Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Comparison of the histopathological evaluation of pre and postmenopausal women using dilatation and curettage and the pipelle biopsy device

Year 1996, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 15 - 17, 01.01.1996

N. Aka E. Balkan E. Z. Tuzcular Vural K. Kuşçu Ö. Peker M. Erkan

Abstract

Outpatient endometrial sampling, using the Pipelle endometrial biopsy device, is an alternative procedure for dilatation of the cervix and curettage (D&C). In this study we compared the reliability of the Pipelle with D&C, in women with pre and post menopausal bleeding and 90.3 % was considered to be successful. Insufficent material was obtained in

22.6 % of cases with Pipelle whereas with D&C 12.9% provided inadequate tissue. The Pipelle is associated with minimal pain, haemorrage, does not require anesthesia and is much cheaper, acceptable and convenient for most patients. Our results show that this method can be used for outpatient endometrial sampling

Keywords

Endometrial biopsy Pipelle Postmenopausal bleeding

References

  • Stoval TO, Ling FW, Morgan PL. A prospective randomised comparison of the Pipelle endometrial sampling device with the Movak curette. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165:1287- 1289.

Year 1996, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 15 - 17, 01.01.1996

N. Aka E. Balkan E. Z. Tuzcular Vural K. Kuşçu Ö. Peker M. Erkan

Abstract

References

  • Stoval TO, Ling FW, Morgan PL. A prospective randomised comparison of the Pipelle endometrial sampling device with the Movak curette. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165:1287- 1289.
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Subjects Clinical Sciences
Journal Section Review Makaleler
Authors

N. Aka This is me

E. Balkan This is me

E. Z. Tuzcular Vural This is me

K. Kuşçu This is me

Ö. Peker This is me

M. Erkan This is me

Publication Date January 1, 1996
Published in Issue Year 1996 Volume: 9 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Aka, N., Balkan, E., Tuzcular Vural, E. Z., Kuşçu, K., et al. (1996). Comparison of the histopathological evaluation of pre and postmenopausal women using dilatation and curettage and the pipelle biopsy device. Marmara Medical Journal, 9(1), 15-17.
AMA Aka N, Balkan E, Tuzcular Vural EZ, Kuşçu K, Peker Ö, Erkan M. Comparison of the histopathological evaluation of pre and postmenopausal women using dilatation and curettage and the pipelle biopsy device. Marmara Med J. January 1996;9(1):15-17.
Chicago Aka, N., E. Balkan, E. Z. Tuzcular Vural, K. Kuşçu, Ö. Peker, and M. Erkan. “Comparison of the Histopathological Evaluation of Pre and Postmenopausal Women Using Dilatation and Curettage and the Pipelle Biopsy Device”. Marmara Medical Journal 9, no. 1 (January 1996): 15-17.
EndNote Aka N, Balkan E, Tuzcular Vural EZ, Kuşçu K, Peker Ö, Erkan M (January 1, 1996) Comparison of the histopathological evaluation of pre and postmenopausal women using dilatation and curettage and the pipelle biopsy device. Marmara Medical Journal 9 1 15–17.
IEEE N. Aka, E. Balkan, E. Z. Tuzcular Vural, K. Kuşçu, Ö. Peker, and M. Erkan, “Comparison of the histopathological evaluation of pre and postmenopausal women using dilatation and curettage and the pipelle biopsy device”, Marmara Med J, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 15–17, 1996.
ISNAD Aka, N. et al. “Comparison of the Histopathological Evaluation of Pre and Postmenopausal Women Using Dilatation and Curettage and the Pipelle Biopsy Device”. Marmara Medical Journal 9/1 (January 1996), 15-17.
JAMA Aka N, Balkan E, Tuzcular Vural EZ, Kuşçu K, Peker Ö, Erkan M. Comparison of the histopathological evaluation of pre and postmenopausal women using dilatation and curettage and the pipelle biopsy device. Marmara Med J. 1996;9:15–17.
MLA Aka, N. et al. “Comparison of the Histopathological Evaluation of Pre and Postmenopausal Women Using Dilatation and Curettage and the Pipelle Biopsy Device”. Marmara Medical Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, 1996, pp. 15-17.
Vancouver Aka N, Balkan E, Tuzcular Vural EZ, Kuşçu K, Peker Ö, Erkan M. Comparison of the histopathological evaluation of pre and postmenopausal women using dilatation and curettage and the pipelle biopsy device. Marmara Med J. 1996;9(1):15-7.