Assessment of macular microcirculation in patients with multiple sclerosis by swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography

Year 2024, , 192 - 197, 31.05.2024

Serhat Eker , Yalçın Karaküçük , Haluk Gumus

https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.1487767

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the changes in the retinal microcirculation in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients by swept-source optical
coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA).
Patients and Methods: Thirty-seven patients with relapsing-remitting MS and 40 healthy volunteers were included into this crosssectional
study. Clinical history, Expanded Disability Status Scale and duration of MS were collected. SS-OCTA by deep range imaging
(DRI) OCT measurements were performed on all subjects. Macular perfusion parameters including superficial and deep foveal
avascular zones (FAZs, FAZd, respectively) (%), vascular densities of superficial capillary plexus (SCP) (%), deep capillary plexus
(DCP) (%) and choriocapillaris (CC) (%) were compared with healthy subjects.
Results: Vascular densities of SCP, DCP and CC were found to be statistically lower in the study group compared to the control group
(p = 0.02, p = 0.03, p = 0.03, respectively). FAZs and FAZd, areas were significantly higher in the study group (p = 0.02, p = 0.02,
respectively). Central macular thickness and subfoveal choroidal thickness were significantly lower than in the control group (p =
0.015, p = 0.047, respectively).
Conclusion: Evaluation of retinal blood flow in patients with MS is useful both for understanding the physiopathology of the disease
and in the clinical follow-up.

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis, Retinal vasculature, Vascular density, Macular perfusion, Swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography

References

• Dobson R, Giovannoni G. Multiple sclerosis – a review. Eur J Neurol 2019; 26: 27-40. doi: 10.1111/ene.13819.
• Coles A. Multiple sclerosis. Pract Neurol 2009; 9: 118-126. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.171132.
• Alshammari YHM, Aldoghmi AKB, Al Afif HSA, et al. Multiple sclerosis diagnosis and management: A simple literature review. Arch Pharma Pract 2019; 10: 33-7.
• Goldenberg MM. Multiple sclerosis review. P T 2012; 37: 175- 84.
• Lublin FD, Reingold SC, Cohen JA, et al. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: the 2013 revisions. Neurology 2014; 15;83: 278-86. doi: 10.1212/WNL.000.000.0000000560.
• Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17: 162-73. doi: 10.1016/S1474- 4422(17)30470-2.
• Huang W-J, Chen W-W, Zhang X. Multiple sclerosis: Pathology, diagnosis and treatments. Exp Ther Med 2017; 13: 3163-6. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4410.
• Plumb J, McQuaid S, Mirakhur M, Kirk J. Abnormal endothelial tight junctions in active lesions and normalappearing white matter in multiple sclerosis. Brain Pathol 2002; 12: 154-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2002.tb00430.x.
• Inglese M, Adhya S, Johnson G, et al. Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging correlates of neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2008; 28: 164-71. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600504.
• Holland CM, Charil A, Csapo I, et al. The relationship between normal cerebral perfusion patterns and white matter lesion distribution in 1,249 patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging 2012; 22: 129-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1552- 6569.2011.00585.x.
• Yilmaz H, Ersoy A, Icel E. Assessments of vessel density and foveal avascular zone metrics in multiple sclerosis: an optical coherence tomography angiography study. Eye (Lond) 2020; 34: 771-8. doi: 10.1038/s41433.019.0746-y.
• Lanzillo R, Cennamo G, Criscuolo C, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography retinal vascular network assessment in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2018; 24: 1706-14. doi: 10.1177/135.245.8517729463.
• Wang X, Jia Y, Spain R, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography of optic nerve head and parafovea in multiple sclerosis. Br J Ophthalmol 2014; 98: 1368-73. doi: 10.1136/ bjophthalmol-2013-304547.
• Turgut B. Optical coherence tomography angiography–a general view. Eur Ophthalmic Rev 2016; 10: 39-42.
• Wylegala A, Teper S, Dobrowolski D, Wylegala E. Optical coherence angiography: A review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95: e4907. doi: 10.1097/MD.000.000.0000004907.
• Cordon B, Vilades E, Orduna E, et al. Angiography with optical coherence tomography as a biomarker in multiple sclerosis. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0243236. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0243236.
• Lee GI, Park KA, Oh SY, Min JH, Kim BJ. Differential patterns of parafoveal and peripapillary vessel density in multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2021; 49: 102780. doi: 10.1016/j. msard.2021.102780.
• Kashani AH, Chen C-L, Gahm JK, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography: A comprehensive review of current methods and clinical applications. Prog Retin Eye Res 2017; 60: 66-100. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.07.002.
• Al-Sheikh M, Ghasemi Falavarjani K, Akil H, Sadda SR. Impact of image quality on OCT angiography based quantitative measurements. Int J Retina Vitreous 2017; 3: 13. doi: 10.1186/ s40942.017.0068-9.
• Heavner W, Pevny L. Eye development and retinogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2012; 4: a008391. doi: 10.1101/ cshperspect.a008391.
• Pellegrini M, Vagge A, Ferro Desideri L, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography in neurodegenerative disorders. J Clin Med 2020; 9: 1706. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061706.
• D’Haeseleer M, Cambron M, Vanopdenbosch L, De Keyser J. Vascular aspects of multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2011; 10: 657-66. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70105-3.
• Petzold A, Balcer LJ, Calabresi PA, et al. Retinal layer segmentation in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2017; 16: 797-812. doi: 10.1016/ S1474-4422(17)30278-8.