Research Article

Comparıson of Simultaneous Integrated Boost Method for Different Treatments in Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy

Volume: 29 Number: 1 April 21, 2017
EN TR

Comparıson of Simultaneous Integrated Boost Method for Different Treatments in Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy

Abstract

A comparative planning study was undertaken to evaluate dosimetric differences between volumetric modulated arc therapy versus intensity modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of head and neck. Patients were investigated, with a standard prescription of three dose levels to the target volumes in 33 fractions. Simultaneous Integrated Boost technique was generated for all techniques, with similar planning objectives. Plans were calculated for 6MV photon using anisotropic analytical algorithm implemented in Eclipse treatment planning system. 9 field IMRT and 2 arc VMAT plans show superior dose homogeneity and dose conformity in PTVs. Doses to optic nerves, chiasm, eyes, lenses and protists were slightly lower in 7, 9 field IMRT plans. Doses to the brain stem, spinal cord, mandibula and larynx were better in the 2 arc VMAT techniques. Oral cavity dose reduced significantly with 1 arc VMAT. The high dose radiation volume to the normal tissue and the mean normal tissue dose decreased, but the low dose radiation volume increased slightly in the 1 and 2 arc VMAT plans. 1, 2 arc VMAT and 7, 9 field IMRT plans produced clinically acceptable treatment plan for the head and neck cancer. VMAT represents an attractive solution because of the shorter delivery time and the lower of monitor unit compared with IMRT.

Keywords

References

  1. 1 Nath, R., Biggs, P.J., Bova, F.J., Ling, C.C., Purdy, J.A., van de Geijn, J., Weinhous, M.S. (1994). SYN45 : AAPM Code of Practice for Radiotherapy Accelerators, Report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Task Group, USA.
  2. 2 Edward, C.H., Carlos, A.P., Luther, W.B. (2007). Perez and Brady’s Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology. Lippincott Williams&Wilkins (ed.), 5. baskı, New York, USA.
  3. 3 Hall, E.J., Giaccia, A.J. (2006). Radiobiology for the radiologist. Lippincott Williams&Wilkins (ed.), 6. baskı, Philadelphia, USA.
  4. 4 Carol, M.P. (1995). A system for planning and rotational delivery of intensity-modulated fields. International journal imaging systems technology, 6, 56-61.
  5. 5 Ling, C.C., Burman, C., Chui, C.S. (1996). Conformal radiation treatment of prostate cancer using inversely-planned intensity-modulated photon beams produced with dynamic multileaf collimation. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 35(4), 721-730.
  6. 6 International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. (2010). Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Photon-Beam Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), Oxford University, ICRU Report 83, UK.
  7. 7 Carol, M.P., Targovnik, H., Smith, D. (1992). 3-D planning and delivery system for optimized conformal therapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 24, 158.
  8. 8 Mundt, A.J., Roeske, J.C. (2005). Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy A Clinical Perspective. BC Decker (ed.), 5. baskı, Hamilton, USA.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ayşe Yumak Yahşi
MARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN-EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ, FİZİK BÖLÜMÜ
Türkiye

Ayşe Okumuş This is me
Yeni Yüzyıl Üniversitesi, Gaziosmanpaşa Hastanesi, Radyasyon Onkolojisi Bölümü, Gaziosmanpaşa, İstanbul

Fusun Tokatlı This is me
Medicana International İstanbul Hastanesi, Radyasyon Onkolojisi Bölümü, Beylikdüzü-İstanbul

Publication Date

April 21, 2017

Submission Date

April 14, 2017

Acceptance Date

February 20, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 29 Number: 1

APA
Çoşkun, B., Yahşi, A. Y., Okumuş, A., Aktaş, Ş., & Tokatlı, F. (2017). Baş Boyun Radyoterapisinde Farklı Tedavi Teknikleri İle Simultane Integre Boost Yönteminin Karşılaştırılması. Marmara Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 29(1), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.7240/marufbd.306338
AMA
1.Çoşkun B, Yahşi AY, Okumuş A, Aktaş Ş, Tokatlı F. Baş Boyun Radyoterapisinde Farklı Tedavi Teknikleri İle Simultane Integre Boost Yönteminin Karşılaştırılması. MAJPAS. 2017;29(1):20-28. doi:10.7240/marufbd.306338
Chicago
Çoşkun, Bilgehan, Ayşe Yumak Yahşi, Ayşe Okumuş, Şahin Aktaş, and Fusun Tokatlı. 2017. “Baş Boyun Radyoterapisinde Farklı Tedavi Teknikleri İle Simultane Integre Boost Yönteminin Karşılaştırılması”. Marmara Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 29 (1): 20-28. https://doi.org/10.7240/marufbd.306338.
EndNote
Çoşkun B, Yahşi AY, Okumuş A, Aktaş Ş, Tokatlı F (April 1, 2017) Baş Boyun Radyoterapisinde Farklı Tedavi Teknikleri İle Simultane Integre Boost Yönteminin Karşılaştırılması. Marmara Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 29 1 20–28.
IEEE
[1]B. Çoşkun, A. Y. Yahşi, A. Okumuş, Ş. Aktaş, and F. Tokatlı, “Baş Boyun Radyoterapisinde Farklı Tedavi Teknikleri İle Simultane Integre Boost Yönteminin Karşılaştırılması”, MAJPAS, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 20–28, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.7240/marufbd.306338.
ISNAD
Çoşkun, Bilgehan - Yahşi, Ayşe Yumak - Okumuş, Ayşe - Aktaş, Şahin - Tokatlı, Fusun. “Baş Boyun Radyoterapisinde Farklı Tedavi Teknikleri İle Simultane Integre Boost Yönteminin Karşılaştırılması”. Marmara Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 29/1 (April 1, 2017): 20-28. https://doi.org/10.7240/marufbd.306338.
JAMA
1.Çoşkun B, Yahşi AY, Okumuş A, Aktaş Ş, Tokatlı F. Baş Boyun Radyoterapisinde Farklı Tedavi Teknikleri İle Simultane Integre Boost Yönteminin Karşılaştırılması. MAJPAS. 2017;29:20–28.
MLA
Çoşkun, Bilgehan, et al. “Baş Boyun Radyoterapisinde Farklı Tedavi Teknikleri İle Simultane Integre Boost Yönteminin Karşılaştırılması”. Marmara Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 29, no. 1, Apr. 2017, pp. 20-28, doi:10.7240/marufbd.306338.
Vancouver
1.Bilgehan Çoşkun, Ayşe Yumak Yahşi, Ayşe Okumuş, Şahin Aktaş, Fusun Tokatlı. Baş Boyun Radyoterapisinde Farklı Tedavi Teknikleri İle Simultane Integre Boost Yönteminin Karşılaştırılması. MAJPAS. 2017 Apr. 1;29(1):20-8. doi:10.7240/marufbd.306338

Marmara Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences

e-ISSN : 2146-5150