Döngüsel ekonomi farkındalığı ve mobilya endüstrisindeki motivasyonlar: küresel güney dinamiklerinin bir mikrokozmosu olarak İnegöl

Year 2024, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 38 - 53, 30.06.2024

Serkan Bayraktaroğlu , Hayriye Yasemin Soylu

https://doi.org/10.33725/mamad.1474192

Abstract

Bu çalışma, karmaşık dinamikleri aydınlatmak amacıyla Küresel Güney'deki döngüsel ekonomi (DE) geçişlerinin ayırt edici özelliklerini incelemektedir. İnegöl, Türkiye'deki mobilya kümelenmesi bir vaka çalışması olarak kullanılmıştır. Araştırma, endüstrinin mevcut perspektifini göstermek için döngüsel ekonomi farkındalık anketi kullanmaktadır. Kümeden toplamda 40 şirkete ulaşılmış ve sonuçlar tematik analiz ve tanımlayıcı istatistikler kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Ayrıca, potansiyel DE geçişlerinin engellerini ve motivasyonlarını daha iyi anlamak için, ekosistemin önemli bir figürüyle yarı yapılandırılmış bir mülakat yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın ana bulguları, Küresel Kuzey'e kıyasla, Küresel Güney'de faaliyet gösteren şirketlerin DE kapsamına yönelik daha az farkındalığa sahip olduğunu ve uygulamaların atık azaltımı ve enerji verimliliği ile sınırladığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca, yeni tasarım ve inovasyon çabaları DE'nin uygulanmasıyla ilgili beklenen faydalar arasında tanımlanmamıştır. Bu makale, Küresel Güney'den ihracatçı şirketlerin, döngüsel ekonomi konusundaki sınırlı anlayışları nedeniyle yakın gelecekte, özellikle AB'nin 2026 Net Sıfır CO2 Planı sonrasında, AB pazarlarında rekabet avantajlarını sürdürmede zorluk yaşayabilecekleri gerçeğine işaret etmektedir.

Keywords

Döngüsel Ekonomi, Mobilya Endüstrisi, Tasarım, Küresel Güney

Ethical Statement

It was declared by the authors that scientific and ethical principles have been followed in this study and all the resources used have been properly cited.

Supporting Institution

İstanbul Bilgi University

Project Number

AK 85 102

Thanks

The authors would like to thank İstanbul Bilgi University. Also the authors would like to thank the project assistants Sueda Bayazıt and Hamiyet Onay for their support in data collection and literature review and Derin Seymen for updating the exporters database.

Circular economy awareness and motivations in the furniture industry: İnegöl as a microcosm of global south dynamics

Abstract

This study examines the distinctive characteristics of circular economy (CE) transitions in the Global South with the aim of elucidating the complex dynamics. The furniture cluster in İnegöl, Türkiye, is employed as a case study. A circular economy awareness survey is employed to illustrate the current perspective of the industry. In total, 40 companies from the cluster were reached, and the results were analyzed using thematic analysis and descriptive statistics. Furthermore, a semi-structured interview was conducted with a key figure within the ecosystem to gain a deeper understanding of the barriers and motivations for potential CE transitions. The study’s key findings reveal that companies operating in the Global South have less awareness of the coverage of CE with applications confined to waste reduction and energy efficiency in comparison to the Global North. Additionally, new design and innovation efforts are not identified among the expected benefits related to implementing CE. This paper highlights the fact that exporting companies from the Global South may face challenges for sustaining their competitive advantage in EU markets, particularly after the 2026 Net Zero CO2 Plan due to their limited understanding of CE.

Keywords

Circular Economy, Furniture Industry, Design, Global South, İnegöl Furniture

Ethical Statement

This study was approved by the Istanbul University Social Sciences and Humanities Ethical Committee (Study reference no: 2023/1696897).

Supporting Institution

This study was supported by İstanbul Bilgi University Scientific Research Project funding with the project number AK 85 102.

Project Number

AK 85 102

Thanks

We also would like to thank the project assistants Süeda Bayazıt and Hamiyet Onay for their support in data collection and literature review and Derin Seymen for updating the exporter database.

References

• Acerbi, F., & Taisch, M. (2020). A literature review on circular economy adoption in the manufacturing sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123086
• Adhikari, S., & Ozarska, B. (2018). Minimizing environmental impacts of timber products through the production process “From Sawmill to Final Products”. Environmental Systems Research, 7(1), 1-15. DOI: 10.1186/s40068-018-0109-x Adomako, S., Simms, C., Vazquez‐Brust, D., & Nguyen, H. T. (2023). Stakeholder green pressure and new product performance in emerging countries: a cross‐country study. British Journal of Management, 34(1), 299-320. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12595
• Agrawal, V., Atasu, A., & Ülkü, S. (2021). Leasing, modularity, and the circular economy. Management Science, 67(11), 6782-6802. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2020.3829
• Arranz, N., F. Arroyabe, C. and Fernandez de Arroyabe, C. (2019). The effect of regional factors in the development of eco-innovations in the firm. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28 (7), 1406-1415. DOI: 10.1002/bse.2322 Araz, Ç. & Yaşar, O. (2020) İnegöl İlçesinde Mobilya Sanayiinin Yapısal Özellikleri, Dağılışı ve Yaşanan Sorunlara Yönelik Bir değerlendirme. Kesit Akademi Dergisi, 6(24), 173-203.
• Ayçin, E., & Kayapinar Kaya, S. (2021). Towards the circular economy: Analysis of barriers to implementation of Turkey’s zero waste management using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Waste Management & Research, 39(8), 1078-1089. DOI: 10.1177/0734242X20988781
• Azizli, B. (2021). Circular Economy: An Analysis for Turkey. Regional and Business Studies, 13(2), 31-44. DOI: 10.33568/rbs.2915
• Azizi, M., Mohebbi, N., & De Felice, F. (2016). Evaluation of sustainable development of wooden furniture industry using multi criteria decision making method. Agriculture and agricultural science procedia, 8, 387-394. DOI: 10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.034 Barbaritano, M., Bravi, L., & Savelli, E. (2019). Sustainability and quality management in the Italian luxury furniture sector: A circular economy perspective. Sustainability, 11(11), 30-89. DOI: 10.3390/su11113089
• Benton, D., Hazell, J. and Hill, J. (2015), The guide to the circular economy: capturing value and managing material risk, Do Sustainability, Routledge, London, pp. 15-86. DOI: 10.4324/9781351274364 Bocken, M.P., Ritala, P. & Huotari, P. (2017). The circular economy: Exploring the introduction of the concept among S&P 500 firms. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21, 487–490. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12605 Briguglio, M., Llorente-González, L. J., Meilak, C., Pereira, Á., Spiteri, J., & Vence, X. (2021). Born or grown: Enablers and barriers to circular business in Europe. Sustainability, 13(24), 13670. DOI: 10.3390/su132413670
• Bursa Belediyesi (2022). Bursa sürdürülebı̇lı̇r enerjı̇ ve ı̇klı̇m değı̇şı̇klı̇ğı̇ uyum planı ı̇zleme ve değerlendı̇rme raporu (sera gazı emisyonu ve eylem planı) [Bursa Sustainable Energy and Climate Change Adaptation Plan Monitoring and Evaluation Report] https://www.bursa.bel.tr/dosyalar/galeri_x/dxzmvjj591wsw4k.pdf
• Çelik, A. N., & Özgür, E. (2020). Review of Turkey’s photovoltaic energy status: Legal structure, existing installed power and comparative analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 134. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110344
• de Jesus, A., & Mendonça, S. (2018). Lost in transition? Drivers and barriers in the eco-innovation road to the circular economy. Ecological Economics, 145, 75-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001
• de Oliveira, F. R., França, S. L. B., Rangel, L. A. D. (2018). Challenges and opportunities in a circular economy for a local productive arrangement of furniture in Brazil. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 202‐209. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.031
• Demirel P. & Kesidou E. (2019). Sustainability-oriented capabilities for eco-innovation: meeting the regulatory, technology and market demands. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28, 847-857. DOI: 10.1002/bse.2286
• Dubey, S. K., & Bansal, S. (2012). Barriers in implementing radical/incremental changes in manufacturing-based government organizations. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 2(2), 48. DOI: 10.52283/NSWRCA.AJBMR.20120202A06 Eser, L. Y., & Polat, S. (2015). Elektrik Üretiminde Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynaklarinin Kullanimina Yönelik Teşvikler: Türkiye ve İskandinav Ülkeleri Uygulamalari. Gümüshane University Electronic Journal of the Institute of Social Science/Gümüshane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Elektronik Dergisi, 6(12).
• Ghisellini, P., & Ulgiati, S. (2020). Circular economy transition in Italy. Achievements, perspectives and constraints. Journal of cleaner production, 243. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118360
• Govindan, K., & Hasanagic, M. (2018). A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: a supply chain perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1-2), 278-311. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1402141
• Gödel, R., & Beyhan, M. (2021). Entegre Katı Atık Yönetimi; İnegöl Örneği. [Integrated Solid Waste Management; İnegöl Case Study] Bilge International Journal of Science and Technology Research, 5(1). DOI: 10.30516/bilgesci.590140
• Hazen, B. T., Mollenkopf, D. A., & Wang, Y. (2017). Remanufacturing for the circular economy: An examination of consumer switching behavior. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 451-464. DOI: 10.1002/bse.1929
• Hira, A., Pacini, H., Attafuah-Wadee, K., & Hassall, J. (2022). Sustainable manufacturing and environmental pollution programme (SMEP): A circular economy experiment in the global south. Journal of Developing Societies, 38(3), 287-309. DOI: 10.1177/0169796X221106013
• Hoag, B. G., Ritschard, H. V., & Cooper, C. L. (2002). Obstacles to effective organizational change: The underlying reasons. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(1), 6-15. DOI: 10.1108/01437730210414526
• Husgafvel, R., Linkosalmi, L., Hughes, M., Kanerva, J., Dahl, O. (2018). Forest sector circular economy development in Finland:A regional study on sustainability driven competitive advantage and an assessment of the potential for cascading recovered solid wood. Journal of cleaner production, 181, 483‐497 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.176
• Interviewee 1 Interview: Zoom Meeting, on 4th Jan. 2024, with the key figure of an NGO representing İnegöl Furniture Manufacturers.
• Iritani, D. R., Silva, D. L., Saavedra, Y. M. B., Grael, P. F. F., & Ometto, A. R. (2015). Sustainable strategies analysis through Life Cycle Assessment: a case study in a furniture industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 308-318. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.029 Jan, M. T. (2022). Factors influencing the purchase of circular economy products: a comparative analysis of Malaysia and Turkey. International Journal of Business and Society, 23(2), 802-819. DOI: 10.33736/ijbs.4839.2022
• Kirchherr, J. W., Hekkert, M. P., Bour, R., Huijbrechtse-Truijens, A., Kostense-Smit, E., & Muller, J. (2017). Breaking the barriers to the circular economy. Utrecht University: Utrecht, The Netherlands.
• Korkmaz, M. (2018). Public awareness and perceptions of climate change: differences in concern about climate change in the West Mediterranean region of Turkey. Applied Ecology & Environmental Research, 16(4). DOI: 10.15666/aeer/1604_40394050
• Koska, A., & Erdem, M. B. (2023). Performance Analysis of Manufacturing Waste Using SWARA and VIKOR Methods: Evaluation of Turkey within the Scope of the Circular Economy. Sustainability, 15(16), 12-110. DOI: 10.3390/su151612110
• Koszewska, M., & Bielecki, M. (2020). How to make furniture industry more circular? The role of component standardisation in ready-to-assemble furniture. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(3), 16-88. DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2020.7.3(17)
• Kumar, V., Sezersan, I., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Gonzalez, E. D., & Al-Shboul, M. D. A. (2019). Circular economy in the manufacturing sector: benefits, opportunities and barriers. Management Decision, 57(4), 1067-1086. DOI: 10.1108/MD-09-2018-1070
• MacArthur, E. (2013). Towards the circular economy: Opportunities for the consumer goods sector. Ellen MacArthur Foundation.
• Muchangos, L. S. D. (2022). Mapping the circular economy concept and the global south. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2(1), 71-90. DOI:10.1007/s43615-021-00095-0
• Nazlı, M. (2016). Does Sustainability Matter? A Qualitative Study in Tourism Industry in Turkey. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 11(44), 339-350. DOI:10.19168/jyu.55132 Nozharov, S. (2019, November). Identification of the Barriers to the Circular Economy–the Case of the Furniture Industry. In Digitalisation and Circular Economy: Forestry and Forestry Based Industry Implications–Proceedings of Scientific Papers, 12th Wood EMA Annual International Scientific Conference (pp. 111-116).
• Odeh, L. E. (2010). A comparative analysis of global north and global south economies. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 12(3) 338-348.
• Oliveira, F. R. D., Santos, R. F. D., França, S. L. B., & Rangel, L. A. D. (2020). Strategies and challenges for the circular economy: A case study in Portugal and a panorama for Brazil. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 63.
• Ormazabal, M., Prieto-Sandoval, V., Puga-Leal, R., & Jaca, C. (2018). Circular economy in Spanish SMEs: challenges and opportunities. Journal of cleaner production, 185, 157-167. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.031 Panwar, R. (2023). Optimism Amid Despair. How to avoid a Net-zero Debacle. Business and Society, 62(1), 9-13. DOI: 10.1177/00076503211053816
• Pieroni, M. P., McAloone, T. C., & Pigosso, D. C. (2021). Circular economy business model innovation: Sectorial patterns within manufacturing companies. Journal of cleaner production, 286. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124921 Pieterse, J. N. (2000). Globalization north and south: Representations of uneven development and the interaction of modernities. Theory, culture & society, 17(1), 129-137.
• Salihoğlu, G., Poroy, Z., and Salihoğlu, N. K. (2019). Kentsel atık yönetiminde yaşam döngüsü değerlendirmesi: Bursa analizi [Life cycle assessment for municipal waste management: Analysis for Bursa]. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 25(6) 692-699 DOI: 10.5505/pajes.2018.33603
• Sarja, M., Onkila, T., & Mäkelä, M. (2021). A systematic literature review of the transition to the circular economy in business organizations: Obstacles, catalysts and ambivalences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 125492. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125492
• Schröder, P., Anantharaman, M., Anggraeni, K., & Foxon, T. J. (Eds.). (2019). The circular economy and the Global South: sustainable lifestyles and green industrial development. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429434006
• Serin, H., Şahin, Y., & Durgun, M. (2014). Furniture sector of Turkey. European Journal of Research on Education, EJRE, 2, 149-153.
• Şenkal, H. (2023). Mobilya endüstrisinde döngüsel ekonomiye geçiş: Değerlendirme yaklaşımı. [Transition to circular economy in the furniture industry: An evaluation approach] Mobilya ve Ahşap Malzeme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 146-161. DOI: 10.33725/mamad.1316221
• Suchek, N., Ferreira, J. J., & Fernandes, P. O. (2022). A review of entrepreneurship and circular economy research: State of the art and future directions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(5), 2256-2283. DOI: 10.1002/bse.3020
• Stern, N., & Valero, A. (2021). Innovation, growth and the transition to net zero emissions. Research Policy, 50(9), 104293. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104293
• Susanty, A., Tjahjono, B., & Sulistyani, R. E. (2020). An investigation into circular economy practices in the traditional wooden furniture industry. Production Planning & Control, 31(16), 1336-1348. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2019.1707322
• Syeda, S. R., Khan, E. A., Padungwatanaroj, O., Kuprasertwong, N., & Tula, A. K. (2022). A perspective on hazardous chemical substitution in consumer products. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 36. DOI: 10.1016/j.coche.2021.100748 Tahulela, A. C., & Ballard, H. H. (2020). Developing the circular economy in South Africa: challenges and opportunities. Sustainable Waste Management: Policies and Case Studies: 7th IconSWM—ISWMAW 2017, Volume 1, 125-133.
• Tatoglu, E., Frynas, J. G., Bayraktar, E., Demirbag, M., Sahadev, S., Doh, J., & Koh, S. L. (2020). Why do emerging market firms engage in voluntary environmental management practices? A strategic choice perspective. British Journal of Management, 31(1), 80-100.
• TUSIAD (2021). Avrupa Yeşil Mutabakatı Döngüsel Ekonomi Eylem Planı Türk İş Dünyasına Neler Getirecek? [What will the European Green Deal Circular Economy Action Plan bring to the Turkish Business World?] https://tusiad.org/tr/yayinlar/raporlar/item/10790-avrupa-yesil-mutabakati-dongusel-ekonomi-eylem-plani-turk-is-dunyasina-neler-getirecek
• Url 1:https://www.itso.org.tr/dosyalar/2023EkonomiRaporu.pdf
• Url-2:https://inmob.org.tr/mobilya-fuarlari/
• Url-3 https://www.imos.org.tr/
• Vaajasaari, K., Kulovaara, M., Joutti, A., Schultz, E., & Soljamo, K. (2004). Hazardous properties of paint residues from the furniture industry. Journal of hazardous materials, 106(2-3), 71-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2003.11.004 Wicaksono, P. A., & Kadafi, C. A. (2020). The Improvement of Production Process Impact in Furniture Industry Toward Circular Economy. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 202, p. 07052). EDP Sciences. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202020207052
• Yalçın, N. G., & Foxon, T. J. (2021). A systemic approach to transitions towards circular economy: The case of Brighton and Hove. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 3. DOI: 10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100038