Research Article

Immobilization after pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture surgery: Cast or splint?

Volume: 35 Number: 2 May 30, 2022
  • Ahmet Hamdi Akgulle
  • Evrim Sırın
  • Ozgur Baysal
  • Murat Polat
  • Yavuz Sahbat *
  • Bulent Erol
EN

Immobilization after pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture surgery: Cast or splint?

Abstract

Objective: While surgical treatment is the most accepted treatment method for displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children, there is little data about immobilization method after surgery. The aim of the study is to determine whether there is any difference in preventing loss of reduction between long-arm cast and long-arm splint following pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture surgery.

Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of pediatric patients with supracondylar humerus fractures treated operatively between 2012 and 2019 at a university hospital. According to Skaggs criteria, early postoperative and 3rd-week follow-up X-rays were evaluated for the loss of reduction (LOR). Postoperative immobilization method; splint or cast was compared in the context of LOR.

Results: Cast immobilization was found to be superior in preventing LOR in the first three weeks postoperatively (p˂0.05). There was no significant difference for other factors like fracture configuration, patient age and surgical technique.

Conclusion: Cast immobilization is superior to splint immobilization in preventing radiologic LOR after pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture surgery however, clinical relevance of this conclusion is yet to be proved. Keywords: Supracondylar humerus fracture, Postoperative immobilization, Loss of reduction

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Otsuka NY, Kasser JR. Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1997;5:19-26. doi: 10.5435/00124.635.199701000-00003
  2. [2] Shrader MW. Pediatric supracondylar fractures and pediatric physeal elbow fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 2008 ;39:163- 71. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2007.12.005.
  3. [3] Farnsworth CL, Silva PD, Mubarak SJ. Etiology of supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 1998;18:38-42. PMID: 9449099
  4. [4] Pennock AT, Charles M, Moor M, et al. Potential causes of loss of reduction in supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 2014;34:691-7. doi: 10.1097/BPO.000.000.0000000154.
  5. [5] Sankar WN, Hebela NM, Skaggs DL, at al. Loss of pin fixation in displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children: causes and prevention. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:713- 7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00076
  6. [6] Lewine E, Kim JM, Miller PE, et al. Closed versus open supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children: a comparison of clinical and radiographic presentation and results. J Pediatr Orthop 2018;38:77-81. doi: 10.1097/ BPO.000.000.0000000769.
  7. [7] Balasubramanian Balakumar VM. A retrospective analysis of loss of reduction in operated supracondylar humerus fractures. Indian J Orthop 2012;46:690-7. doi:10.4103/0019- 5413.104219.
  8. [8] Bahk MS, Srikumaran U, Ain MC, et al. Patterns of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 2008;28:493-9. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e31817bb860

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Clinical Sciences

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

May 30, 2022

Submission Date

September 12, 2021

Acceptance Date

January 23, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 35 Number: 2

APA
Akgulle, A. H., Sırın, E., Baysal, O., Polat, M., Sahbat, Y., & Erol, B. (2022). Immobilization after pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture surgery: Cast or splint? Marmara Medical Journal, 35(2), 121-126. https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.1089683
AMA
1.Akgulle AH, Sırın E, Baysal O, Polat M, Sahbat Y, Erol B. Immobilization after pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture surgery: Cast or splint? Marmara Med J. 2022;35(2):121-126. doi:10.5472/marumj.1089683
Chicago
Akgulle, Ahmet Hamdi, Evrim Sırın, Ozgur Baysal, Murat Polat, Yavuz Sahbat, and Bulent Erol. 2022. “Immobilization After Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture Surgery: Cast or Splint?”. Marmara Medical Journal 35 (2): 121-26. https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.1089683.
EndNote
Akgulle AH, Sırın E, Baysal O, Polat M, Sahbat Y, Erol B (May 1, 2022) Immobilization after pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture surgery: Cast or splint? Marmara Medical Journal 35 2 121–126.
IEEE
[1]A. H. Akgulle, E. Sırın, O. Baysal, M. Polat, Y. Sahbat, and B. Erol, “Immobilization after pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture surgery: Cast or splint?”, Marmara Med J, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 121–126, May 2022, doi: 10.5472/marumj.1089683.
ISNAD
Akgulle, Ahmet Hamdi - Sırın, Evrim - Baysal, Ozgur - Polat, Murat - Sahbat, Yavuz - Erol, Bulent. “Immobilization After Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture Surgery: Cast or Splint?”. Marmara Medical Journal 35/2 (May 1, 2022): 121-126. https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.1089683.
JAMA
1.Akgulle AH, Sırın E, Baysal O, Polat M, Sahbat Y, Erol B. Immobilization after pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture surgery: Cast or splint? Marmara Med J. 2022;35:121–126.
MLA
Akgulle, Ahmet Hamdi, et al. “Immobilization After Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture Surgery: Cast or Splint?”. Marmara Medical Journal, vol. 35, no. 2, May 2022, pp. 121-6, doi:10.5472/marumj.1089683.
Vancouver
1.Ahmet Hamdi Akgulle, Evrim Sırın, Ozgur Baysal, Murat Polat, Yavuz Sahbat, Bulent Erol. Immobilization after pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture surgery: Cast or splint? Marmara Med J. 2022 May 1;35(2):121-6. doi:10.5472/marumj.1089683