Intravenous dıgıtal substractıon angıography versus conventıonal angıography for evaluatıng lıvıng renal donors

K. Bircan; İ. Başar; A. Esen; R Özyavuz; İ. Erkan; Ü Yasavul; Ç Turgan; M Bakkaloğlu

Research Article

Year 1990, Volume: 3 Issue: 4, 183 - 184, 01.12.1990

K. Bircan İ. Başar A. Esen R Özyavuz İ. Erkan Ü Yasavul Ç Turgan M Bakkaloğlu

Abstract

Intravenous dıgıtal substractıon angıography versus conventıonal angıography for evaluatıng lıvıng renal donors

Year 1990, Volume: 3 Issue: 4, 183 - 184, 01.12.1990

K. Bircan İ. Başar A. Esen R Özyavuz İ. Erkan Ü Yasavul Ç Turgan M Bakkaloğlu

Abstract

The angiograms of 40 nephrectomised donors operated at the Department of Urology. Hacettepe University Hospital, were evaluated retrospectively.

It was found that in 84 % of donors who underwent intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IV-DSA) and in 76 % of patients who underwent conventional aortography and selective renal angiography (CA) the estimations for renal arterial anatomy preoperative - ly were correct. The accuracy of the two techniques for predicting the renal arterial status did not differ statistically. It was concluded that as IV-DSA is a non- invasive method, it should be the procedure of choice for evaluating living renal donors.

Keywords

Angiography, Living renal donor

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Subjects	Clinical Sciences
Journal Section	Articles
Authors	K. Bircan This is me İ. Başar This is me A. Esen This is me R Özyavuz This is me İ. Erkan This is me Ü Yasavul This is me Ç Turgan This is me M Bakkaloğlu This is me
Publication Date	December 1, 1990
Published in Issue	Year 1990 Volume: 3 Issue: 4

Cite

APA	Bircan, K., Başar, İ., Esen, A., Özyavuz, R., et al. (1990). Intravenous dıgıtal substractıon angıography versus conventıonal angıography for evaluatıng lıvıng renal donors. Marmara Medical Journal, 3(4), 183-184.
AMA	Bircan K, Başar İ, Esen A, Özyavuz R, Erkan İ, Yasavul Ü, Turgan Ç, Bakkaloğlu M. Intravenous dıgıtal substractıon angıography versus conventıonal angıography for evaluatıng lıvıng renal donors. Marmara Med J. December 1990;3(4):183-184.
Chicago	Bircan, K., İ. Başar, A. Esen, R Özyavuz, İ. Erkan, Ü Yasavul, Ç Turgan, and M Bakkaloğlu. “Intravenous dıgıtal substractıon angıography Versus conventıonal angıography for evaluatıng lıvıng Renal Donors”. Marmara Medical Journal 3, no. 4 (December 1990): 183-84.
EndNote	Bircan K, Başar İ, Esen A, Özyavuz R, Erkan İ, Yasavul Ü, Turgan Ç, Bakkaloğlu M (December 1, 1990) Intravenous dıgıtal substractıon angıography versus conventıonal angıography for evaluatıng lıvıng renal donors. Marmara Medical Journal 3 4 183–184.
IEEE	K. Bircan, İ. Başar, A. Esen, R. Özyavuz, İ. Erkan, Ü. Yasavul, Ç. Turgan, and M. Bakkaloğlu, “Intravenous dıgıtal substractıon angıography versus conventıonal angıography for evaluatıng lıvıng renal donors”, Marmara Med J, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 183–184, 1990.
ISNAD	Bircan, K. et al. “Intravenous dıgıtal substractıon angıography Versus conventıonal angıography for evaluatıng lıvıng Renal Donors”. Marmara Medical Journal 3/4 (December 1990), 183-184.
JAMA	Bircan K, Başar İ, Esen A, Özyavuz R, Erkan İ, Yasavul Ü, Turgan Ç, Bakkaloğlu M. Intravenous dıgıtal substractıon angıography versus conventıonal angıography for evaluatıng lıvıng renal donors. Marmara Med J. 1990;3:183–184.
MLA	Bircan, K. et al. “Intravenous dıgıtal substractıon angıography Versus conventıonal angıography for evaluatıng lıvıng Renal Donors”. Marmara Medical Journal, vol. 3, no. 4, 1990, pp. 183-4.
Vancouver	Bircan K, Başar İ, Esen A, Özyavuz R, Erkan İ, Yasavul Ü, Turgan Ç, Bakkaloğlu M. Intravenous dıgıtal substractıon angıography versus conventıonal angıography for evaluatıng lıvıng renal donors. Marmara Med J. 1990;3(4):183-4.