KIRGIZISTAN ÜNIVERSITE ÖĞRECILERI ARASINDAKI FLÖRT, EVLILIĞE BAKIŞ VE EVLILIK HAZIRLIKLARI

Year 2006, Volume: 8 Issue: 16, 207 - 218, 01.10.2006

Sevinç Karadağ

Abstract

Bu çalışma, anket verilerini kullanarak Kırgızistan’da evlilik ve evliliğe hazırlanmada bazı algı ve davranışları araştırmaktadır. Sonuçlar, öğrencilerin çoğunun evlilik öncesi flört deneyimine ve evliliğe olumlu baktıklarını göstermektedir. Hemen hemen bütün örnekler temelde evliliğe kendi tercihleri olarak karar vermektedirler. Bununla beraber yarısından daha azı evlilik için hazır olduklarını hissetmektedirler. Tek tek yapılan görüşmelerin büyük bir çoğunluğu evlilik ve aile hayatı için bir hazırlığa gerek olduğunu bildirmişlerdir. Bu çalışma, aynı zamanda, evliliği algılama ve flörte dair etnik gruba ve cinsiyete göre fakları da bulmuştur

Keywords

Evlilik, Flört, Üniversite öğrencileri, Kırgızistan

DATING BEHAVIOURS, VIEWS OF MARRIAGE AND MARITAL PREPARATION AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN KYRGYZSTAN

Abstract

This study explores dating behaviours and perceptions of students on some aspects of marriage and marital preparation in Kyrgyzstan by using questionnaire data. The results indicated that the majority of students had dating experiences to date and also had a positive approach towards marriage. Almost entire sample preferred self-initiated marriage. However, less than half of them felt that they were ready for marriage. Vast majority of the individuals reported a need for preparation in relation to marriage and family life. The Most frequently cited topics for possible marital preparation courses were communication and conflict management. This study also found ethnic group and gender differences regarding dating and perceptions of marriage

Keywords

University Students in Kyrgyzstan.

References

• AGADJANIAN, V. (1999). Post-Soviet demographic paradoxes: ethnic differences in marriage and fertility in Kazakhstan. Sociological Forum, 14, 425-446.
• ATALAY, B., KONTAS, M., BEYAZIT, S., & MADENOGLU, K. (1992). Türk aile yapısı araştırması [Investigation of Turkish family structure]. Devlet Planlama Teşkilati
• Sosyal Planlama Genel Müdürlüğü Araştırma Dairesi. Yayin no: DPT: 313-SPGM: 421. Ankara: DPT Matbaa. BREHM, S. S. (1992). Intimate relationships (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw- Hill.
• CHERLIN, A.J. (1992). Marriage, divorce, remarriage. London: Harvard University Press.
• COOMBS, R.H. (1991). Marital status and personal well-being. Family Relations, 40, 102.
• CRAMER, D. (1998). Close relationships: The study of love and friendship. London: Arnold.
• ELEBAYEVA. A., OMURALIEV, N., & ABAZOV, R. (2000). The shifting identities and loyalties in Kyrgyzstan: The evidence from the field. Nationality papers, 28 (2), 350.
• DENISSENKO, M. B. (2005). Marriage patterns in Kyrgyzstan.Available at: http://iussp2005.princeton.edu/download .aspx?submissionId=51401
• GOODWIN, R., NIZHARADZE, G., LAN Anh Nguyen Luu., KOSA, E., EMELYANOVA, T. (1999). Glasnost and the art of conversation. Journal of Cross
• Cultural Psychology, 30, 71-91. GOODWIN, R., ALLEN, P., NIZHARADZE, G., EMELYANOVA, T., Dedkova, N., Saenko, Y., & Bugrova, I. (2002). Fatalism, social support, and mental health in four former Soviet cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1166-1172.
• GOTTMAN, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
• HAHLWEG, K., & MARKMAN, H. J. (1988). Effectiveness of behavioral marital therapy: Empirical status of behavioral techniques in preventing and alleviating marital distress. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 440-447.
• HALFORD, W. K. & SIMONS, M. (2005). Couple Relationship Education in
• Australia. Family Process, 44, 147-159. HORTAÇSU, N., BAŞTUĞ, S. Ş., & MOHAMMETBERDIEV, O. (2001). Change and stability with respect to attitudes and practices related to marriage in Ashkabat, Baku, and Ankara:Three Turkic cultures. International Journal of Psychology, 36, 108-120.
• HORWITZ, A., V., MCLAUGHLIN, J., & WHITE, H. R. (1997). How the negative and positive aspects of partner relationships affect the mental health of young married people. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 39, 124-136.
• HORWITZ, A. V., & WHITE, H. R. (1998). The relationship of cohabitation and mental health: A study of a young adult cohort. Journal of Marriage and the Family, , 505-514
• KAĞITÇIBAŞI, Ç. (1982). Old age security value of children: Cross-national socio economic evidence. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 13. 29-42.
• KLEINBACH, R., ABLEZOVA, M. & AITIEVA, M. (2005). Kidnapping for marriage
• (ala kachuu) in a Kyrgyz Village. Central Asian Survey 24 (2): 191-202. KNOKE, D. & BURKE, P. (1980). Log-linear models. London: Sage.
• KNOX, D., ZUSMAN, M. E., SNELL, S., COOPER, C. (1999). Characteristics of
• College Students who cohabit. College Student Journal, 33, 510-512. LEVINGER, G. (1990). Figure versus ground: Micro and macro perspectives on personal relationships. Invited address to the Fifth International Conference on Personal relationships, Oxford, England.
• MARKMAN, H. J., FLOYD, F. J., STANLEY, S. M., & STORAASLI, R. D. (1988).
• Prevention of marital distress: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 210-217. MARKMAN, H. J., & HAHLWEG, K. (1993). The prediction and prevention of marital distress: An international perspective. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 29-43.
• MARTIN, P. D., SPECTER, G., MARTIN, D., & MARTIN, M. (2003). Expressed attitudes toward marriage and family life. Adolescence, 38, 359-367.
• NOCH, S. L. (1995). A comparison of marriages and cohabitation relationships.
• Journal of Family Issues, 16, 53-76. PARKER, R. (2005). Research and evaluation in marriage and relationship education. Family Matters, 71, 32-35.
• ROSS, C. E., MIROWSKY, J., & GOLDSTEEN, K. (1990). The impact of family on health: The decade review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 1059-1078.
• SECCOMBE, K. (1991). Assessing the cost and benefits of children: Gender differences among the childfree Husbands and wifes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 191-202.
• SMOCK, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An Appraisal of Research
• Themes, Findings, and Implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1-20. SPRECHER, S., ARON, A., HATFIELD, E., CORTESE, A., POTAPOVA, E., & LEVITSKAYA, A. (1994). Love:American style, Russian style, and Japanese style.
• Personal Relationships, 1, 349-69. STACK, S., & ESHLEMAN, J. R. (1998). Marital status and happiness: A17-Nation study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 527-536.
• STANLEY, S. M., MARKMAN, H. J., PETERS, M. St., & LEBER, B. D. (1995).
• Strengthening marriages and preventing divorce. Family Relations, 44, 392-402. TANG, S., & ZUO, J. (2000). Dating attitudes and behaviors of American and Chinese college students. Social Science Journal, 37, 76-78.
• The World Factbook. (2003). Total fertility rates. http://www.bartelby.net/151/fields/30.html
• THORNTON, A. (1990). The courtship process and adolescent sexuality. Journal of Family Issues, 11, 239-265.
• UBA, L. (1994). Asian Americans: Personality patterns, identity, and mental health.
• New York: Guilford Press. WAITE, L., J. (2000). Case for marriage: Why Married people are happier, healthier and better off financially. Westminster, MD: Broadway Books.
• WHITE, A. (2005). Gender roles in contemporary Russia: Attitudes and expectations among women students. Europe-Asia Studies, 57, 429-455.
• WILLIAMS, L. M., RILEY, L. A., & DYKE, D. T. V. (1999). An empirical approach to designing marriage preparation programs. American Journal of Family Therapy, 27, , 283.
• ZAKHAROV, S. V. (2005).Recent trends in first marriage in Russia. Retarded second demographic transition.Available: http://issp2005.princeton.edu/download.aspx?submissionId=52306.