IMPRESSION CYTOLOGY (IC) IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

Volume: 13 Number: 2 December 3, 2016
  • Tarık Şapçı
  • Ahmet Karavuş
  • Hale Onmuş
  • Melda Karavuş
  • Uğur Günter Akbulut
EN

IMPRESSION CYTOLOGY (IC) IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

Abstract

Objective: Nasal cytology is the most useful technique in differentiating infectious rhinitis from other types of rhinitis. Various techniques have been described for obtaining nasal cytology specimens, including blowing secretions into wax paper; taking a smear by using cotton wool swabs or brushes; or performing nasal scraping, lavage, biopsy and impression cytology.
We aimed to compare impression cytology findings between allergic, vasomotor and infectious rhinitis patients and the control group as far as eosinophils, neutrophils, basophilic cell, goblet cells and bacteria counts were concerned.
Material and Method: In this study, we used an alternative method, namely Impression Cytology (1C) which is a noninvasive diagnostic procedure allowing the collection of a monolayer of cells from the epithelial or mucous surface. 1C was used in 28 allergic rhinitis, 21 vasomotor rhinitis and 23 infectious rhinitis patients. There were 22 control subjects in this study.
Results: IC was found to show significantly higher gradings of eosinophil counts and goblet cell counts in allergic rhinitis patients as
compared to other groups (p<0.001); whereas neutrophil counts were found to be higher in the infectious rhinitis patients as compared to other groups (p<0.001). In the basophilic cell counts allergic rhinitis and the infectious rhinitis patients were found to present higher gradings as compared to the control group (p<0.05). Bacteria invasion detected by IC was present only in the infectious rhinitis patients with a percentage of
26.1.
Conclusion: Our study has shown that IC is a very valuable and practical technique, offering a valuable alternative test for investigating cytology in all rhinitis and other pathologies causing cytologic changes.
Key Words: Impression cytology, rhinitis,
eosinophil, basophilic cell, neutrophil.

References

  1. Meitzer EO, Schatz M, Zeiger RS. Allergic and non-allergic rhinitis. In: Middleton E Jr, Reed CE, Ellis EE (Eds). AllergyO Principles and Practice, 3rd ed. CV Mosby, St Louis, 1988; 1253-1289.
  2. Egbert PR, Laube S, Maurice DM. A simple conjunctival biopsy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1977;84:798-801.
  3. Thatcher RW, Darougar S, Jones B. Conjunctival impression cytology. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95:678-681.
  4. C in clinical practice
  5. Şapçı T. Gürda! C, Onmuş H, et al. Diagnostic significance of impression cytology in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Am J Rhinology 1999;13:31-35.
  6. Meltzer EO, Orgel tlA, Jalowayski A. nasal
  7. Cytology. In: naclerio RM, Durham SR, Myglnd n (Eds). Rhinitis: Mechanisms and
  8. management. Marcel Dekker Inc, new York, 1998:175-202.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Tarık Şapçı This is me

Ahmet Karavuş This is me

Hale Onmuş This is me

Melda Karavuş This is me

Uğur Günter Akbulut This is me

Publication Date

December 3, 2016

Submission Date

May 2, 2016

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2000 Volume: 13 Number: 2

APA
Şapçı, T., Karavuş, A., Onmuş, H., Karavuş, M., & Akbulut, U. G. (2016). IMPRESSION CYTOLOGY (IC) IN CLINICAL PRACTICE. Marmara Medical Journal, 13(2), 75-81. https://izlik.org/JA87TA72LF
AMA
1.Şapçı T, Karavuş A, Onmuş H, Karavuş M, Akbulut UG. IMPRESSION CYTOLOGY (IC) IN CLINICAL PRACTICE. Marmara Med J. 2016;13(2):75-81. https://izlik.org/JA87TA72LF
Chicago
Şapçı, Tarık, Ahmet Karavuş, Hale Onmuş, Melda Karavuş, and Uğur Günter Akbulut. 2016. “IMPRESSION CYTOLOGY (IC) IN CLINICAL PRACTICE”. Marmara Medical Journal 13 (2): 75-81. https://izlik.org/JA87TA72LF.
EndNote
Şapçı T, Karavuş A, Onmuş H, Karavuş M, Akbulut UG (June 1, 2016) IMPRESSION CYTOLOGY (IC) IN CLINICAL PRACTICE. Marmara Medical Journal 13 2 75–81.
IEEE
[1]T. Şapçı, A. Karavuş, H. Onmuş, M. Karavuş, and U. G. Akbulut, “IMPRESSION CYTOLOGY (IC) IN CLINICAL PRACTICE”, Marmara Med J, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 75–81, June 2016, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA87TA72LF
ISNAD
Şapçı, Tarık - Karavuş, Ahmet - Onmuş, Hale - Karavuş, Melda - Akbulut, Uğur Günter. “IMPRESSION CYTOLOGY (IC) IN CLINICAL PRACTICE”. Marmara Medical Journal 13/2 (June 1, 2016): 75-81. https://izlik.org/JA87TA72LF.
JAMA
1.Şapçı T, Karavuş A, Onmuş H, Karavuş M, Akbulut UG. IMPRESSION CYTOLOGY (IC) IN CLINICAL PRACTICE. Marmara Med J. 2016;13:75–81.
MLA
Şapçı, Tarık, et al. “IMPRESSION CYTOLOGY (IC) IN CLINICAL PRACTICE”. Marmara Medical Journal, vol. 13, no. 2, June 2016, pp. 75-81, https://izlik.org/JA87TA72LF.
Vancouver
1.Tarık Şapçı, Ahmet Karavuş, Hale Onmuş, Melda Karavuş, Uğur Günter Akbulut. IMPRESSION CYTOLOGY (IC) IN CLINICAL PRACTICE. Marmara Med J [Internet]. 2016 Jun. 1;13(2):75-81. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA87TA72LF