Baş Boyun bölgesi dermatitli kedilerde korneometrik analizlerle deri hidrasyonunun ölçümü:

Year 2019, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 1 - 7, 30.06.2019

Kerem Ural , Gizem Gül , Serdar Paşa Mehmet Gültekin , Hasan Erdoğan , Songül Erdoğan Halil İbrahim Adak

https://doi.org/10.24880/maeuvfd.521268

Abstract

Kedilerde baş ve boyun bölgesi dermatiti (Bbbd), geniş doğal oluşumu ve her
gün artan vaka sayısı nedeniyle büyük ilgi uyandırmaktadır. Kaşıntı lezyonların
bilinen özelliğidir. Bu retrospektif
çalışmada, toplam 15 kedi [7 sağlıklı ve 8 baş ve boyun dermatiti ile]
kaydedilmiş ve seçilen cilt biyofizik belirteci için korenometrik analize tabi
tutulmuştur. Ortalama (standart sapma) pH değerleri açısından, sağlıklı
olanların aksine, Fhnd'li kedilerde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark (p =
0.003) gözlenmiştir. Öte yandan, hidrasyon değerlerinin değerlerinde bir
anlamlılık gözlenmemiştir. Sonuç olarak bu çalışma Bbbd bulunan kedilerde
topikal uygulamalarda dikkat edilmesi gerektiğini belirten ön çalışma verileri
olarak değerlendirilebilir.

Keywords

dermatit, deri, ph

Measurement of skin hydration by corneometric analysis of head and neck dermatitis cats:

Abstract

Feline head and neck dermatitis (Fhnd) has been
arousing great interest due to its wide natural occurence and increased number
of cases everyday. Pruritus is the well known hallmark of the lesions. In the
present retrospective study a total of 15 cats [7 healthy and 8 with head and
neck dermatitis] were enrolled and subjected to corenometric analysis for
selected skin biophysical marker. Regarding mean (standart deviation) pH values
a stastistically significant difference (p=0.003) was
observed among cats with Fhnd in contrast to healthy ones. On the other hand no
significance was observed to those of hydration values. In conclusion it should
not be unwise to draw preliminary results concluding topical preperation should
be used in caution to those of cats with Fhnd. 

Keywords

dermatitis, skin, ph

References

• Referans 1. Ural K, Erdoğan H, GÜLTEKİN M. Allergen specific IgE determination by in vitro allergy test in head and facial feline dermatitis: A pilot study. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2018; 65(4):379-386.Referans 2. Carlotti DN. Feline atopy. In: Kirk’s Current Veterinary Therapy XI, Small Animal Practice. 11ed. p.509-512. Saunders; 1992. Referans 3. Scott DW, Miller WH, Griffin CE. Feline atopy. Immunologic skin diseases. Small animal dermatology 1995; 518-523.Referans 4. Szczepanik M, Pomorska D, Wılkolek P. Diagnostic approach to atopy in cats. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy 2008; 52: 477-480.Referans 5. Szczepanik MP, Wilkołek PM, Adamek ŁR, Kalisz G, Gołyński M, Sitkowski W, Taszkun I. Correlation between transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and severity of clinical symptoms in cats with atopic dermatitis. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 2018; 82(4): 306-311.Referans 6. Szczepanik MP, Wilkołek PM, Adamek ŁR, Zając M, Gołyński M, Sitkowski W, Taszkun I. Evaluation of the correlation between Scoring Feline Allergic Dermatitis and Feline Extent and Severity Index and skin hydration in atopic cats. Veterinary dermatology 2018; 29(1): 34-e16. DOİ: 10.1111/vde.12489Referans 7. Scott DW, Miller WH, Griffin CE. Skin immune system and allergic skin diseases. In: Muller and Kirk’s Small Animal Dermatology. 6th ed. p.543-666. Philadelphia: WBSaunders; 2001.Referans 8. Foster AP, Roosje PJ. Update on feline immunoglobulin E and diagnostic recommendations for atopy. In: Consultation in Feline Internal Medicine. 4 th ed. p.229-238. Saunders; 2006. Referans 9. Reinero CR. Feline immunoglobulin E: historical prespective, diagnostics and clinical relevance. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 2009; 132(1): 13-20. DOİ: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2009.09.010Referans 10. Hobi S, Linek M, Marignac G, Olivry T, Beco L, Nett C, Fontaine J, Roosje P, Bergvall K, Belove S, Koebrich S, Pin D, Kovalik M, Meury S, Wilhelm S, Favrot C. Clinical characteristics and causes of pruritus in cats: A multicentre study on feline hypersensitivity-associated dermatoses. Veterinary Dermatology 2011; 22(5): 406-413. DOİ: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2011.00962.xReferans 11. Prost C. Diagnosis of feline allergic diseases: a study of 90 cats. In: Advance in Veterinary Dermatology Volume 9, 3th ed. p516-517 USA: Wiley-Blackwell; 1998.Referans 12. Foster AP. Diagnosing and treating feline atopy. Veterinary Medicine 2002; 97: 226-240.Referans 13. Bryan J, Frank LA. Food allergy in the cat: a diagnosis of elimination. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 2010; 12(11): 861-866. DOİ: 10.1016/j.jfms.2010.09.005Referans 14. Favrot C, Steffan J, Seewald W, Hobi S, Linek M, Marignac G, Olivry T, Beco L, Nett C, Fontaine J, Rossje P, Bergvall K, Belova S, Koebrich S, Pin D, Kovalik M, Meury S, Wilhelm S. Establishment of diagnostic criteria for feline non-fleainduced hypersensitivity dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology 2012; 23(1): 45-50.Referans 15. Prelaud P, Guaguere E, Freiche V, Drouard C, Laforge H. The allergic cat. Pratique Medicale et Chirurgicale de I’Animal de Compagnie 1999; 34: 437-447.Referans 16. White SD, Sequoia D. Food hypersensitivity in cats: 14 cases (1982-1987). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1989; 194(5): 692-695.Referans 17. Carlotti DN, Remy I, Prost C. Food allergy in dogs and cats. A review and report of 43 cases. Veterinary Dermatology 1990; 1(2): 55-62. DOİ: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.1990.tb00080.xReferans 18. Walton GS. Skin responses in the dog and cat to ingested allergens. Veterinary Record 1967; 81: 709-713. DOİ: 10.1136/vr.81.27.709Referans 19. Scott DW. Feline dermatology 1983-1985: the secret sits. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 1987; 23: 255-274.Referans 20. Biro K, Thaçi D, Ochsendorf FR, Kaufmann R, Boehncke WH. Efficacy of dexpanthenol in skin protection against irritation: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Contact Dermatitis 2003; 49: 80-84. DOİ: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2003.00184.xReferans 21. Rudolph R, Kownatzki E. Corneometric, sebumetric and TEWL measurements following the cleaning of atopic skin with a urea emulsion versus a detergent cleanser. Contact Dermatitis 2004; 50: 354-358. DOİ: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00368.xReferans 22. Fluhr JW, Feingold KR, Elias PM. Transepidermal water loss reflects permeability barier status: validation in human and rodent in vivo and ex vivo models. Experimental Dermatology 2006; 15: 483-492. DOİ: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2006.00437.xReferans 23. Aschoff R, Schwanebeck U, Brautigam M, Meurer M. Skin physiological parameters confirm the therapeutic efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1% in patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis. Experimental Dermatology 2009; 18: 24-29. DOİ: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2008.00756.xReferans 24. Marsella R, Samuelson D, Doerr K. Transmission electron microscopy studies in an experimental model of canine atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology 2010; 21: 81-88. DOİ: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2009.00802.xReferans 25. Miller WH, Griffin CE, Campbell KL. İn: Muller & Kirk’s Small Animal Dermatology. 7th ed. pp. 388–392 St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2013.Referans 26. Hnilca KA. İn: Small Animal Dermatology: A Color Atlas and Therapeutic Guide. 3rd ed. pp. 198–199 Elsevier Saunders; 2011. Referans 27. Bajwa, J. Atopic dermatitis in cats. The Canadian Veterinary Journal 2018, 59(3), 311-313.Referans 28. Taglinger K, Day MJ, Foster AP. Characterization of inflammatory cell infiltration in feline allergic skin disease. Journal of Comparative Pathology 2007;137:211–223. DOİ: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2007.07.001Referans 29. Mayer W, Neurad K. Comparison of skin pH in domesticated and laboratory mammals. Archives of Dermatological Research 1991; 283: 16-18. Referans 30. Schmid-Wendtner MH, Korting HC. The pH of the skin surface and its impact on the barrier function. Skin Pharmacology and Physiology 2006; 19: 296-302. DOİ: 10.1159/000094670Referans 31. Young LA, Dodge JC, Guest KJ, Cline JL, Kerr WW. Age,breed, sex and period effects on skin biophysical parameters for dogs fed canned dog food. The Journal of Nutrition 2002; 132:1695-1697. DOİ: 10.1093/jn/132.6.1695SReferans 32. Bourdeau P, Taylor KW, Nguyen P, Biourge V. Evaluation of the influence of sex, diet and time on skin pH and surface lipids of cats. Veterinary Dermatology 2004; 15(1): 41-69. DOİ: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2004.00414_2.xReferans 33. Matousek JL, Campbell KL. A Comparative review of cutaneous pH. Veterinary Dermatology 2002; 13: 293-300. DOİ: 10.1046/j.1365-3164.2002.00312.xReferans 34. Popiel J, Nicpon J. Relacje pomiedzy pH skory w przebiegu pyoderm u psow przed i po zastosowaniu preparatow dzialajacych zewnetrznie. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Medicina Veterinaria 2004; 3(1): 53-60.Referans 35. Ural K, Erdoğan H, Ateş DS. Köpek Epidermisinin pH Seviyesi: Gelişigüzel İnsan Ürünleri Pet Hayvanlarda Kullanılabilir mi?. Kocatepe Veteriner Dergisi 2018; 11(4): 491-494. DOİ: 10.30607/kvj.453388