rise in the demand for foreign language instruction in recent years, and traditional textbook-based teaching strategies are unlikely to satisfy the demands of today’s students. As a result, the interest in the Task-Based Language Teaching (TBL) approach has increased. This article describes and assesses a newly created, task-based English course that will be incorporated into the curricula. The lesson was designed, pilot-tested and revised before being introduced. This study investigates students’ reactions to a task-based EFL lesson at a Turkish state university. Thirty-two Turkish preparatory students (20 female and 12 male) participated in the study. Learner impressions were investigated through oral and written data elicited through a questionnaire, semi-structured interviews, and audio recordings of the interaction in the task. The data analysis shows that despite initial hesitations, a TBL lesson brings variety into the EFL classroom; learners prefer learner-directed lessons with more opportunities to express themselves. They also confessed that their academic needs were sufficiently met and felt more independent. The study provides a model TBL lesson for educators to benefit from and inspires them to design their lesson programmes by integrating task-based activities. These results validate the potential of TBL for language learning. Thus, it should be considered an indelible part of EFL syllabi and courses.

Keywords

Task-based language teaching, lesson plan, learner reactions, classroom practice, task-based activities

Ethical Statement

This research study was conducted with the Research Ethics Committee approval of Gaziantep Islam, Science and Technology University, dated 03.04.202 and numbered 240000697.

References

• Albino, G. (2017). Improving speaking fluency in a task-based language teaching approach: The case of EFL learners at PUNIV-Cazenga. SAGE Open, 7(2).
• Alderson, J. C. (1992). Evaluating second language education. Cambridge University Press.
• Al Kamli, H. M., & Almalki, M. S. (2024). Learning-oriented assessment (LOA) implementation in EFL tertiary contexts: Towards a more task-based learning (TBL) environment. World Journal of English Language, 14(1), 1-8.
• Almanza Molina, A. L. (2024). Gamification: A tool to improve speaking skill through the TBL approach [Undergraduate thesis]. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, Facultad de Humanidades, Departamento de Lenguas, Bogotá D.C.
• Alvarado, K. A. M., Solórzano, S. J. C., & Arroyo, P. A. A. (2023). Task-based learning in efl teaching: teachers’ perspectives. Revista Científica Arbitrada Multidisciplinaria Pentaciencias, 5(5), 53-65.
• Bachman, L. F. (2002). Some reflections on task-based language performance assessment. Language Testing, 19(4), 453-476.
• Byrnes, H. (2002). The role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate foreign language curriculum. Language Testing, 19(4), 419–437.
• Byrnes, H., Crane, C., H. Maxim, H., & Sprang, K. A. (2006). Taking text to task: Issues and choices in curriculum construction. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 152(1), 85-109.
• Carless, D. (2012). TBLT in EFL settings. In A. Shehadeh & C. A. Coombe (Eds.), Task-Based Language Teaching in Foreign Language Contexts, (pp. 345-358). John Benjamins.
• Chen, C. (2018). The research on the relationship between task-based language teaching and listening motivation of English majors. In 2017 7th International Conference on Education and Management (ICEM 2017). Atlantis Press.
• Chen-Jun, W. (2006). Designing communicative tasks for college English courses. [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Chongqing Normal University & Yangtze Normal University, China.
• Chen, S., & Wang, J. (2019). Effects of task-based language teaching (TBLT) approach and language assessment on students’ competences in intensive reading course. English Language Teaching, 12(3), 119-138.
• Cohen, I. & Manion, L. (1980). Research methods in education. Routledge.
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
• Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Simon and Schuster.
• Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language teaching and learning. Oxford University Press.
• Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2002). Doing focus-on-form. System, 30(4), 419-432.
• Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83-107.
• Ellis, R. (2003). Designing a task-based syllabus. RELC Journal, 34(1), 64–81.
• Ellis, R. (2021). Options in a task-based language-teaching curriculum: An educational perspective. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 11–46.https://doi.org/10.1075/task.00002.ell
• Ellis, R. (2018). Reflections on Task-Based Language Teaching. Multilingual Matters.
• Ellis, R. (2009). Task‐based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221–246.
• Ellis, R. (2024). Task-based and task-supported language teaching. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 6(4), 1-8.
• Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
• Erlam, R. (2016). ‘I’m still not sure what a task is’: Teachers designing language tasks. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 279-299.
• Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied linguistics, 19(1), 1-23.
• Frost, R. (2004). A task-based approach. Teaching English. British Council. Available at http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/think/methodology/task_based.shtml
• Gibbs, G. (1995). The society for research into higher education. Open University Press.
• Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. Pearson Longman.
• Hişmanoğlu, M. (2011). An investigation of ELT students’ intercultural communicative competence in relation to linguistic proficiency, overseas experience and formal instruction. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(6), 805-817.
• Ismaili, M. (2012). The effectiveness of the task-based learning in developing students’ speaking skills in academic settings in the EFL classroom: A study conducted at South East European University (SEEU). 1st Albania International Conference on Education (AICE), 291–299.
• Ki, W. W. (2000). ICT applications in TBL. In N. Law et al., Changing classrooms & changing schools: A study of good practices in using ICT in Hong Kong schools (pp. 79–91). Friendship Printing.
• Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1993). How languages are learned. Oxford University Press.
• Littlewood, W. (2014). Methodology for teaching ESP. In V. K. Bhatia & S. Bremner (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and professional communication (pp. 287–303). Routledge.
• Long, M. (2014). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
• Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1993). Comments on Michael H. Long and Graham Crookes’s "Three approaches to task-based syllabus design": The authors respond. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 729–733.
• Long, M., & Norris, J. (2000). Task-based teaching and assessment. In M. Byram (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language teaching (pp. 597–603). Routledge
• McDonough, K., & Chaikitmongkol, W. (2007). Teachers’ and learners’ reactions to a task‐based EFL course in Thailand. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 107-132.
• McDonough, K. (2015). Perceived benefits and challenges with the use of collaborative tasks in EFL contexts. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT (pp. 225–246). John Benjamins
• Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. (2002). Design and analysis in task-based language assessment. Language Testing, 19(4), 477-496.
• Munn, P., & Drever, E. (1990). Using questionnaires in small-scale research. A teacher’s guide. The Scottish Council for Research in Education.
• Norris, J.M. (2009). Task-based teaching and testing. In M.H. Long & C.J. Doughty (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 578-594). Wiley.
• Norris, J. M., Brown, J. D., Hudson, T. D., Bonk, W. (2002). Examinee abilities and task difficulty in task-based second language performance assessment. Language Testing 19 (4), 395-418.
• Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge University Press.
• Nunan, D. (2015). Teaching English to speakers of other languages: An introduction. Routledge.
• Otake, M. (2016) The role of TBLT in promoting success in adult L2 learning. Journal of Foreign Language Education, 13(1), 1-20.
• Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communicative tasks for second language instruction. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9–34). Multilingual Matters.
• Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy (Vol. 20). Oxford University Press.
• Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
• Richards, J.C. & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
• Seedhouse, P. (1999). Task-based Interaction, ELT Journal, 53/3, 149-156.
• Shank, R. C., & Cleary, C. (1994). Engines for education. Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2010). The incidental acquisition of English plural–s by Japanese children in comprehension-based and production-based lessons: A process-product study. Studies in second language acquisition, 32(4), 607-637.
• Sholeh, M. B. (2023). Task-based learning in the classroom for EFL learners: How and why? Journal of Language and Pragmatics Studies, 2(3), 274-281.
• Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38–62.
• Solares, M. E. (2006). TBLT: Challenges and problems in an online course design for teacher development. Available at http://www.cteno.be/www_tblt/2005/download/solares.doc
• Swan, M. (2005). Legislation by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 376-401.
• Towell, R., & Tomlinson, P. (1999). Language curriculum development research at university level. Language Teaching Research, 3(1), 1-32.
• Van den Branden, K. (2016). Task-based language teaching. In G. Hall (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (pp. 238-251). Routledge.
• Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J. M. (Eds.). (2009). Task-based language teaching: A reader. John Benjamins.
• Van den Branden, K., Van Gorp, K., & Verhelst, M. (Eds.). (2009). Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
• Weir, C. & Roberts, J. (1994). Evaluation in ELT. Wiley Blackwell.
• Willis, D. & Willis, J. (2007). Doing Task-Based Teaching. Oxford University Press
• Willis, J. (1996). A Framework for TBL. Longman
• Willis, J., & Willis, D. (2013). Doing task-based teaching- Oxford Handbooks For Language Teachers. Oxford University Press.
• Zhaochun, S. (2015). A tentative study on the task-based teaching of writing to English majors in Chinese settings. English Language Teaching, 8(3), 71-79.
• Zhao, Y., & Ellis, R. (2022). The relative effects of implicit and explicit corrective feedback on the acquisition of 3rd person-s by Chinese university students: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research, 26(3), 361-381.