BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2010, Volume: 23 Issue: 2, 263 - 269, 27.04.2015

Abstract

-

References

  • 1. Nathan PA, Keniston RC, Meadows KD, et al. Predictive value of nerve conduction measurements at the carpal tunnel. Muscle Nerve 1993;16:1377–1382.
  • 2. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, et al. Diagnostic properties of nerve conduction tests in population-based carpal tunnel syndrome. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003;4:9 ( Epub 2003 May 7).
  • 3. Lew HL, Date ES, Pan SS, et al. Sensitivity, specificity, and variability of nerve conduction velocity measurements in carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86:12–16.
  • 4. Beekman R, Visser LH. Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a critical review of the literature. Muscle&Nerve 2003; 27:26–33.
  • 5. Uchiyama S, Itsubo T, Yasutomi T, et al. Quantitative MRI of the wrist and nerve conduction studies in patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76:1103–1108.
  • 6. Anonymous: Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome: summary statement. American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine , American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Muscle&Nerve 1993; 16:1390-1391.
  • 7. Kulick R.. Carpal tunnel syndrome: Orth Clin North Am 1996; 27:345-354.
  • 8. Lee D, van Holsbeeck MT, Janevski PK, et al. Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Ultrasound versus electromyography. Radiol Clin North Am 1999 ; 37:859-872.
  • 9. Zenbilci N. Elektromiyografi. Sinir Sistemi Hastalıkları. 2.Baskı. İstanbul:Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi Yayınları, 198:95-109.
  • 10. Martinoli C., Bianchi S, Gandolfo N, et al. US of nerve entrapments in osteofibrous tunnels of the lower limbs. Radiographics 2000; 20:199-217.
  • 11. Nakamichi KI, Tachibana S. Ultrasonographic measurement of median nerve cross-sectional area in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: Diagnostic accuracy. Muscle&Nerve 2002; 26:798-803.
  • 12. Wong S.M, Griffith J.F, Hui A.C.F, et al. Discriminatory sonographic criteria for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthritis & Rheumatism 2002; 46:1914-1921. 13. Wang LY, Leong CP, Huang YC, et al. Best diagnostic criterion in high-resolution ultrasonography for carpal tunnel syndrome. Chang Gung Med J 2008;31:469-476.
  • 14. Leonard L, Rangan A, Doyle G, et al. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome-is high-frequency ultrasound a useful diagnostic tool? J Hand Surg (British and European volume) 2003; 28B 1: 77-79.
  • 15. Bayrak IK, Bayrak AO, Tilki HE, et al. Ultrasonography in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Comparison with electrophysiological stage and motor unit number estimate. Muscle&Nerve 2007;35:344–348.
  • 16. Nakamichi KI, Tachibana S. Enlarged median nerve in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle&Nerve 2000 ;23:1713-1718.
  • 17. Wiesler ER, Chloros GD, Cartwright MS, et al. The use of diagnostic ultrasound in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31:726-732.

KARPAL TÜNEL SENDROMU: YÜKSEK REZOLÜSYONLU USG’NİN TANISAL DEĞERİ NEDİR?

Year 2010, Volume: 23 Issue: 2, 263 - 269, 27.04.2015

Abstract

Amaç: Karpal Tünel Sendromu (KTS), median sinir tuzağına bağlı sık görülen periferal tuzak nöropatidir.
Ultrasonografi (USG), son yıllarda karpal tünel ve median sinirin değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan ucuz ve
rahat uygulanabilen bir tekniktir.
Yöntem: KTS bulgusu, semptomları ve elektromyelografik tanısı olan 21 hastada 35 ve 20 sağlıklı olguda
40 el bileği 7.5-12 MHz prob kullanılarak USG eşliğinde değerlendirildi.
Bulgular: 21 KTS ‘li olguda 35 el bileğinin tamamı ve sağlıklı 20 sağlıklı olguda 40 el bileği doğru olarak
değerlendirildi.
Sonuç: Yüksek rezolüsyonlu USG, KTS tanısında tercih edilecek ilk basamak görüntüleme tekniği olabilir.

References

  • 1. Nathan PA, Keniston RC, Meadows KD, et al. Predictive value of nerve conduction measurements at the carpal tunnel. Muscle Nerve 1993;16:1377–1382.
  • 2. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, et al. Diagnostic properties of nerve conduction tests in population-based carpal tunnel syndrome. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003;4:9 ( Epub 2003 May 7).
  • 3. Lew HL, Date ES, Pan SS, et al. Sensitivity, specificity, and variability of nerve conduction velocity measurements in carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86:12–16.
  • 4. Beekman R, Visser LH. Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a critical review of the literature. Muscle&Nerve 2003; 27:26–33.
  • 5. Uchiyama S, Itsubo T, Yasutomi T, et al. Quantitative MRI of the wrist and nerve conduction studies in patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76:1103–1108.
  • 6. Anonymous: Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome: summary statement. American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine , American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Muscle&Nerve 1993; 16:1390-1391.
  • 7. Kulick R.. Carpal tunnel syndrome: Orth Clin North Am 1996; 27:345-354.
  • 8. Lee D, van Holsbeeck MT, Janevski PK, et al. Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Ultrasound versus electromyography. Radiol Clin North Am 1999 ; 37:859-872.
  • 9. Zenbilci N. Elektromiyografi. Sinir Sistemi Hastalıkları. 2.Baskı. İstanbul:Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi Yayınları, 198:95-109.
  • 10. Martinoli C., Bianchi S, Gandolfo N, et al. US of nerve entrapments in osteofibrous tunnels of the lower limbs. Radiographics 2000; 20:199-217.
  • 11. Nakamichi KI, Tachibana S. Ultrasonographic measurement of median nerve cross-sectional area in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: Diagnostic accuracy. Muscle&Nerve 2002; 26:798-803.
  • 12. Wong S.M, Griffith J.F, Hui A.C.F, et al. Discriminatory sonographic criteria for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthritis & Rheumatism 2002; 46:1914-1921. 13. Wang LY, Leong CP, Huang YC, et al. Best diagnostic criterion in high-resolution ultrasonography for carpal tunnel syndrome. Chang Gung Med J 2008;31:469-476.
  • 14. Leonard L, Rangan A, Doyle G, et al. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome-is high-frequency ultrasound a useful diagnostic tool? J Hand Surg (British and European volume) 2003; 28B 1: 77-79.
  • 15. Bayrak IK, Bayrak AO, Tilki HE, et al. Ultrasonography in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Comparison with electrophysiological stage and motor unit number estimate. Muscle&Nerve 2007;35:344–348.
  • 16. Nakamichi KI, Tachibana S. Enlarged median nerve in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle&Nerve 2000 ;23:1713-1718.
  • 17. Wiesler ER, Chloros GD, Cartwright MS, et al. The use of diagnostic ultrasound in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31:726-732.
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Özgür Sarıca This is me

Arda Kayhan

Enis Öztürk This is me

Sibel Bayramoğlu This is me

Nurten Turan Güner This is me

Fatma Öztora This is me

Publication Date April 27, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2010 Volume: 23 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Sarıca, Ö., Kayhan, A., Öztürk, E., Bayramoğlu, S., et al. (2015). KARPAL TÜNEL SENDROMU: YÜKSEK REZOLÜSYONLU USG’NİN TANISAL DEĞERİ NEDİR?. Marmara Medical Journal, 23(2), 263-269.
AMA Sarıca Ö, Kayhan A, Öztürk E, Bayramoğlu S, Turan Güner N, Öztora F. KARPAL TÜNEL SENDROMU: YÜKSEK REZOLÜSYONLU USG’NİN TANISAL DEĞERİ NEDİR?. Marmara Med J. August 2015;23(2):263-269.
Chicago Sarıca, Özgür, Arda Kayhan, Enis Öztürk, Sibel Bayramoğlu, Nurten Turan Güner, and Fatma Öztora. “KARPAL TÜNEL SENDROMU: YÜKSEK REZOLÜSYONLU USG’NİN TANISAL DEĞERİ NEDİR?”. Marmara Medical Journal 23, no. 2 (August 2015): 263-69.
EndNote Sarıca Ö, Kayhan A, Öztürk E, Bayramoğlu S, Turan Güner N, Öztora F (August 1, 2015) KARPAL TÜNEL SENDROMU: YÜKSEK REZOLÜSYONLU USG’NİN TANISAL DEĞERİ NEDİR?. Marmara Medical Journal 23 2 263–269.
IEEE Ö. Sarıca, A. Kayhan, E. Öztürk, S. Bayramoğlu, N. Turan Güner, and F. Öztora, “KARPAL TÜNEL SENDROMU: YÜKSEK REZOLÜSYONLU USG’NİN TANISAL DEĞERİ NEDİR?”, Marmara Med J, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 263–269, 2015.
ISNAD Sarıca, Özgür et al. “KARPAL TÜNEL SENDROMU: YÜKSEK REZOLÜSYONLU USG’NİN TANISAL DEĞERİ NEDİR?”. Marmara Medical Journal 23/2 (August 2015), 263-269.
JAMA Sarıca Ö, Kayhan A, Öztürk E, Bayramoğlu S, Turan Güner N, Öztora F. KARPAL TÜNEL SENDROMU: YÜKSEK REZOLÜSYONLU USG’NİN TANISAL DEĞERİ NEDİR?. Marmara Med J. 2015;23:263–269.
MLA Sarıca, Özgür et al. “KARPAL TÜNEL SENDROMU: YÜKSEK REZOLÜSYONLU USG’NİN TANISAL DEĞERİ NEDİR?”. Marmara Medical Journal, vol. 23, no. 2, 2015, pp. 263-9.
Vancouver Sarıca Ö, Kayhan A, Öztürk E, Bayramoğlu S, Turan Güner N, Öztora F. KARPAL TÜNEL SENDROMU: YÜKSEK REZOLÜSYONLU USG’NİN TANISAL DEĞERİ NEDİR?. Marmara Med J. 2015;23(2):263-9.