Haber Çerçeveleme: Kuram ve Tipoloji

Abstract

Medya analizinde çerçeveleme kavramının giderek artan popülerliği, uygulamadaki önemli tutarsızlıklarla el ele gitmektedir. Bu makale, üretim, içerik ve medyakullanımı perspektiflerini kapsayan bütünleşik süreç modeli olarak çerçeveleme’ninana hatlarını ortaya koymaktadır. Medya çerçeveleri üzerine yapılmış çalışmalardan hareketle genel ve konuya özgü çerçeveler için bir tipoloji önerilmektedir. Haberlerdeki genel çerçevelerin nasıl belirlenebileceği ve haber içeriğindeülkelerarası farklılıkların anlaşılması için nasıl kullanılabileceği konusunda bir örnekverilmiştir. Makale, mevcut çerçeveleme araştırmalarındaki tartışmalı konuların belirlenmesiyle sonuçlandırılmıştır

Keywords

• Medya analizi, haber çerçeveleme, çerçeveleme tipolojisi, ülkelerarası haber

References

1. Althaus, S. L., Edy, J. A.&Phalen, P. F. (2001). Using substitutes for full-text news stories in content analysis: Which text is best? American Journal of Political Science, 45 (3), 707–723.
2. Bennett, W. L. (1996). News. The politics of illusion. New York: Longman.
3. Cappella, J. N.&Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism. The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Cohen, A. A.&Wolfseld, G. (Eds.), Framing the Intifada: People and the media. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5. Cooper, A. H. (2002). Media framing and social movement mobilization. German peace protest against INF missiles, the Gulf War and NATO peace enforcement in Bosnia. European Journal of Political Research, 41, 37–80.
6. D’Angelo, P. (2002). News framing as a multi-paradigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52, 870–888.
7. Deuze, M. (2002). Journalists in the Netherlands: An analysis of the people, the issues and the (inter-)national environment.
8. Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers. Durham, F. D. (1998). News frames as social narratives: TWA Flight 800. Journal of Communication, 48(4), 100–117.

9. Entman, R. B. (1991). Framing US coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41, 6–27.
10. Entman, R. B. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58.
11. Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Gamson, W. A. (1996). Media discourse as a framing resource. In A.N. Crigler (Ed.), The psychology of political communication (pp. 111–132). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
13. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1–37.
14. Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding what’s news. New York: Pantheon Books. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15. Hertog, J. K.&McLeod, D. M. (2001). A multiperspectival approach to framing analysis: A field guide. In S. D.
16. Reese, O.H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life(pp. 139–162).
17. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18. Jamieson, K. H. (1992). Dirty politics: Deception, distraction, and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Jasperson, A. E., Shah, D. V., Watts, M., Faber, R. J.&Fan, D. P. (1998). Framing the public agenda: Media effects on the importance of the federal budget deficit. Political Communication, 15, 205–224.
20. Kahneman, D. A., Tversky, A.&Slovic, P. (1984). Judgment under uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Köcher, R. (1986). Bloodhounds or missionaries: Role definitions of German and British journalists. European Journal of Communication, 1, 43–64.
22. Lawrence, R. (2000). Game-framing the issues: Tracking the strategy frame in public policy news. Political Communication, 17, 93–114.
23. Martin, C. R.&Oshagan, H. (1997). Disciplining the workforce: The news media frame a General Motors plant closing. Communication Research, 24, 669–697.
24. McManus, J. H. (1994). Market-driven journalism. Let the citizen beware. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Mendelson, M. (1993). Television frames in the 1988 Canadian election. Canadian Journal of Communication, 18, 149–171.
26. Neuman, W. R., Just, M. R.&Crigler, A. N. (1992). Common knowledge. News and the construction of political meaning. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Norris, P. (1995). The restless searchlight.
27. Network news framing of the post-cold war. Political Communication 12, 357–370.
28. Pan, Z.&Kosicki, G. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10, 59–79.
29. Patterson, T. E. (1993). Out of order. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Price, V.&Tewksbury, D. (1997).
30. Newsvalues and public opinion. A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication science (173–212). Greenwich. CT: Abiex
31. Price, V., Tewksbury, D.&Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought. The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24, 481–506.
32. Roessler, P. (2001). Between online heaven and cyberhell: The framing of the Internet by traditional media in Germany. New Media and & Society, 3, 49–66.
33. Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited. Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3, 297–316.
34. Semetko, H. A.&Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109.
35. Shah, D., Watts, M. D., Domke, D.&Fan, D. (2002). News framing and cueing of issue regimes. Explaining Clinton’s public approval in spite of scandal. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 339–370.
36. Shoemaker, P.&Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the Message. New York: Longman Publishers
37. Simon, A.&Xenos, M. (2000). Media framing and effective public deliberation. Political Communication, 17, 363–376
38. Sniderman, P. M.&Theriault, S. M. (2004). The dynamics of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In W. E. Saris, & P. Sniderman, P. (Eds.),
39. The Issue of belief: Essays in the intersection of non-attitudes and attitude change. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Snow, D. A.&Benford, R. D. (1992).
40. Master frames and cycles of protest. In A.D. Morris & C.M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41. Tankard, J. W. (2001). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy&A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life (pp.
42. 95–106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Terkildsen, N.&Schnell, F. (1997). How media frames move public opinion. An analysis of the women’s movement. Political Research Quarterly, 50, 879–900.
43. Tuchman, Gaye (1978) Making news. A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.
44. Valentino, N. A., Beckmann, M. N.&Buhr, T. A. (2001). A spiral for of cynicism for some: The contingent effects of campaign news frames on participation and confidence in government. Political Communication, 18, 347–367.
45. Vreese, C. H. de (2002). Framing Europe. Television news and European integration. Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers. Vreese, C. H. de (2003). Television reporting of second-order elections. Journalism Studies, 4, 183–198.
46. Vreese, C. H. de (2004). The effects of frames in political television news on audience perceptions of routine political news. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 36–52.
47. Vreese, C. H. de,&Boomgaarden, H. (2003). Valenced news frames and public support for the EU: Linking content analysis and experimental data. The European Journal of Communication, 3(4) 261–281.
48. Vreese, C. H. de, Peter, J.&Semetko, H. A. (2001). Framing politics at the launch of the euro: A cross-national comparative study of frames in the news. Political Communication, 18 (2), 107–122.
49. Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press