BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2004, Volume: 17 Issue: 2, 81 - 83, 29.06.2015
https://izlik.org/JA59MD55FL

Abstract

-

References

  • Samuel PY, Sanjay I, Bidichandia L, et al.
  • Molecular analysis of deletion (17)(p11.2;p11.2)in
  • a family segregating a 17p paracentric inversion:
  • implications for carriers of paracentric inversions.
  • Am J Hum Genet 1995; 60:1184-1193.
  • Ligon AH, Beaudet AL, Shaffer LG. Simultaneous
  • multilocus FISH analysis for detection of
  • microdeletions in the diagnostic evaluation of
  • developmental delay and mental retardation. Am J
  • Hum Genet 1997; 61:51-59.
  • Trask BJ, Mefford H, van den Engh G, et al.
  • Quantification by flow cytometry of chromosome
  • deletions in Smith-Magenis syndrome patients.
  • Hum Genet 1966; 98:710-718.
  • Seranski P, Heis NS, Dhorne-Pollet S, et al.
  • Transcription mapping in a medulloblastoma
  • breakpoint interval and Smith-Magenis syndrome
  • candidate region: identification of p53
  • transcriptional units and new candidate genes.
  • Genomics 1999; 56:1-11.
  • Seabright M. A rapid banding technique for human
  • chromosomes. Lancet 1971; 2:971-972.
  • Dutrillaux B, Viegas-Peguignot E. High resolution
  • R and G banding on the same preparation. Hum
  • Genet 1981; 57:93-95.
  • Sumner AT. A simple technique for human
  • demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp
  • Cell Res 1972; 75:304-306.
  • Acar H, Connor M J. Detection of trisomy 12 and
  • centromeric alteration in CLL by interphase and
  • metaphase FISH. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1998;
  • :148-151.
  • Acar H, Stewart J Boyd, Connor MJ. Identification
  • of variant translocations in chronic myeloid
  • leukemia by FISH. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1997;
  • :115-118.
  • Kuwano A, Ledbetter SA, Dobyns NB, Emanuel
  • BS, Ledbetter DH. Detection of deletions and
  • criptic translocations in Miller-Dieker syndrome by
  • in situ hybridization. Am J Hum Genet 1991;
  • :707-714.
  • Juyal RC, Figuera LE, Hauge X, et al. Molecular
  • analysis of 17p11.2 deletions in 62 Smith-Magenis
  • syndrome patients. Am J Hum Genet 1996; 58:998-
  • -

17P PERİSENTRİK İNVERSİYONLU BİR AİLE: TAŞIYICILARA UYARILAR

Year 2004, Volume: 17 Issue: 2, 81 - 83, 29.06.2015
https://izlik.org/JA59MD55FL

Abstract

İleri anne yaşı ve üçlü testte 1/14 risk ile Down sendromu düşünülen gebeliğe 19. haftasında amniyosentez uygulandı. Fetusun kromozom analizi sonucu karyotipi 46,XX,inv (17) (p11.2;q25.1) olarak belirlendi. Sitogenetik olarak tespit edilen bu kromozomal kırık noktası mikrodelesyon sendromu olan Smith-Magenis sendromu ile ilişkili olabileceği için, Smith Magenis probu kullanılarak FISH yöntemi uygulandı. Delesyon olmadığı ve familyal inversiyon 17 olduğu tesbit edilerek gebeliğe devam edildi ve sağlıklı bir bebek doğdu. Bu bulguların ışığı altında, perisentrik inversiyon taşıyıcılarının prenatal genetik danışmasının önemli olabileceği dikkate alınmalıdır. Bu makalede, FISH yönteminin prenatal olarak inversiyon sonucu kromozom 17'de oluşabilecek mikrodelesyon ve yeniden düzenlenmelerin analizi açısından güvenilir olduğu vurgulanmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Kromozom 17, Perisentrik inversiyon, Fluoresans in situ hibridizasyon

References

  • Samuel PY, Sanjay I, Bidichandia L, et al.
  • Molecular analysis of deletion (17)(p11.2;p11.2)in
  • a family segregating a 17p paracentric inversion:
  • implications for carriers of paracentric inversions.
  • Am J Hum Genet 1995; 60:1184-1193.
  • Ligon AH, Beaudet AL, Shaffer LG. Simultaneous
  • multilocus FISH analysis for detection of
  • microdeletions in the diagnostic evaluation of
  • developmental delay and mental retardation. Am J
  • Hum Genet 1997; 61:51-59.
  • Trask BJ, Mefford H, van den Engh G, et al.
  • Quantification by flow cytometry of chromosome
  • deletions in Smith-Magenis syndrome patients.
  • Hum Genet 1966; 98:710-718.
  • Seranski P, Heis NS, Dhorne-Pollet S, et al.
  • Transcription mapping in a medulloblastoma
  • breakpoint interval and Smith-Magenis syndrome
  • candidate region: identification of p53
  • transcriptional units and new candidate genes.
  • Genomics 1999; 56:1-11.
  • Seabright M. A rapid banding technique for human
  • chromosomes. Lancet 1971; 2:971-972.
  • Dutrillaux B, Viegas-Peguignot E. High resolution
  • R and G banding on the same preparation. Hum
  • Genet 1981; 57:93-95.
  • Sumner AT. A simple technique for human
  • demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp
  • Cell Res 1972; 75:304-306.
  • Acar H, Connor M J. Detection of trisomy 12 and
  • centromeric alteration in CLL by interphase and
  • metaphase FISH. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1998;
  • :148-151.
  • Acar H, Stewart J Boyd, Connor MJ. Identification
  • of variant translocations in chronic myeloid
  • leukemia by FISH. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1997;
  • :115-118.
  • Kuwano A, Ledbetter SA, Dobyns NB, Emanuel
  • BS, Ledbetter DH. Detection of deletions and
  • criptic translocations in Miller-Dieker syndrome by
  • in situ hybridization. Am J Hum Genet 1991;
  • :707-714.
  • Juyal RC, Figuera LE, Hauge X, et al. Molecular
  • analysis of 17p11.2 deletions in 62 Smith-Magenis
  • syndrome patients. Am J Hum Genet 1996; 58:998-
  • -
There are 45 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Authors

Gülseren Bağcı This is me

Özgül Alper This is me

Anne Hagemeijer This is me

Hasan Acar This is me

Elizabeth Smit This is me

Mine Üner This is me

Güven Lüleci This is me

Publication Date June 29, 2015
IZ https://izlik.org/JA59MD55FL
Published in Issue Year 2004 Volume: 17 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Bağcı, G., Alper, Ö., Hagemeijer, A., Acar, H., Smit, E., Üner, M., & Lüleci, G. (2015). 17P PERİSENTRİK İNVERSİYONLU BİR AİLE: TAŞIYICILARA UYARILAR. Marmara Medical Journal, 17(2), 81-83. https://izlik.org/JA59MD55FL
AMA 1.Bağcı G, Alper Ö, Hagemeijer A, et al. 17P PERİSENTRİK İNVERSİYONLU BİR AİLE: TAŞIYICILARA UYARILAR. Marmara Med J. 2015;17(2):81-83. https://izlik.org/JA59MD55FL
Chicago Bağcı, Gülseren, Özgül Alper, Anne Hagemeijer, et al. 2015. “17P PERİSENTRİK İNVERSİYONLU BİR AİLE: TAŞIYICILARA UYARILAR”. Marmara Medical Journal 17 (2): 81-83. https://izlik.org/JA59MD55FL.
EndNote Bağcı G, Alper Ö, Hagemeijer A, Acar H, Smit E, Üner M, Lüleci G (August 1, 2015) 17P PERİSENTRİK İNVERSİYONLU BİR AİLE: TAŞIYICILARA UYARILAR. Marmara Medical Journal 17 2 81–83.
IEEE [1]G. Bağcı et al., “17P PERİSENTRİK İNVERSİYONLU BİR AİLE: TAŞIYICILARA UYARILAR”, Marmara Med J, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 81–83, Aug. 2015, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA59MD55FL
ISNAD Bağcı, Gülseren - Alper, Özgül - Hagemeijer, Anne - Acar, Hasan - Smit, Elizabeth - Üner, Mine - Lüleci, Güven. “17P PERİSENTRİK İNVERSİYONLU BİR AİLE: TAŞIYICILARA UYARILAR”. Marmara Medical Journal 17/2 (August 1, 2015): 81-83. https://izlik.org/JA59MD55FL.
JAMA 1.Bağcı G, Alper Ö, Hagemeijer A, Acar H, Smit E, Üner M, Lüleci G. 17P PERİSENTRİK İNVERSİYONLU BİR AİLE: TAŞIYICILARA UYARILAR. Marmara Med J. 2015;17:81–83.
MLA Bağcı, Gülseren, et al. “17P PERİSENTRİK İNVERSİYONLU BİR AİLE: TAŞIYICILARA UYARILAR”. Marmara Medical Journal, vol. 17, no. 2, Aug. 2015, pp. 81-83, https://izlik.org/JA59MD55FL.
Vancouver 1.Gülseren Bağcı, Özgül Alper, Anne Hagemeijer, Hasan Acar, Elizabeth Smit, Mine Üner, Güven Lüleci. 17P PERİSENTRİK İNVERSİYONLU BİR AİLE: TAŞIYICILARA UYARILAR. Marmara Med J [Internet]. 2015 Aug. 1;17(2):81-3. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA59MD55FL