Integration of design for disassembly method using recycled mahogany material in modular furniture

Abstract

This paper explores the Design for Disassembly (DfD) methodological approach in the furniture design process. Design for Disassembly is a product design strategy that enables a product to be disassembled for easier maintenance allowing cost-effective recovery of reusable components and materials, which are important for optimizing products for reuse and recycling at the end of their life cycle. The modular concept further enhances this approach by allowing for interchangeable parts enabling customers to repair and upgrade their furniture without needing a complete replacement. Furthermore, this paper provides an overview of Design for Disassembly approaches on furniture development as an effective tool for significant reduction for new raw materials using recycled mahogany material that result from adopting these practices. The main aim of this research is to support the current and future development in the field of disassembly, promoting a more sustainable utilization of resources, contributing to a circular economy and minimizing the environmental impact of furniture manufacturing.

Keywords

• design for disassembly
• sustainable waste management
• resource efficiency
• modular furniture

Supporting Institution

Telkom University

Project Number

1

Ethical Statement

This paper was conducted in agreement with ethical standards for academic publishing. Authors declare no conflicts of interest that could influence the research outcomes or interpretation of results. All data collection, analysis, and reporting were done with integrity. Sources have been properly cited throughout the paper. This work has not been previously published and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.

Thanks

My sincere gratitude to Telkom University for their support in the development of this paper. Thanks to Mrs. Sheila Putri Andita for her collaborative partnership and contributions throughout the writing process. I would also like to acknowledge INPI House for providing access to their facilities as an observation site and for supplying material resources. I express my appreciation to DergiPark Akademik for publishing this paper and this research accessible to the academic community

Modüler mobilyalarda geri dönüştürülmüş maun malzemesi kullanılarak sökme yöntemi için tasarımın entegrasyonu

Abstract

Bu çalışma, mobilya tasarım sürecinde Demontaj İçin Tasarım (DiT) metodolojik yaklaşımını incelemektedir. Demontaj İçin Tasarım, ürünün daha kolay bakım için demonte edilmesini sağlayan ve yeniden kullanılabilir bileşenlerin ve malzemelerin maliyet etkin bir şekilde geri kazanılmasını sağlayan bir ürün tasarım stratejisidir; bu bileşenler, yaşam döngülerinin sonunda yeniden kullanım ve geri dönüşüm için ürünleri optimize etmek için önemlidir. Modüler konsept, değiştirilebilir parçalara izin vererek bu yaklaşımı daha da geliştirir ve müşterilerin mobilyalarını tamamen değiştirmeye gerek kalmadan onarmalarını ve yükseltmelerini sağlar. Ayrıca, bu çalışma, bu uygulamaları benimsemekten kaynaklanan geri dönüştürülmüş maun malzemesini kullanarak yeni hammaddeler için önemli bir azalma sağlayan etkili bir araç olarak mobilya geliştirmede Demontaj İçin Tasarım yaklaşımlarına genel bir bakış sunmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, demontaj alanındaki mevcut ve gelecekteki gelişmeleri desteklemek, kaynakların daha sürdürülebilir bir şekilde kullanılmasını teşvik etmek, döngüsel ekonomiye katkıda bulunmak ve mobilya üretiminin çevresel etkisini en aza indirmektir.

Keywords

• design for disassembly
• sustainable waste management
• resource efficiency
• modular furniture

Project Number

1

References

1. Agustín, P., Escoto, O., Ángel, M., & Muñoz, Z. (2020). Design for disassembly (dfd) as strategy for redesign and optimization of products. INEGI-FEUP, 445–458.
2. Andaresta Luke. (2024). March). Masa depan cerah bisnis furniture. Indonesia Exchange.
3. Bowen, G. A. (2017). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI: 10.3316/QRJ0902027
4. Cheng, J. (2018). Product Design Process and Methods. In Product Lifecycle Management - Terminology and Applications. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.80821
5. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In Strategies of qualitative inquiry, 3rd ed. (pp. 1–43). Sage Publications, Inc.
6. Dounas, T., & Spaeth, A. B. (2014). Universal dovetail joint. Rethinking Comprehensive Design: Speculative Counterculture - Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, CAADRIA 2014, 409–418. DOI: 10.52842/conf.caadria.2014.409
7. Dowie, & Brahma. (2001). Design for Disassembly. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Design and Contextual Studies.
8. EnGen Institute. (2005). Design for Disassembly Guidelines.

9. Galantucci, L. M., Percoco, G., & Spina, R. (2004). Assembly and Disassembly Planning by using Fuzzy Logic & Genetic Algorithms. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 1(2). DOI: 10.5772/5622
10. Gershenson, J. K., Prasad, G. J., & Allamneni, S. (1999). Modular product design: a life-cycle view. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science: Transactions of the SDPS, Official Journal of the Society for Design and Process Science, 3(4), 13–26. DOI: 10.3233/JID-1999-3402
11. Gershenson, J. K., Prasad, G. J., & Zhang, Y. (2003). Product modularity: Definitions and benefits. In Journal of Engineering Design (Vol. 14, Issue 3, pp. 295–313). DOI: 10.1080/0954482031000091068
12. Gershenson, J. K., Prasad, G. J., & Zhang, Y. (2004). Product modularity: Measures and design methods. In Journal of Engineering Design (Vol. 15, Issue 1, pp. 33–51). DOI: 10.1080/0954482032000101731
13. Gregory, S. A. (1966a). The design method the design method part of the architecture commons, and the art and design commons.
14. Ilgın, H. E., Karjalainen, M., & Koponen, O.-P. (n.d.). Review of the Current State-of-the-Art of Dovetail Massive Wood Elements. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.99090
15. Jaykumar Yoga Mule. (2012). Design for Disassembly Approaches on Product Development. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 3(6).
16. Mubaslat, A. (2021). Introduction to Waste Management.
17. Rios, F. C., Chong, W. K., & Grau, D. (2015). Design for disassembly and deconstruction - challenges and opportunities, Procedia Engineering, 118, 1296–1304. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.485
18. Sosale, S., Hashemian, M., & Gu, P. (1997). Product Modularization for Reuse and Recycling. Concurrent Product Design and Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing, 195–206. DOI: 10.1115/IMECE1997-0019
19. Sumiyoshi, T., & Matsui, G. (1989). wood-joints-in-classical-japanese-architecture (Ferenc Kovaks, Trans.). Kajima Institute Publishing Co., Ltd.
20. Tseng, M. M., Wang, Y., & Jiao, R. J. (2018). Modular Design. In CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering (pp. 1–10). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35950-7_6460-4
21. Ulrich, K. (1994). Fundamentals of Product Modularity. In S. Dasu & C. Eastman (Eds.), Management of Design: Engineering and Management Perspectives (pp. 219–231). Springer Netherlands. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-1390-8_12