Türkiye’nin Kuzey Ege Denizi kıyılarındaki Sarpa Balığı’nın (Sarpa salpa Linnaeus, 1758) maksimum boyu Üzerine bir değerlendirme

Year 2020, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 41 - 44, 30.06.2020

Özgür Cengiz

Abstract

Bir ekosistemdeki canlıların maksimum boy, ağırlık ve yaş ile ilgili bilgileri populasyon dinamiği ve stok değerlendirme çalışmaları için gereklidir. Bu bağlamda, 28 Aralık 2018 tarihinde 40,1 cm toplam boya ve 850,00 gr ağırlığa sahip bir adet sarpa balığı ticari balıkçılar tarafından Kabatepe Limanı (Gelibolu Yarımadası) açıklarında uzatma ağları ile yakalanmıştır. Kanıtlanan bu boy Türkiye suları için ikinci maksimum boy kaydıdır.                                                                                                            

Keywords

Sarpa salpa, Sarpa, Maksimum boy, Gelibolu yarımadası, Türkiye

An assessment on maximum size of Salema (Sarpa salpa Linnaeus, 1758) in Northern Aegean coasts of Turkey

Abstract

The maximum length, weight, and age information of living things in an ecosystem are necessary for population dynamics and stock assessment studies. In this connection, A single specimen of Sarpa salpa with 40.1 cm in total length and 850.00 g in total weight was caught off Kabatepe Bight (Gallipoli Peninsula) with gillnets by the commercial fisherman on 28 December 2018. The proved length is second maximum size record for Turkish waters.                                                                                         

Keywords

Sarpa salpa, Salema, Maximum size, Gallipoli peninsula, Turkey

References

• Acarli, D., Kara, A., Bayhan, B. & Çoker, T. (2009). Catch composition and catch efficiency of species caught from Homa Lagoon (Izmir Bay, Aegean Sea). Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 26: 39-47.
• Acarli, D., Kara, A. & Bayhan, B. (2014). Length-weight relations for 29 fish species from Homa Lagoon, Aegean Sea, Turkey. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria, 44: 249-257.
• Acarli, D., Kale, S. & Çakır, K. (2018). A new maximum length for the garfish, Belone belone (Linnaeus, 1761) in the coast of Gökçeada Island (Aegean Sea. Turkey). Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 59: 385-389.
• Altın, A., Ayyıldız, H., Kale, S. & Alver, C. (2015). Length-weight relationships of forty-nine fish species from shallow waters of Gökçeada Island, northern Aegean Sea. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 39: 971-975.
• Anderson, R. O. & Gutreuter, S. J. (1983). Length, weight, and associated structural indices. In: Nielsen, L., Johnson D. (eds.), Fisheries techniques, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. p. 283-300.
• Bektaş, A. (2017). Gökçeada (Kuzey Ege Denizi) çerçevesinde yaşayan Sarpa (Sarpa salpa Linnaeus, 1758) balığının populasyonunun biyolojik özelliklerinin incelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Biyoloji Anabilim Dalı, 80 s.
• Cengiz, Ö. (2013). Length-weight relationships of 22 fish species from the Gallipoli Peninsula and Dardanelles (northeastern Mediterranean, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Zoology, 37: 419-422.
• Cengiz, Ö., Kızılkaya, B. & Paruğ, Ş. Ş. (2019). Ege Denizi için eşkina balığı’nın (Sciaena umbra Linnaeus, 1758) maksimum boy kaydı. KSU Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 22(4): 659-663.
• Dulčić, J. & Soldo, A. (2005). A new maximum length for the grey triggerfish, Balistes capriscus Gmelin, 1789 (Pisces: Balistidae) from the Adriatic Sea. Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries-Split Croatia, 88: 1-7.
• Freedman, J. A. & Noakes, D. L. G. (2002). Why are there no really big bony fishes? A poin of-view on maximum body size in teleosts and elasmobranches. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 12: 403-416.
• Froese, R. & Pauly, D. (Editors). (2019). FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org, version (08/2019).
• Gurkan, S., Bayhan, B., Akcınar, S. A. & Taskavak, E. (2010). Length-weight relationship of fish from shallow waters of Candarli Bay (North Aegean Sea, Turkey). Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 42: 495-498.
• Helfman, G. S., Collette, B. B., Facey, D. E. & Bowen, B. W. (2009). The diversity of fishes: Biology, evolution, and ecology. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, UK. 720 pp.
• Kara, A., Sağlam, C., Acarlı, D. & Cengiz, Ö. (2018). Length-weight relationships for 48 fish species of the Gediz Estuary, in İzmir Bay (Central Aegean Sea, Turkey). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 98(4): 879-884.
• Karakulak, F. S., Erk, H. & Bilgin, B. (2006). Length-weight relationships for 47 coastal fish species from the northern Aegean Sea, Turkey. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22: 274-278.
• Mater, S., Kaya, M. & Bilecenoğlu, M. (2009). Marine Fishes of Turkey (4th press), Ege University Fisheries Faculty Publishings, No. 68, İzmir (In Turkish).
• Özaydın, O. & Taşkavak, E. (2006). Length-weight relationships for 47 fish species from Izmir Bay (eastern Aegean Sea, Turkey). Acta Adriatica, 47: 211-216.
• Peters, R. H. (1983). The Ecological Implications of Body Size. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
• Quinn II, T. J. & Deriso, R. B. (1999). Quantitative fish dynamics. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, NY.
• van der Veer, H. W., Kooijman, S. A. L. M. & van der Meer, J. (2003). Body size scaling relationships in flatfish as predicted by Dynamic Energy Budgets (DEB theory): implications for recruitment. Journal of Sea Research, 50: 257-272.