Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Effects of transverse and longitudinal venotomies of recipient microveins on patency rates in end - to - side microvenous anastomosis

Year 1995, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 126 - 131, 01.07.1995

Abstract

As diameter of microvessel becomes smaller in end- to-side anastomosis, some problems in the maintenance of patency may accompany the process.

Transverse and longitudinal venotomies were performed onto the femoral veins of rats, as recipient vessels, to create spaces for appropriate anastomoses with superficial eqigastric veins as donor vessels. The patency rates were assessed and compared on the 7th and 21 st days.

In spite of differences in clamping and anastomosis times and number of sutures, the patency rates have been observed as 100 % in both groups, in the early postoperative period. But, in the late postoperative period, the results have differred in patency rates in favor of transverse venotomy group.

This method, similar to the studies about micro- arterial anastomosis, can be considered as an appropriate technique of end-to-side microvenous anastomosis in clinical practice, because of its high patency rate, reduced operation time and decrease in the number of sutures.

References

  • Linton RR, Menendez CV. Arterial Homografts: A comparison of the results with end-to-side anastomoses. Ann Surg 1955; 142:568-572.
Year 1995, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 126 - 131, 01.07.1995

Abstract

References

  • Linton RR, Menendez CV. Arterial Homografts: A comparison of the results with end-to-side anastomoses. Ann Surg 1955; 142:568-572.
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Subjects Clinical Sciences
Journal Section Review Makaleler
Authors

F. Peker This is me

N. Durak This is me

F. Yüksel This is me

A. Özdemir This is me

L. Baş This is me

İ. Öztek This is me

E. Kışlaoğlu This is me

Publication Date July 1, 1995
Published in Issue Year 1995 Volume: 8 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Peker, F., Durak, N., Yüksel, F., Özdemir, A., et al. (1995). Effects of transverse and longitudinal venotomies of recipient microveins on patency rates in end - to - side microvenous anastomosis. Marmara Medical Journal, 8(3), 126-131.
AMA Peker F, Durak N, Yüksel F, Özdemir A, Baş L, Öztek İ, Kışlaoğlu E. Effects of transverse and longitudinal venotomies of recipient microveins on patency rates in end - to - side microvenous anastomosis. Marmara Med J. July 1995;8(3):126-131.
Chicago Peker, F., N. Durak, F. Yüksel, A. Özdemir, L. Baş, İ. Öztek, and E. Kışlaoğlu. “Effects of Transverse and Longitudinal Venotomies of Recipient Microveins on Patency Rates in End - to - Side Microvenous Anastomosis”. Marmara Medical Journal 8, no. 3 (July 1995): 126-31.
EndNote Peker F, Durak N, Yüksel F, Özdemir A, Baş L, Öztek İ, Kışlaoğlu E (July 1, 1995) Effects of transverse and longitudinal venotomies of recipient microveins on patency rates in end - to - side microvenous anastomosis. Marmara Medical Journal 8 3 126–131.
IEEE F. Peker, N. Durak, F. Yüksel, A. Özdemir, L. Baş, İ. Öztek, and E. Kışlaoğlu, “Effects of transverse and longitudinal venotomies of recipient microveins on patency rates in end - to - side microvenous anastomosis”, Marmara Med J, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 126–131, 1995.
ISNAD Peker, F. et al. “Effects of Transverse and Longitudinal Venotomies of Recipient Microveins on Patency Rates in End - to - Side Microvenous Anastomosis”. Marmara Medical Journal 8/3 (July 1995), 126-131.
JAMA Peker F, Durak N, Yüksel F, Özdemir A, Baş L, Öztek İ, Kışlaoğlu E. Effects of transverse and longitudinal venotomies of recipient microveins on patency rates in end - to - side microvenous anastomosis. Marmara Med J. 1995;8:126–131.
MLA Peker, F. et al. “Effects of Transverse and Longitudinal Venotomies of Recipient Microveins on Patency Rates in End - to - Side Microvenous Anastomosis”. Marmara Medical Journal, vol. 8, no. 3, 1995, pp. 126-31.
Vancouver Peker F, Durak N, Yüksel F, Özdemir A, Baş L, Öztek İ, Kışlaoğlu E. Effects of transverse and longitudinal venotomies of recipient microveins on patency rates in end - to - side microvenous anastomosis. Marmara Med J. 1995;8(3):126-31.